2026-10-05T10:00:45.153Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/05/politics/kfile-talarico-defund-police
2020年夏末,在乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀引发的全国抗议活动期间,得克萨斯州民主党州众议员詹姆斯·塔拉里科对一群进步派青年活动人士表示,“‘defund警察’被视为禁忌一事十分荒谬”,因为得州数十年来一直在削减公立学校和医疗服务的经费。
“作为一名教育工作者,我始终觉得荒谬的是,‘defund警察’在我们的政治辩论中被列为禁区,而数十年来,削减医疗服务经费、削减公立教育经费一直是我们州政府明确推行的政策,”塔拉里科对得州崛起组织(Texas Rising)的活动人士说道。该进步派倡导组织当时明确呼吁削减警察部门经费,并加大对社区替代方案的投入。
当时塔拉里科正在回应如何向陌生受众宣传将资金投入社区而非警务的议题,他承认“defund”这个口号在他所在的摇摆选区引发了强烈反对。他指出,该选区自他童年起就从未选出过民主党议员。
“你们知道的,‘defund警察’这样的标签在我的社区里引发了众怒,”塔拉里科说道。但当被问及武装警察是否应该处理轻微交通事故或精神健康危机时,塔拉里科表示,“大多数人都明白,我们不应该让警察承担这类职责。”
这些此前未被报道的言论,展现了塔拉里科在2020年抗议活动最激烈时期如何应对棘手的“defund警察”辩论:他避免认可这个政治上极具争议的口号,同时辩称如果用更具体的措辞来描述活动人士倡导的部分改革,选民可能会被说服支持。
如今正在竞选美国参议院的塔拉里科团队称,他曾支持削减警察经费是“彻头彻尾的谎言”,并指出他曾投票支持增加执法部门经费的州拨款法案。在给CNN的一份声明中,塔拉里科的团队重申了他反对削减警察经费的立场。
“詹姆斯从未呼吁也从未支持过削减警察经费,他强烈支持得克萨斯州执法人员和急救人员,”发言人JT·恩尼斯说道。“这就是为什么詹姆斯不仅倡导为心理健康资源提供更多资金,让警察不必处理本可以由心理咨询师应对的精神健康紧急事件,还投票向地方执法部门拨款数十亿美元。”
塔拉里科的团队告诉CNN,他在得州崛起组织的发言旨在批评那些攻击“defund警察”这句话,同时却支持削减其他公共事业经费的共和党人。团队表示,他后来的发言反对“defund”这个口号本身,而是提出了不涉及削减警察经费的具体政策。
塔拉里科在警务问题上的公开记录和言论,比他的绝对否认更为复杂。
从2019年至少到2022年,塔拉里科多次支持与更广泛的警务改革运动相关的论点和政策,包括限制警察权力、加大对社会服务和社区替代方案的投入,还曾明确主张减少警务和监狱开支。他还提议派遣“训练有素的危机干预人员”处理部分紧急事件。
其中许多言论都发表在“defund警察”运动的鼎盛时期,当时这个口号并没有统一的公认含义。
一些活动人士将其与废除或大幅削减传统警务联系起来,另一些人则用这个口号来描述将警察经费转向精神卫生保健、住房、教育和其他社会服务。这个口号很快拥有了独立的政治生命,成为共和党攻击民主党所谓极左翼议程的口实。
2020年,时任参议员卡玛拉·哈里斯(在被选为乔·拜登的副总统候选人之前)称赞这场运动迫使人们就高额警察预算是否符合正确优先事项展开辩论。2020年的其他人士,如现任密歇根州民主党参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德,也提出了类似的将警察开支转向公共服务的论点,并明确支持“defund警察”口号。
塔拉里科经常提出与哈里斯的解读相重合的论点,尽管他从未明确认可这个短语本身。
在2020年与支持defund警察的活动人士的通话中,塔拉里科赞扬了“黑人的命也是命”运动中的抗议者,称他们推动民选官员重新思考政府和警务的角色。
“我们总是要求抗议者保持非暴力,”他在得州崛起组织的通话中说道。“如果我们也要求政府保持非暴力呢?这个问题能带来哪些可能性?”他表示,“街头的声音,尤其是黑人和拉美裔的声音”,正在推动当权者“拓展我们的道德想象力”,并践行美国“公开宣称的理想”。
如今,随着他的参议院竞选活动试图吸引更广泛的选民,塔拉里科调整了自己的形象,并表示他2020年的许多言论“都偏离了目标”。在竞争激烈的参议院选举中,他将对阵丑闻缠身的得克萨斯州总检察长肯·帕克斯顿,这场选举可能决定明年哪个政党控制参议院,为此他已经撤回了对青少年跨性别权利和其他进步事业的支持。
塔拉里科早在弗洛伊德去世前就对过度依赖警察提出过质疑。
2019年,他批评了在学校增加警察警力却未相应投入精神健康专业人员的举措,称更多警察可能会加剧他所谓的“暴力文化”。
2020年5月弗洛伊德被谋杀后的几周里,他的言论变得更为激进。
在5月的脸书交流中,塔拉里科表示,他和其他议员将“继续推动限制警察权力的反种族主义立法”,同时推进有色人种社区的医疗、教育和经济正义事业。
在同一篇帖子的另一条回复中,民主党州众议员肖恩·特里耶呼吁警察“放下武器,与黑人公民并肩下跪”,并质问他们何时会为她所说的警察暴行、杀戮和滥用职权行为“受到约束”。塔拉里科点赞了这条评论并回复道:“我完全同意”,并补充说他致力于与特里耶合作“让你描述的景象成为现实”。
次月,在2019年德克萨斯州威廉姆森县哈维尔·安布勒二世被捕期间死亡的视频曝光后,塔拉里科呼吁取代现有的警务体系。
“我们的警务体系存在严重缺陷,”他说道。“我们必须用全新的、更好的体系取而代之。”
塔拉里科的团队告诉CNN,“这句话被断章取义了,它指的是警务类真人秀节目。”塔拉里科的团队还表示,他的脸书评论所指的是后来被称为《哈维尔·安布勒法案》的立法,该法案由塔拉里科牵头的两党法案,禁止得克萨斯州执法机构与真人秀节目签约。
2020年9月,当地出版物《诚实奥斯汀》直接询问塔拉里科关于defund警察的问题,他重申了团队所称被断章取义的论点,说道:“我们的警务体系存在严重缺陷,我们必须用全新的、更好的体系取而代之”,随后质疑是否每一次紧急事件都需要武装警察到场。
“如果我们不再带着枪支应对每一次紧急事件呢?”塔拉里科说道。“如果我们拨打三位数号码召唤训练有素的危机干预人员来处理社区问题呢?如果我们将康复、和解与恢复作为我们的行动原则呢?”
“我们需要投资于基于社区的解决方案,以解决我们要求警察处理的社会弊病:贫困、无家可归、药物滥用、精神健康障碍,”塔拉里科继续说道。“我们必须赋能我们的社区,而非对社区实施警务。只有这样,我们才能实现真正的公共安全。”
塔拉里科的团队告诉CNN,他当时是在主张为精神健康资源提供更多资金,这样警察就不必处理本可以由心理咨询师应对的精神健康紧急事件。
这场辩论在奥斯汀也同步上演,2020年8月,奥斯汀市议会通过的预算削减了警察部门约1.5亿美元的经费。
塔拉里科同期赞扬了奥斯汀地方领导人,并批评共和党州长格雷格·雅培惩罚削减警察经费的城市的举措。他还赞扬了结束他所谓的对有色人种社区“过度警务”的努力,称警察针对有色人种的暴力行为根植于奴隶制和吉姆克劳时代。
塔拉里科的团队告诉CNN,他当时是在“讨论州政府试图告诉地方政府如何管理市政的虚伪性,而保守派本应信奉小政府原则。”
塔拉里科的团队还在2020年6月向奥斯汀正义联盟捐赠了2500美元,该组织当时倡导削减奥斯汀警察预算,并将资金转向社会服务,以“defund”警察部门。
这笔捐款在他的连任竞选期间成为争议点,共和党人指责他协助削减警察经费。塔拉里科将这种攻击斥为“制造恐慌”,并为这笔捐款辩护,称奥斯汀正义联盟是“我们社区中备受尊敬的民权组织,倡导教育公平、经济机会和警务改革。”
2021年,塔拉里科反对奥斯汀的A提案,该提案要求该市每1000名居民至少配备两名警察,并强制额外雇佣数百名警察。塔拉里科敦促选民否决该提案,辩称“真正的公共安全”需要对社区进行投资。奥斯汀选民最终以压倒性优势否决了该提案。
2022年,塔拉里科将警务和监狱开支削减与社会项目支出增加联系起来。
“如果我们将用于战争、监狱和警务的资金拿出一半,用于教育、医疗和就业,我们就能让监狱变得多余,”塔拉里科在一场服刑学生毕业典礼上说道。“研究表明,扩大医疗补助覆盖范围会减少犯罪,增加SNAP福利会减少犯罪,教育会减少犯罪,清洁的空气和水会减少犯罪。一个不那么暴力的政府会造就一个不那么暴力的社会。”
What James Talarico told a pro-defund the police group in 2020
2026-10-05T10:00:45.153Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/05/politics/kfile-talarico-defund-police
In late summer 2020, as protests over the murder of George Floyd spread across the country, Texas Democratic state Rep. James Talarico told a group of young progressive activists that it was “rich” that “defund the police” was considered taboo when Texas had spent decades defunding public schools and health services.
“As an educator, it’s always rich to me that ‘defund the police’ is considered off-limits in our political debate, when defunding health services, defunding public education has been the stated policy of our state government for decades now,” Talarico told activists with Texas Rising, a progressive advocacy group that at the time was explicitly calling for police departments to be defunded and for greater investment in community-based alternatives.
Talarico, who was responding to a question on how to talk to unfamiliar audiences about the idea of investing in communities instead of policing, acknowledged that the “defund” slogan itself was getting a hostile reaction in his swing district, which he noted had not elected a Democrat since he was a child.
“You know, a hashtag like defund the police is getting people all riled up in my community,” Talarico said. But when people are asked whether armed police officers should respond to minor traffic accidents or mental-health crises, Talarico said, “Most people kind of understand that that’s not what we should be using police officers for.”
The previously unreported remarks offer a window into how Talarico approached the fraught “defund the police” debate at the height of the 2020 protests: avoiding endorsing the politically thorny slogan while also arguing that voters could be persuaded to support some of the changes being advocated by activists if they were described in more concrete terms.
Now running for the US Senate, Talarico’s campaign calls it a “flat-out lie” that he ever supported defunding the police and points to his votes for state appropriations bills that increased funding for law enforcement. And in a statement to CNN, Talarico’s campaign reiterated his opposition to defunding police.
“James did not call for and does not support defunding the police, and he strongly supports Texas law enforcement and first responders,” spokesperson JT Ennis said. “That’s why James has voted to send billions of dollars to local law enforcement, in addition to advocating for better-funded mental health resources so that cops don’t have to respond to mental health emergencies that could be handled by a counselor.”
Talarico’s campaign told CNN that his Texas Rising comments were meant to criticize Republicans who attack the phrase “defund the police” while supporting cuts to other public priorities. The campaign said his later comments argued against the phrase itself and instead proposed specific policies that it said did not involve defunding the police.
Talarico’s public record and rhetoric on policing is more nuanced than that categorical denial suggests.
From 2019 through at least 2022, Talarico repeatedly backed arguments and policies associated with the broader movement to rethink policing, including limiting police power, investing more heavily in social services and community-based alternatives, and one time explicitly arguing for spending less on policing and prisons. He also proposed sending “highly trained crisis interventionists” to some emergencies.
Many of those comments came at the height of the “defund the police” movement, when the phrase had no single accepted meaning.
While some activists tied it to abolishing or dramatically reducing traditional policing, others used the slogan to describe redirecting police funding toward mental healthcare, housing, education and other social services. The slogan quickly took on a political life of its own, becoming fodder for Republican attacks against a supposed far-left agenda item supported by Democrats.
In 2020, then-Sen. Kamala Harris, before she was tapped as Joe Biden’s vice presidential pick, praised the movement for forcing a debate over whether large police budgets reflected the right priorities. Others in 2020, such as Abdul El-Sayed, now the Democratic nominee for Senate in Michigan, made a similar case for redirecting police spending toward public services and explicitly embraced the “defund the police” slogan.
Talarico often made arguments that overlapped with Harris’ interpretation, even as he stopped short of explicitly embracing the phrase itself.
In his 2020 call with pro-defund activists, Talarico praised protesters in the Black Lives Matter movement for pushing elected officials to rethink the role of government and policing.
“We always expect protesters to be nonviolent,” he said on his Texas Rising call. “What happens if we expect our government to be nonviolent? What does that question open up in terms of possibility?” He said “the voices in the street, particularly Black and brown voices” were pushing those in power to “expand our moral imagination” and live up to the country’s “stated ideals.”
Now, as his Senate campaign seeks to appeal to a broader electorate, Talarico has moderated his image and said many of his 2020 comments “missed the mark.” He has walked back his support for youth transgender rights and other progressive causes as he faces scandal-plagued Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in a tight race that could help determine which party controls the Senate next year.
Talarico had questioned greater reliance on police even before Floyd’s death.
In 2019, he criticized efforts to increase police presence in schools without comparable investments in mental health professionals, arguing that more officers could contribute to what he called a “culture of violence.”
His rhetoric became more sweeping in the weeks after Floyd’s murder in May 2020.
In a May Facebook exchange, Talarico said he and other lawmakers would “continue to push anti-racist legislation that limits police power,” while promoting healthcare, education and economic justice in communities of color.
In another exchange on the same post, Democratic state Rep. Shawn Thierry called for police to “put down the weapons & kneel alongside Black citizens” and asked when they would be “brought to heel” over what she described as brutality, killings and abuses of police power. Talarico liked the comment and replied, “I couldn’t agree more,” adding that he was committed to work with Thierry “to make the imagery you described a reality.”
That next month, after the release of footage surrounding the death of Javier Ambler II during a 2019 arrest in Williamson County, Texas, Talarico called for replacing the existing policing system.
“Our system of policing is deeply broken,” he said. “We must replace it with something new and something better.”
Talarico’s campaign told CNN, “This quote is taken out of context. It refers to reality TV shows on policing.” Talarico’s campaign also said his Facebook comments were referring to legislation like what later became Javier Ambler’s Law, a bipartisan law sponsored by Talarico that barred Texas law enforcement agencies from contracting with reality television shows.
Asked directly about defunding the police by the local publication Honest Austin in September 2020, Talarico reiterated the same argument his campaign said had been taken out of context, saying, “Our system of policing is deeply broken. We must replace it with something new and something better,” before questioning whether armed officers were needed for every emergency.
“What if we stopped bringing a gun to every emergency?” Talarico said. “What if we called a three-digit number to summon highly trained crisis interventionists to address a problem in our neighborhood? What if we made rehabilitation, reconciliation, and restoration our operating principles?”
“We need to invest in community-based solutions that cure the societal ills that we ask the police to treat: poverty, homelessness, substance abuse, mental health disorders,” Talarico continued. “We must empower our communities, not police them. Only then will we have true public safety.”
Talarico’s campaign told CNN he was arguing for better funding for mental health resources so police don’t have to respond to mental health emergencies that could be handled by a counselor.
The debate was also playing out in real time in Austin, where city leaders approved a budget in August 2020 that cut roughly $150 million from the police department.
Talarico praised Austin’s local leaders during the same period and criticized Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s efforts to punish cities that reduced police funding. He also praised efforts to end what he called the “over-policing” of communities of color, saying police violence against people of color has its roots in slavery and Jim Crow.
Talarico’s campaign told CNN he was “discussing the hypocrisy of the state government trying to tell local governments how to run their municipalities when conservatives are supposed to believe in small government.”
Talarico’s campaign also contributed $2,500 in June 2020 to the Austin Justice Coalition, which was advocating cuts to Austin’s police budget and redirecting money toward social services and to “defund” the police department.
The donation became an issue in his reelection campaign after Republicans accused him of helping to defund police. Talarico dismissed the attack as “fearmongering” and defended the contribution, describing the Austin Justice Coalition as “a well-respected civil rights organization in our community that champions educational equity, economic opportunity, and police reform.”
In 2021, Talarico campaigned against Austin’s Proposition A, which would have required the city to maintain at least two police officers for every 1,000 residents and would have forced the hiring of hundreds of additional officers. Talarico urged voters to defeat the measure, arguing instead that “true public safety” required investment in communities. Austin voters ultimately rejected the proposal by wide margin.
And in 2022, Talarico connected reduced spending on policing and prisons with greater spending on social programs.
“If we took just half of what we spent on wars, prisons, and policing, and spent it on education, healthcare, and jobs, we could make prisons obsolete,” Talarico said at a graduation ceremony for incarcerated students. “Research tells us that expanding Medicaid reduces crime, increasing SNAP benefits reduces crime, education reduces crime, clean air and clean water reduces crime. A less violent government leads to a less violent society.”
发表回复