2026-10-17T10:30:45.613Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/17/politics/katie-zacharia-trump-midterms
周五,凯蒂·扎卡里亚正为保住白宫新闻秘书职位进行媒体巡回宣传时,福克斯新闻《福克斯和朋友们》主持人劳伦斯·琼斯提问她是否后悔未披露自己从未通过律师资格考试,尽管她此前多次自称是律师。
扎卡里亚的回应是:“那些问题没被问到。”
问题的关键就在这里:这并非资质问题——而是涉及她背景的一个基本问题,而唐纳德·特朗普总统及其白宫未能对其进行背景调查。
扎卡里亚担任新闻秘书的任期短得惊人且动荡不安,这远非特朗普第二任期内最严重或最重大的失误,但在令人尴尬程度上却名列前茅。
短短一周时间里,白宫就暴露了其整个团队是多么缺乏方向、冲动自大——而距离选民在2026年中期选举中对其作出评判仅剩下几周时间。
多名顾问告诉CNN,特朗普周五解雇了扎卡里亚,此时距她上任仅五天。她的任期创下了特朗普白宫高级助手任职时长的新纪录,将前特朗普政府第一任期通讯主任安东尼·斯卡拉穆奇创下的纪录缩短了一半。(“一个斯卡拉穆奇”此后已成为非正式时长单位,指代11天。)
考虑到扎卡里亚是特朗普亲自挑选的,且他通常不愿承认自己犯错,此次事件显然闹得足够严重才导致她被解雇。
在周二的首次新闻发布会上,扎卡里亚在14分钟的亮相中大部分时间都紧张地照着稿子念,多次磕磕绊绊,之后仅点名了三家亲保守派媒体的记者提问。
随后她接连参加多场媒体访谈,这进一步印证了她很可能会成为白宫讲台上的累赘。特朗普随后直接终止了她的职务,甚至没让她进行第二次新闻发布会。
这件事令人尴尬有多方面原因。
扎卡里亚并非仓促选拔的产物:前白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·利夫特早在两个多月前的8月12日就宣布离职,这有充足时间挑选合适的人选。
据CNN报道,白宫确实有一系列候选人,但其中一些人存在不可饶恕的缺陷——偶尔会发表批评特朗普的言论。扎卡里亚的名字在选拔后期才突然出现,此前并未被纳入考虑范围。和诸多事情一样,特朗普身边的人似乎很快就将他的一时兴起变成了现实。
当然,特朗普认为她能胜任这份工作是有合理原因的。他无疑多次在有线电视新闻上看到她为自己辩护,这是他筛选求职者的首选方式。但担任新闻秘书与在电视上接受通常友好的主持人采访并非一回事。而且客观来看,她的新闻发布会表现糟糕透顶。
随后白宫进一步加剧了混乱。
白宫安排扎卡里亚前往友好媒体机构进行巡回宣传,显然是希望借此争取支持,证明她能够胜任这项工作。但结果适得其反。
她遭到了保守派特朗普盟友的尖锐质问,这些人表面上担心她能否胜任白宫发言人的角色。而这些访谈——比那场新闻发布会更甚——让特朗普得出结论,她“还没准备好登上黄金时段舞台”,一名直接了解特朗普此番言论的人士告诉CNN。
这些持怀疑态度的保守派特朗普盟友之一就是福克斯新闻的肖恩·汉尼提。周二晚,他按照一贯套路行事:抨击“带有偏见且腐败不堪的恶毒媒体”对扎卡里亚过于苛刻。但在周四晚对她的采访中,他却提出了一系列严肃且尖锐的问题。
特朗普周五抱怨称,扎卡里亚“像在媒体的迫害下受尽了折磨”。但当你自己的媒体盟友都在进行审查时,这种说辞就站不住脚了。(一些盟友还指责扎卡里亚夸大了简历。)
和汉尼提一样,白宫最初为扎卡里亚背书,如今也颜面扫地。
白宫通讯主任史蒂文·张在周二上午一条情绪激动的社交媒体帖子中保证,扎卡里亚的开局“非常出色”,她“掌控了全场”。白宫新闻稿称赞她的表现“令人信服”,并剪辑了她所谓的高光时刻。本周晚些时候,史蒂文·张还坚称,到特朗普第二任期结束时,扎卡里亚将被铭记为“史上最优秀的新闻秘书之一”。
打脸了。
但对白宫而言,整个事件最糟糕的部分或许在于,它进一步强化了外界早已存在的一种说法:特朗普的领导风格混乱不堪,无法有效管理联邦政府。
这种说法早有诸多依据,包括特朗普最近取消的两项计划:用纳税人的钱投放政治广告和直播处决——两项都遭到了80%以上美国人的反对。
在总统任期早期,特朗普就让埃隆·马斯克拥有近乎全权,似乎可以为所欲为。后来许多被解雇的官员不得不复职,因为人们发现他们确实承担着至关重要的工作——或者说他们根本无法被合法解雇。
此前还发生过“信号门”事件,特朗普的关税政策反复无常,政府在伊朗战争问题上无法统一口径。
和扎卡里亚的情况类似,特朗普也曾在参议院确认任命后不久就解雇官员,包括美国疾病控制与预防中心主任和美国国税局局长。(在后一例中,他在不到一周的时间内就解雇了代理接任者。)他的第一任国家安全顾问在任不到三个月就被调任其他职位,原因就是“信号门”事件。
美国民众似乎已经注意到了这一点。CNN7月的一项民调显示,65%的受访者不认可特朗普对联邦政府的管理,仅35%的人认可。
其中74%的独立选民,甚至28%的共和党人和倾向共和党的独立选民都不认可他的管理。
“一个扎卡里亚”虽然没有“一个斯卡拉穆奇”那么朗朗上口,但她短暂的任期是一个无心之失,为选民提供了一个类似的简易指代,而此时对特朗普来说正是极其不利的时刻。
Why the Katie Zacharia debacle is a huge embarrassment for Trump and his White House
2026-10-17T10:30:45.613Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/17/politics/katie-zacharia-trump-midterms
Katie Zacharia was on a media tour to save her job as White House press secretary on Friday when “Fox and Friends” host Lawrence Jones asked whether she wished she had disclosed never passing the bar exam, despite repeatedly claiming to be a lawyer.
Zacharia’s response: “Those questions weren’t asked.”
And therein lies the problem: It’s not a matter of qualifications — it’s a basic question about her background that President Donald Trump and his White House failed to vet.
Zacharia’s stunningly short and turbulent tenure as press secretary is far from the biggest or most substantial foul-up of Trump’s second term. But it does rank remarkably high on the embarrassment quotient.
In one fell swoop over the course of a week, the White House confirmed how rudderless, impulsive and hubristic its entire operation is — and with just a few weeks to go before voters render their judgment on it in the 2026 midterm elections.
Trump fired Zacharia as press secretary on Friday, advisers told CNN, just five days after she started the job. Her tenure has set the new benchmark for brevity as a top Trump White House aide, halving the record set by first-term Trump communications director Anthony Scaramucci. (“A Scaramucci” has since become an informal unit measuring 11 days.)
Given that Trump personally selected Zacharia and he is generally loath to admit he’s made a mistake, it took a pretty rough week to prompt her ouster.
In her inaugural briefing on Tuesday, Zacharia spent most of a 14-minute appearance nervously reading from a script that she repeatedly stumbled over before calling on just three reporters from conservative-friendly outlets.
Then she went on a stream of media appearances that only reinforced she would likely be a liability at the White House lectern. Trump subsequently pulled the plug without even giving her a second briefing.
It’s embarrassing for a number of reasons.
It’s not as if Zacharia was the product of a process that needed to be rushed; former White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced her departure more than two months ago, on August 12. That’s plenty of time to make sure you have the right person.
The White House did have a series of candidates, CNN has reported, but some of them suffered from the unforgivable deficit of having occasionally said negative things about Trump. Zacharia’s name emerged suddenly late in the process, after not being previously considered. And as with so many things, it appears those around Trump quickly turned his whim into reality.
There are understandable reasons for why Trump might have thought she could do the job, of course. He had undoubtedly seen her defending him on cable news plenty of times, his preferred method for screening job candidates. But serving as press secretary isn’t the same as doing TV hits with often-friendly hosts. And her briefing performance was objectively brutal.
Then the White House compounded its mess.
It dispatched Zacharia on a media tour of friendly outlets, apparently in hopes of rallying support and showing she was up to the task. But it proved the opposite.
She was peppered with tough questions from conservative Trump allies who were ostensibly worried about her ability to handle being the face of the White House’s messaging. And those appearances — more than the briefing — made Trump conclude that she “wasn’t ready for prime time,” a person with direct knowledge of his comments told CNN.
One of those skeptical conservative Trump allies was Fox News’ Sean Hannity. On Tuesday night, he was reading from the typical playbook: bashing the “abusively biased, corrupt news media” for being mean to Zacharia. But during his interview with her Thursday night, he asked her a series of sober and probing questions.
Trump on Friday bemoaned how Zacharia was “made to suffer like she’s suffered at the hands of the press.” But it’s a lot harder to make that argument when your own media allies have done the scrutinizing. (Some of them also dinged Zacharia for her resume inflation.)
And similar to Hannity, the White House now has egg on its face after initially vouching for Zacharia.
White House communications director Steven Cheung assured in an excitable social media post Tuesday morning that Zacharia had a “tremendous start” in which she “commanded the room.” A White House press release hailed her “commanding” performance and clipped what it cast as her highlights. Later in the week, Cheung insisted she would be remembered as “one of the all-time greats” by the end of Trump’s second term.
Oops.
But perhaps the worst part of this whole episode for the White House is that it further solidifies a pre-existing narrative of Trump’s chaotic leadership style and inability to effectively manage the federal government.
There’s been plenty of grist for that mill, including Trump’s recently aborted decisions to run taxpayer-funded political ads and to live stream an execution — both of which 80%-plus Americans opposed.
Earlier in his presidency, Trump rained chaos on the government by giving Elon Musk apparent carte blanche to do, seemingly, more or less whatever he wanted. Many people who were fired later had to be reinstated when it was discovered that, actually, they did really important jobs — or couldn’t legally be fired.
There was Signalgate and the whiplash over Trump’s tariffs and the administration’s inability to get its story straight on the Iran war.
Similar to Zacharia, Trump also removed officials shortly after the Senate confirmed them, including the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and his IRS commissioner. (In the latter case, he also removed the acting replacement after less than a week.) His first national security adviser was moved to another job after less than three months, thanks to Signalgate.
And the American people appear to have noticed. A CNN poll in July showed they disapproved of Trump’s management of the federal government, 65%-35%.
Fully 74% of independents and even 28% of Republicans and GOP-leaning independents disapproved.
“A Zacharia” doesn’t have the same ring to it as “a Scaramucci” does. But her tenure is an unforced error that gives voters a similar shorthand at a remarkably inopportune time for Trump.
发表回复