伊丽莎白·沃伦警告:食品券削减与高物价正引发“粮食不安全危机”


2026年10月22日 / 美国东部时间上午9:48 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

据参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦称,在因通胀上涨额外承担220亿美元食品开支,叠加数十亿美元食品券削减后,美国民众正面临一场“粮食不安全危机”。

在10月21日致美国农业部部长布鲁克·罗林斯的信中,这位马萨诸塞州民主党议员表示,食品价格上涨与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)削减的双重打击,正对数百万家庭造成影响。

沃伦同时要求美国农业部与议员们合作,撤销那些自2025年7月以来已导致520万人失去SNAP福利的食品券政策。

反饥饿专家表示,SNAP的 enrollment 目前已降至2019年以来的最低水平,随着该计划的额外调整生效,未来几个月参与人数可能进一步缩减。2025年特朗普总统签署生效的《一项宏大美好法案》(OBBBA)作为一项税收与开支法案,扩大了SNAP的工作要求,并将更多项目成本转移给各州。专家称,这些调整为参保设置了新障碍。

美国农业部于2025年暂停了其年度粮食不安全研究,当时称该报告“冗余、成本高昂且被政治化”。但纽约联邦储备银行5月的一份分析发现,“粮食不安全情况显著上升,尤其是在低学历、低收入家庭和有年幼子女的家庭中”。

纽约联储今年早些时候的调查显示,10%的美国家庭表示食物不足,他们的孩子有时会吃不上饭,这一比例是2020年4%的两倍多。在年收入低于5万美元的家庭中,近20%表示食物不足,而六年前这一比例约为7%。

“我的办公室制定了一项‘食品痛苦指数’,用以衡量食品价格上涨与SNAP参与率下降给美国家庭带来的总成本,”沃伦在给农业部的信中说道,“该指数结合了经通胀调整后的消费者支出计算出的172亿美元以上食品杂货价格上涨,以及超过51亿美元的家庭SNAP福利损失。”

blob:https://www.cbsnews.com/0b3444ea-fe0a-4a1f-bb2b-922d601103b3

美国农业部和白宫未回复置评请求。

修改SNAP政策需要议员们为食品券项目通过新规则。一些反饥饿倡导者和州级组织目前正在游说国会推迟《一项宏大美好法案》中针对SNAP的部分调整,其中包括一项将于2027年10月起生效的规定,该规定要求支付错误率较高的州承担数十亿美元额外成本。

美国农业部是SNAP的主要联邦监管机构和规则制定方,在项目管理上拥有一定自主权。例如,该机构曾允许部分州禁止参保者使用食品券购买苏打水和糖果,尽管今年早些时候一名联邦法官裁定农业部在实施这些规则时超出了其权限范围。

沃伦还指出,特朗普总统的关税政策也是推高食品价格的因素之一。纽约联储近期的研究显示,去年的进口关税到今年2月为止推高了约2.9个百分点的美国通胀。研究人员称,如果没有这些关税,商品价格本应出现下降。

Elizabeth Warren warns of “food insecurity crisis” from SNAP cuts and higher prices

October 22, 2026 / 9:48 AM EDT / CBS News

Americans are facing a “food insecurity crisis” after shouldering an additional $22 billion in food costs due to rising inflation and billions of dollars in food-stamp cuts, according to Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

In an Oct. 21 letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, the Massachusetts Democrat said that the combination of rising food prices and cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program has created a “one-two punch” for millions of households.

Warren also asked the USDA to work with lawmakers to reverse food-stamp policies that have resulted in 5.2 million people losing SNAP benefits since July 2025.

SNAP enrollment, now at its lowest level since 2019, could shrink in the coming months as additional changes to the program take effect, according to anti-hunger experts. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a tax and spending law signed into law by President Trump in 2025, expanded SNAP’s work requirements and shifted more of the program’s costs onto states. Those changes have created new hurdles for enrollment, according to experts.

The USDA halted its annual study on food insecurity in 2025, saying at the time that the report was “redundant, costly [and] politicized.” But a May analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found “a remarkable increase in food insecurity, particularly among lower-educated and lower-income households and households with young children.”

The New York Fed found earlier this year that 10% of U.S. families reported they didn’t have enough food and that their children sometimes missed meals, more than double the 4% share in 2020. Almost 20% of families with annual income of less than $50,000 reported not having enough food, up from about 7% six years ago.

“My office developed a ‘food misery index’ to measure how much the combination of rising food prices and declining SNAP participation is costing American households,” Warren said in her letter to the USDA. “The index combines the more than $17.2 billion in rising grocery prices — calculated by inflation-adjusting consumer expenditures — with the more than $5.1 billion in lost household SNAP benefits.”

blob:https://www.cbsnews.com/0b3444ea-fe0a-4a1f-bb2b-922d601103b3

The USDA and White House didn’t return a request for comment.

Changing SNAP policies would require lawmakers to pass new rules for the food-stamp program. Some anti-hunger advocates and state organizations are now lobbying Congress to delay some of the OBBBA’s changes to SNAP, including a rule that would require states with high payment error rates to absorb billions in additional costs starting in October 2027.

The USDA serves as the primary federal regulator and rule-maker for SNAP, giving it some leeway in administering the program. For instance, the agency allowed some states to ban enrollees from using food stamps to buy soda and candy, although a federal judge earlier this year ruled that the Agriculture Department exceeded its authority in implementing the rules.

Warren also pointed to President Trump’s tariffs as contributing to higher food prices. Higher import duties last year boosted U.S. inflation by about 2.9 percentage points through February, according to recent research from the New York Fed. Without those tariffs, the price of goods would have declined, the researchers said.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2