2026-10-24T16:00:16.613Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
随着爱荷华州激烈的州长竞选辩论季拉开帷幕,有一个问题似乎成为了候选人的讨论焦点,在某种程度上还让他们达成了一定共识。
“你会采取哪些直接且具体的措施来应对爱荷华州的癌症危机?”主持人向民主党人罗布·桑德和共和党人扎克·拉恩提出了这个问题,两人都表示这是他们竞选的核心议题——随后还互相指责对方做得不够。
两周后,在竞争激烈的参议院选举辩论中,爱荷华州居高不下的癌症发病率及其与农业污染的潜在关联再次被提及。
在几年前的爱荷华州,这个话题本是不可想象的——该州是美国最大的玉米和生猪生产州。
但“大型农业企业”的作用已成为政治导火索,而这场危机被描述为一场公共卫生危机。爱荷华州的癌症发病率位居全美第二,也是仅有的三个发病率呈上升趋势的州之一。
首次出现这种情况:两党都将解决癌症的环境诱因纳入了爱荷华州的竞选纲领。从州长到国会的各级共和党人和民主党人都已明确表态,承诺解决这一问题。
在州长竞选中,出身农民、得到共和党“让美国再次健康”(MAHA)阵营支持的候选人拉恩,以及温和派律师、民主党人桑德,都在竞选行程中承诺要清理水源并监管化学品。
在竞争激烈的参议院选举中,共和党国会女议员阿什莉·欣森和民主党州众议员乔什·图雷克也讨论了这个问题,两人本月都呼吁增加资金投入以确保饮用水安全。
根据AdImpact的数据,今年,爱荷华州已播出了100多条提及癌症的竞选广告,总投入近3000万美元。而在2022年的上一次中期选举中,仅有1条相关广告,资金投入不到20万美元。
“九个月前,除了我之外,没有任何候选人谈论这个问题,而现在几乎每个候选人都把它作为竞选的重点,”长期关注水质问题的倡导者、现任民主党州农业秘书候选人克里斯·琼斯说道。
然而两党都面临着一个棘手的挑战:在批评“大型农业企业”做法的同时,还要兼顾爱荷华州对该行业的经济依赖。在左翼,琼斯认为民主党在挑战大型农业企业方面不够大胆,已将阵地让给了被MAHA运动激发的共和党人。他比其他所有候选人都更进一步,呼吁加强监管并减少对玉米和大豆生产的依赖。
“你这里有一个本应是民主党天然关注的问题:清洁环境,”他告诉CNN。但该党“却过于胆怯,不敢推进这个问题。”
但环保选民联盟的萨拉·施赖伯认为,共和党的内部分歧削弱了其公信力,一些MAHA选民对特朗普未兑现的承诺感到失望。
“他们希望民选官员能够回应”他们的诉求——尤其是健康和环境方面——“而他们不只是会选边站,”她说道。
爱荷华州卫生部将癌症发病率飙升归因于多种生活方式因素:肥胖、酗酒和吸烟是主要原因。但该部门也承认,环境暴露可能起到了作用,这让看到社区里出现癌症的爱荷华州民众感到不安。
环保倡导者和一些农民指出,从数千吨牲畜粪便中渗漏到该州水域的硝酸盐浓缩是一个关键诱因。
“这份报告确实改变了普通爱荷华州民众的看法,”农民、倡导加强政府环境毒素管控的组织“ lobe游骑兵 ”创始成员扎克·史密斯说,一份显示爱荷华州癌症发病率令人担忧的报告——该国上升最快的地区。
“这股势头和能量已经到来。但我们需要将其转化为有实际立法支持的有意义行动,”独立选民史密斯说道,“这才是我们感兴趣的——激发公众足够的热情,让他们愿意去投票。”
该州共和党在本次选举中强调环境问题,既体现了问题的严重程度,也反映了政治联盟的转变。
“过去这是自由派‘热爱自然’群体的事,” 另一位Lobe游骑兵创始人、共和党人詹姆斯·赫普说道,“过去有一种偏见,如果你谈论任何环境问题,你就会被视为‘热爱自然的人’,但现在我认为你只是一个试图做正确事情的知情公民。”
许多接受CNN采访的爱荷华州民众将这种势头归功于MAHA运动,该运动全力支持拉恩,助其意外赢得党内初选,击败了得到特朗普背书的共和党众议员兰迪·费恩斯特拉。
MAHA行动是由长期支持罗伯特·F·肯尼迪 Jr.的盟友、出版人托尼·莱昂斯运营的政治倡导组织,该组织向拉恩的竞选投入了150万美元,并夸口称拉恩是该政治行动委员会2026年的首位提名人。
“MAHA是第一个相信扎克·拉恩的,爱荷华州共和党证明了我们是对的,”莱昂斯在一份声明中说道,“我们将在11月证明我们能够获胜。”
但外界对该党的承诺仍持怀疑态度。拉恩必须应对华盛顿共和党人的行动,特朗普政府曾下令增加国内农药生产,并废除了一系列环境法规。
“我是最早站出来说签署扩大美国农药生产的行政命令是错误举措的人之一,”拉恩本月在 CBS《面对国家》节目中表示,“我认为如果我们能就此事向总统提供建议,他会更好地理解这一点。”
但大卫·墨菲是一位支持罗伯特·F·肯尼迪 Jr.总统竞选的MAHA阵营民主党人,他对拉恩持怀疑态度,因为特朗普领导下的共和党在MAHA问题上的表现令人失望。
“我从根本上认为,特朗普政府和共和党浪费了肯尼迪背书的重大机遇,”墨菲说,他是第五代爱荷华州人,目前在琼斯的农业秘书竞选团队工作。
在全国竞争最激烈的参议院选举之一中,图雷克的盟友——他天生患有脊柱裂,病因与他父亲在越南接触橙剂有关——已将这个问题作为攻击共和党对手的手段。
“全美癌症发病率正在下降,但爱荷华州却在上升。作为一名医生,我无法忽视正在发生的事情,”来自爱荷华州赫胥黎的塞尔登·斯宾塞医生在民主党超级政治行动委员会的一则广告中说道,该广告自9月以来已投入近300万美元用于播放时段。
广告还批评欣森接受被指控污染者的竞选捐款。
当被问及此事时,欣森的竞选团队并未回应广告中的指控。但本周,她与密歇根州民主党众议员希拉里·朔尔滕联合提出了旨在改善癌症早诊筛查可及性的立法。
“太多爱荷华州家庭受到了癌症的影响,包括我的家庭。爱荷华州不断上升的癌症发病率是不可接受的,我们必须尽一切努力扭转这一趋势,”欣森在社交媒体上写道。
共和党人也因MAHA运动引发的内部分歧而感到困扰,尤其是在商业利益和公共卫生利益发生冲突的时候。
一个核心争议点是草甘膦——一种通常被称为农达的除草剂。虽然许多爱荷华州民众认为粪便中的硝酸盐水平导致了健康问题,但农民和MAHA活动人士之间在除草剂问题上存在重大分歧,后者称其也是导致全国癌症发病率上升的原因。
“现实情况是,我们所有人都大量接触过草甘膦,”史密斯说,“就像很多农民一样。”他表示,对这种化学品的分歧制造了一条分界线,疏远了农民——他们中的许多人表示,这对保障每年数百万作物的安全是必要的——和更广泛的MAHA诉求。
关于草甘膦与健康风险的科学结论远未明确。美国环境保护署今年正在对其安全性进行常规审查,但肯尼迪的介入放大了这个问题,他长期以来一直反对广泛使用这种农药。
反映出内部分歧,爱荷华州农业秘书的共和党候选人迈克·奈格在这个问题上批评了本党的州长候选人拉恩。
“这比一些人想让我们看到的要复杂得多,我认为有些人已经把这当成了政治问题。我觉得这可能非常危险,”他在8月说道。
在右翼的裂痕中,民主党人正大力推进这一问题。“考虑到爱荷华州的癌症发病率,出现一个更强大的MAHA运动是不足为奇的,”参议院多数党政治行动委员会的劳伦·弗伦奇表示,该委员会是支持图雷克-欣森选举广告的民主党超级政治行动委员会。
不过,虽然这个新兴运动“目前更倾向于共和党”,但她看到了机会。对民主党人来说,谈论大型农业企业的化学品“契合腐败这个更大的议题,”她说道,并提到了本届选举周期中选民关注的另一个核心问题。
“爱荷华州共和党面临的问题是,他们长期以来一直站在错误的一边。他们选择与那些污染水源的公司为伍,”她说道。
不过,一些民主党人也面临着质疑。拉恩指责桑德受制于农业利益,并指控他接受了一名“污染你们饮用水”的捐赠者的资金——桑德的竞选团队对此予以坚决否认。
在竞选的最后几周,桑德在西得梅因与癌症幸存者举行了圆桌会议,讨论他解决这一问题的计划,并承诺“成立癌症特别工作组”。
“罗布·桑德是竞选中唯一有计划解决这些问题的候选人,”副竞选经理艾玛·奥布赖恩说,“与此同时,扎克·拉恩支持《一个伟大而美好法案》,该法案削减了癌症研究的资金,还希望禁止mRNA疫苗,而这些疫苗已被发现是治疗癌症的有前景的方法。”
拉恩的竞选团队未回应CNN的置评请求。
本周,库克政治报告联合New River Strategies和GS Strategy Group发布的民调显示,在州长竞选中,桑德明显领先于拉恩。
本周CNN对爱荷华州民调的汇总显示,参议院选举竞争胶着。
_CNN的娜迪亚·库南和阿里尔·爱德华兹-利维为本报道做出了贡献。
Iowa’s cancer problem is scrambling the midterms
2026-10-24T16:00:16.613Z / CNN
As the debate season kicked off in Iowa’s heated gubernatorial race, one question seemed to animate and, in some ways, unify the candidates.
“What are the immediate and specific steps that you would take to combat Iowa’s cancer crisis?” the moderator asked the Democrat Rob Sand and Republican Zach Lahn, who both said it was a foundational issue for their campaigns — before each accusing the other of not doing enough.
Two weeks later, Iowa’s elevated cancer rates and their potential links to farm pollution came up again, at a debate in the competitive race for Senate.
The subject would have been unimaginable just a few years ago in Iowa, the country’s biggest corn and hog-producing state.
But the role of “Big Ag” has become a political lightning rod amid what is being described as a public health crisis. Iowa suffers from the second-highest cancer rate in the US and is one of only three states where the rate is rising.
For the first time, tackling the environmental causes of cancer has been included in Iowa campaign platforms for both parties. Republicans and Democrats up and down the ticket have staked out positions vowing to take on the issue.
In the governor’s race,Lahn, a farmer-turned-candidate backed by the “Make America Healthy Again” wing of the GOP, and Democrat Sand, a moderate lawyer, have made campaign trail promises to clean up water and regulate chemicals.
In the tight Senate race, Republican Congresswoman Ashley Hinson and Democratic State Representative Josh Turek have wrestled with the question too, both calling this month for more funding to ensure safe drinking water.
This year, nearly $30 million has been spent airing more than 100 campaign ads in Iowa that mention cancer, according to AdImpact data. In the last midterms in 2022, there was just one, backed by a little under $200,000.
“Nine months ago, there was no candidate talking about this except me, and now literally every candidate is featuring it in their campaign,” said Chris Jones, a long-time water quality advocate and now Democratic candidate for state agriculture secretary.
Yet both parties face the awkward challenge of balancing criticism of “Big Ag” practices with Iowa’s economic reliance on the sector. On the left, Jones argues Democrats have not been bold enough to take on Big Ag, ceding ground to Republicans energized by MAHA. He has gone further than any of the other candidates on the ballot in calling for more regulation and a move away from dependence on corn and soybean production.
“You’ve got an issue here that should be a natural issue for Democrats: Clean environment,” he told CNN. But the party was “too chicken to take this issue up,” he said.
But divisions within the Republican Party dent its credibility, argues Sara Schreiber of the League of Conservation Voters, with some MAHA voters disillusioned by Trump’s unkept promises for their movement.
“They want elected officials to be responsive” to their cause – health and the environment chief among them – “and they’re not just going to be partisan,” she said.
Iowa’s Health Department attributes much of its soaring cancer rates to several lifestyle factors: Obesity, alcohol and smoking chief among them. But it acknowledged that environmental exposures could play a role, inflaming Iowans who see cancer in their community.
Environmental advocates and some farmers highlight the concentration of nitrate from thousands of tons of livestock manure that leaks into the state’s waters as a key culprit.
A state cancer report showing Iowa’s sobering rates –– the fastest-rising in the country — “was really the game changer,” for average Iowans, said Zach Smith, a farmer and founding member of the Lobe Rangers, an advocacy group that campaigns for stronger government action on environmental toxins.
“This wave of momentum and energy came in. But we need to actually turn it into something meaningful with real legislation,” said Smith, an independent voter.“That’s what we’re interested in — getting the public wound up enough where they’re willing to vote.”
That the state’s Republican Party has emphasized environmental issues this election speaks both to the perceived scale of the problem and the shifting political coalitions.
“It used to be a kind of liberal, tree-hugger type thing,” said James Hepp, another Lobe Rangers founder and a Republican. “It had that stigma where if you talked to any environment, you were a tree hugger, but now I think you’re just an informed citizen trying to do what’s best.”
Many Iowans who spoke to CNN credited the momentum to the MAHA movement, which threw its support behind Lahn, powering his surprise primary victory over the Trump-endorsed GOP Rep. Randy Feenstra.
MAHA Action, a political advocacy group run by longtime Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ally and book publisher Tony Lyons, put $1.5 million towards Lahn’s campaign, and boasts that he was the PAC’s first 2026 endorsement.
“MAHA was the first to believe in Zach Lahn, and the Iowa Republicans proved us right,” Lyons said in a statement. “November is where we prove we can win.”
Yet there is distrust over the party’s commitment. Lahn has had to wrestle with GOP action in Washington, where the Trump administration ordered more domestic production of pesticides and rolled back a host of environmental regulations.
“I was one of the first people to come out and say that this was the wrong move to sign that executive order,” on more US pesticide production, Lahn told CBS’ “Face the Nation” this month. “I think that if we could give the president the advice on that, that he would understand that better.”
But David Murphy, a MAHA-aligned Democrat who supported RFK Jr.’s presidential run, says he’s skeptical of Lahn because of the disappointing Republican record on MAHA under Trump.
“I fundamentally think that the Trump administration and Republicans have screwed up a major opportunity that RFK Jr. endorsed,” said Murphy, a fifth-generation Iowan who now works on Jones’ agriculture secretary campaign.
In one of the most competitive Senate races in the country, allies of Turek —who was born with Spina Bifida linked to his father’s exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam — have raised the subject to attack his Republican opponent.
“Across America, cancer rates are going down, but in Iowa they’re going up. As a doctor, I cannot ignore what is happening,” says Dr. Selden Spencer of Huxley, Iowa, in an ad from a Democratic super PAC with nearly $3 million spent in airtime since September.
It goes on to criticize Hinson for accepting campaign contributions from accused polluters.
Hinson’s campaign did not address the claims in the ad when asked. But this week, she joined with Democratic Rep. Hillary Scholten of Michigan to introduce legislation aimed at improving access to early detection cancer screenings.
“So many Iowa families have been touched by cancer, including mine. Iowa’s rising cancer rates are unacceptable, and we have to do everything we can to reverse this trend,” Hinson wrote on social media.
Republicans are also grappling with internal fractures driven by the MAHA movement, when pro-business and public health interests collide.
One key point of contention is glyphosate — an herbicide commonly known as RoundUp. While many Iowans believe nitrate levels from manure are causing health problems, there are significant divides over the herbicide between farmers and MAHA activists, who say it is also driving cancer rates across the country.
“The reality is that we have all had a lot of exposure to glyphosate,” said Smith, “as a lot of farmers have.” Disagreement over the chemical has created a dividing line that has alienated farmers — many of whom say it is necessary to keep millions of crops safe through each farming season — from the broader MAHA message, he said.
The science on glyphosate and health risks is far from definitive. The Environmental Protection Agency is undergoing a routine review of its safety this year, but the issue has been supercharged by Kennedy, who has a history fighting broad use of the pesticide.
Reflecting the internal divisions, the Republican candidate for Iowa agriculture secretary, Mike Naig, has criticized Lahn, his party’s gubernatorial candidate, on the subject.
“This is more complex than what some want to make it, and I think you’ve got some who have decided it’s a political issue. And I think that can be very dangerous,” he said in August.
Amid fissures on the right, Democrats are leaning into the issue. It’s“**unsurprising that one of the stronger MAHA movements” emerged in Iowa given the incidence of cancer there, said Lauren French of Senate Majority PAC, the Democratic super PAC behind the ads in the Turek-Hinson race.
But while the burgeoning movement is “leaning more Republican at the moment,” she sees an opening. For Democrats, talking about Big Ag chemicals“fits into the larger issue of corruption,” she said, nodding to another major voter concern this cycle.
“The problem for Republicans in Iowa, is that they have a long history of being on the wrong side of this. They chose to align themselves with the companies that are doing the poisoning of the water,” she said.
Some Democrats, however, also face scrutiny. Lahn has accused Sand of being beholden to agricultural interests and accused him of taking money from a donor “caught polluting your drinking water” — claims vigorously contested by Sand’s campaign.
In the closing weeks of the race, Sand has held a roundtable with cancer survivors in West Des Moines, discussing his plans to tackle the problem and pledging to “appoint a Cancer Task Force.”
“Rob Sand is the only candidate in the race with a plan to address those concerns,” said Emma O’Brien, the deputy campaign manager. “Meanwhile, Zach Lahn supports the One Big Beautiful Bill, which cuts funding for cancer research, and wants to ban mRNA vaccines, which have been found to be a promising treatment for cancer.”
Lahn’s campaign did not reply to CNN’s requests for comment.
A poll released this week from the Cook Political Report, in partnership with New River Strategies and GS Strategy Group, has Sand with a clear lead over Lahn in the contest for governor.
A CNN poll of polls in Iowa this week shows the Senate race in a dead heat.
CNN’s Nadia Kounang and Ariel Edwards-Levy contributed to this report.
发表回复