2026年10月15日 / 美国东部时间上午11:54 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿讯 —— 总统特朗普已正式援引行政特权,以阻止俄亥俄州民主党众议员乔伊斯·比蒂获取某些记录,这是比蒂针对特朗普临时关闭肯尼迪中心进行翻新的举措发起的法律诉讼的一部分。
白宫副法律顾问约书亚·霍伊特周三向联邦法官通报了特朗普对总统通信特权的正式援引,这是行政特权的一种形式。霍伊特表示,该特权涵盖特朗普、其顾问与肯尼迪中心员工之间关于总统职责以及该表演艺术机构“有效运转”的信息、文件或通信内容。
霍伊特辩称,由于总统有权任命肯尼迪中心董事会及相关艺术咨询委员会成员,他必须“熟悉”该机构的管理、运营、筹款工作及计划活动。
“我认为,如果没有上述通信所享有的总统通信特权保护,总统顾问及其工作人员在收集相关信息、探索替代方案以及就履行总统职责提供充分知情的建议时,将会受到抑制,”这位白宫律师在一份声明中写道。
在另一份提交的文件中,司法部律师指责比蒂正在进行“钓鱼式调查”,这引发了权力分立方面的担忧。
“尽管总统的法定职责与董事长的信托职责存在重叠,但就行政特权而言,关键在于原告寻求的是与总统以官方身份采取的行动相关的信息、文件和通信,”他们辩称。
行政特权并非绝对,若能充分证明对相关信息有需求,即可推翻该特权。
由特朗普政府官员和总统盟友组成的肯尼迪中心董事会去年选举特朗普担任董事会主席,使其成为首位担任该职务的在任总统。特朗普援引行政特权以保护与肯尼迪中心相关的记录,这引发了新的、未经检验的问题:该保护范围是否延伸至总统作为该表演艺术机构董事长的行为。肯尼迪中心由国会于1958年创立,资金来自联邦拨款、门票收入和私人捐赠的混合来源。
特朗普对与他试图关闭肯尼迪中心两年以进行翻新、该中心的财务状况、将特朗普姓名添加到建筑外立面的努力以及肯尼迪中心可能被拆除的可能性相关的多项记录援引了行政特权。
特朗普上月表示,如果他和他的政府没有因筹款和牵头推动该机构维修工作而获得认可,肯尼迪中心将关闭并“最终被拆除”,此后有关该建筑可能被拆除的担忧开始浮现。
特朗普还被拍到在空军一号上查看一块看起来写着“肯尼迪中心已拆除”的标牌。
这场愈演愈烈的行政特权争端是比蒂去年12月提起的诉讼的一部分,该诉讼挑战董事会将该中心更名为“唐纳德·J·特朗普与约翰·F·肯尼迪表演艺术纪念中心”以及关闭该机构两年进行翻新的举措。比蒂是肯尼迪中心董事会的当然成员。
今年5月,美国地区法官克里斯托弗·库珀叫停了该中心的关闭计划,并下令移除建筑外立面上的特朗普姓名。施工人员于6月将总统姓名从建筑外部剥离,但建筑的前门廊此后一直被防水布覆盖,遮盖了大部分名称。
库珀还允许比蒂从肯尼迪中心收集有关关闭主建筑和任何潜在拆除决定的信息,并进行证词采集,这一过程被称为证据开示。
但比蒂的律师表示,司法部试图阻止她调查肯尼迪中心工作人员作为董事会主席从特朗普处收到的任何指示和意见,并拒绝移交与这些通信相关的任何文件。
他们指责司法部“以史无前例的方式不当主张全面特权”,并要求库珀命令肯尼迪中心移交比蒂寻求的材料。
针对比蒂的调查请求,司法部律师上月末表示,“就证据开示请求寻求涉及总统或白宫工作人员的通信而言,这些请求是不当的,因为它们可能会寻求受总统通信特权保护的信息。”
在上周对肯尼迪中心执行董事兼首席运营官马修·弗洛卡的证词采集过程中,一名司法部律师基于行政特权的保护性主张,多次指示弗洛卡拒绝回答比蒂的一名律师提出的某些问题。
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/protesters-kennedy-center-trump-threatens-demolition/
特朗普威胁拆除肯尼迪中心后,抗议者聚集在中心外
(时长04:17)
Trump formally asserts executive privilege in legal fight over Kennedy Center’s closure
October 15, 2026 / 11:54 AM EDT / CBS News
Washington — President Trump has formally invoked executive privilege to shield certain records from Democratic Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio as part of her ongoing legal challenge to the president’s effort to temporarily shutter the Kennedy Center for renovations.
White House deputy counsel Joshua Hoyt informed a federal judge on Wednesday of Mr. Trump’s formal assertion of the presidential communications privilege, a form of executive privilege. Hoyt said it covers information, documents or communications between Mr. Trump, his advisers and Kennedy Center employees about the president’s duties and “the effective functioning” of the performing arts institution.
Hoyt argued that because the president appoints members of the Kennedy Center’s board and a related Advisory Committee on the Arts, he must “familiarize himself” with the institution’s management, operations, fundraising efforts and planned activities.
“I believe that, without the protection of the presidential communications privilege over the communications described above, presidential advisors and their staff members would be chilled from gathering relevant information, exploring alternatives, and providing fully informed recommendations regarding the performance of the President’s duties,” the White House lawyer wrote in a declaration.
In a separate filing, Justice Department lawyers accused Beatty of conducting a “fishing expedition” that raises separation-of-powers concerns.
“Even though the President’s statutory duties and the Chairman’s trust duties overlap, what matters for the purpose of executive privilege is that Plaintiff seeks information, documents, and communications concerning the President’s actions in his official capacity,” they argued.
Executive privilege is not absolute and can be overcome by an adequate showing of need for the information at issue.
The Kennedy Center’s board of trustees, composed of Trump administration officials and the president’s allies, elected Mr. Trump as its chairman last year, making him the first sitting president to hold the role. His effort to invoke executive privilege to shield records relating to the Kennedy Center raises new and untested questions of whether the protection extends to the president’s actions as chairman of the performing arts institution, which was created by Congress in 1958 and is funded through a mix of federal dollars, ticket revenue and private donations.
The president asserted executive privilege over a number of records relating to his attempt to close the Kennedy Center for two years to allow for renovations, its financial condition, the effort to add Mr. Trump’s name to the building’s facade and the possibility that the Kennedy Center could be demolished.
Concerns that the building could be razed emerged after Mr. Trump said last month that the Kennedy Center will close and “end up being ripped down” if he and his administration did not get recognition for raising money and spearheading repairs to the institution.
Mr. Trump was also photographed on Air Force One looking at a placard that appeared to say “Kennedy Center Demolished.”
The brewing fight over executive privilege comes as part of a lawsuit Beatty filed in December challenging the board’s move to change the center’s name to the Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts and shutter the institution for two years for renovations. Beatty is an ex officio member of the Kennedy Center’s Board of Trustees.
In May, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper blocked the center’s closure and ordered Mr. Trump’s name to be removed from the building’s facade. Construction crews stripped the president’s name from the exterior in June, but the front portico of the building has since been covered by a tarp, concealing most of its name.
Cooper has also allowed Beatty to collect information from the Kennedy Center about the decision to close the main building and any potential demolition, and to take depositions, a process known as discovery.
But Beatty’s lawyers said that the Justice Department sought to block her inquiries about any input and instructions Kennedy Center staff received from Mr. Trump in his capacity as the board’s chair and refused to turn over any documents related to those communications.
They accused the Justice Department of “improperly asserting a blanket privilege in an unprecedented fashion” and asked Cooper to order the Kennedy Center to turn over the material Beatty is seeking.
In response to Beatty’s inquiries, Justice Department lawyers said late last month that “to the extent the discovery requests seek communications involving the President or White House personnel, they are inappropriate because they may have the effect of seeking information protected by the presidential communications privilege.”
During a deposition with Matthew Floca, executive director and chief operating officer of the Kennedy Center, last week, a Justice Department lawyer repeatedly instructed Floca not to answer certain questions from one of Beatty’s lawyers based on a protective assertion of executive privilege.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/protesters-kennedy-center-trump-threatens-demolition/
Protesters gather outside Kennedy Center after Trump threatens demolition
(04:17)
发表回复