新一代候选人崛起,民主党在传统劣势州发起挑战


2026-10-02T04:01:44.949Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/02/politics/midterms-democrats-trump-unpopularity

唐纳德·特朗普总统支持率持续下滑,并非共和党今年秋季面临的唯一难题。

一批实力强劲的民主党候选人正将长期被认为将落入共和党手中的参议院席位争夺战拉入竞争态势。与此同时,多场关键选战中的共和党候选人表现疲软,可能让本就艰难的11月选举演变为共和党大选溃败。

历经多年难以争取选民的困境后,部分民主党新候选人拓宽了竞选战场,并开始纠正此前帮助特朗普赢得执政地位的定位、政策和话术失误。

这让民主党重新燃起净增四个席位以掌控参议院的希望,同时也让该党在本月拿下众议院多数席位的前景更加明朗。

在北卡罗来纳州,民调显示前两届州长罗伊·库珀在独立选民中颇受欢迎,且在农村地区具备足够竞争力,有望压缩共和党此前的优势空间。

更令人意外的是,艾奥瓦州州议员乔希·图雷克自称“常识性草原民粹主义者”,在这个特朗普两年前以13个百分点优势胜出的州,他正掀起激烈的竞选对决。

在佐治亚州,民主党参议员乔恩·奥索夫作为代表代际变革的候选人之一,通过对特朗普的尖锐批评塑造了鲜明的政治形象。他在摇摆州的选举胜利以及不断提升的全国知名度,引发外界猜测他可能成为民主党2028年总统竞选的理想人选。

在得克萨斯州,詹姆斯·塔利亚科佐正尝试将经济民粹主义与基督教信仰相结合,为民主党带来希望:该党30年来首次实现全州胜选的愿景或许即将成真。

在特朗普2024年轻松拿下的俄亥俄州,前参议员谢罗德·布朗发现,随着这位日益脱离民众的总统与亿万富翁们过从甚密,他一贯秉持的蓝领民粹主义主张恰逢其时。

这些候选人都在以各自的方式,试图超越特朗普的不受欢迎程度以及国民对经济的不安情绪;他们还在努力重塑民主党形象——近年来该党浪费了选民信任,导致部分核心选民倒向共和党总统。

今年对民主党而言,强大的候选人阵容尤为关键,因为美国民众整体仍对该党持负面看法。7月底的CNN/SSRS民调显示,民众在今年秋季的选举中以8个百分点的优势支持民主党,但国会两党的受欢迎程度不相上下,且外界对民主党若掌控国会可能取得的成果期望不高。

部分共和党候选人的选择并未助益选情

部分民主党人因共和党对手的问题而“捡漏”——比如佐治亚州的MAGA阵营众议员迈克·柯林斯,以及得克萨斯州深陷丑闻的州检察长肯·帕克斯顿,特朗普不顾共和党建制派领导人的反对,力挺这两人参选。在北卡罗来纳州,迈克尔·沃特利曾担任共和党全国委员会主席,在共和党圈内颇有知名度,但他仍需努力缩小与库珀的知名度差距。

有时即便被认为适配选区的候选人,也可能被局势拖累。在艾奥瓦州,共和党众议员阿什利·辛森曾是亲民的前电视主播,擅长沟通,始终关注该州的核心议题。通常情况下,她本应是乔尼·恩斯特即将空出的参议院席位的热门人选,但这个农业州正遭受特朗普关税和高燃油成本的重创。

当然,只要能获胜,任何候选人都能看起来像天才;而落选者总会被事后诸葛亮般地评头论足。

最引人关注的参议院选举或许在密歇根州,阿卜杜勒·赛义德是这场关键选战中风险最高的民主党候选人。如果他获胜,这位41岁的流行病学家将成为新一代政治力量的代表,也是进步派运动的明星。但如果前共和党众议员迈克·罗杰斯胜出,此前拒绝支持温和派众议员黑利·史蒂文斯的左翼民主党基础选民将被指责浪费了一个席位,甚至可能断送参议院的控制权。

兼具能力、纪律性和亲民性,同时能跨越意识形态界限的候选人,堪称稀缺资源。

但还有两个更为重要的特质:运气与时机。

缅因州共和党参议员苏珊·柯林斯向来仿佛拥有神话般的连任能力,但在当前共和党整体处境不佳的全国环境下,她正面临最艰难的连任竞选。特朗普时代的喧嚣损害了她独立派的声誉,迫使她在基本盘与温和派选民之间做出两难选择——比如她投票支持确认最高法院大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺。如今,她的民主党对手将她打上“特朗普帮凶”的标签,而非制衡特朗普的堡垒。

距离选举日还有一个月,一切尚未定论。

近期的参议院民调显示,得克萨斯州选情胶着;艾奥瓦州的局势对民主党稍有利;佐治亚州、北卡罗来纳州和俄亥俄州的竞选则整体偏向民主党。但选举往往在临近尾声时才见分晓。例如2024年,布朗在9月底还领先俄亥俄州(该州俗称“七叶树州”),最终却输给了伯尼·莫雷诺。还有谁会忘记《得梅因纪事报》/Mediacom的艾奥瓦州民调:副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯在选举前几天还领先特朗普,但最终却在这个州以决定性的差距落败?

但民主党人信心十足,因为中期选举最大的影响因素仍是现任总统的选情。特朗普的低支持率,以及美国人对高生活成本、人工智能和伊朗局势的担忧,让共和党候选人今年的竞选格外凶险。

“当总统所在政党掌控国会时,总统就是全民公投的对象,而该党及其候选人则是攻击目标,”北卡罗来纳州卡托巴学院政治与历史教授迈克尔·比策尔说道。

然而,政党在形势有利时搞砸选情的情况并不罕见。例如2022年,特朗普支持的宾夕法尼亚州的穆罕默德·奥兹和佐治亚州的赫歇尔·沃克等问题频出的候选人,帮助民主党在时任总统乔·拜登支持率低迷的情况下保住了参议院控制权。这也是部分民主党人担忧赛义德以及缅因州后期替换的候选人特洛伊·杰克逊选情的原因之一。

众议院的情况同样令人担忧。

部分民主党人担心,极左翼候选人在初选中胜出,可能推出了对选民来说过于激进的候选人,而共和党则警告“共产主义者”和“社会主义者”正在泛滥。这类胜选大多发生在深蓝州。但在特朗普2024年以微弱优势胜出的加利福尼亚州第22选区,民主党人兰迪·维列加斯击败了该党华盛顿领导层青睐的温和派初选对手。在缅因州,另一位进步派人士马特·邓拉普也击败了建制派对手,赢得了关键摇摆选区的大选参选资格。

11月库珀或图雷克的胜选,可能为民主党提供重要线索,帮助他们在2024年以来因移民、性别认同议题和通胀政策失去部分温和选民后,扩大选民吸引力。

进入21世纪以来,民主党在文化议题上的宣传往往吸引了自由派城市和郊区受过大学教育的选民,却疏远了农村和工薪阶层选民——这些选民原本自然会支持民主党,后来却倒向了特朗普。

库珀或许是南方某州的解决方案。

这位前州长并未开展明显带有党派色彩的民主党竞选活动。他将自己的参选定位为北卡罗来纳州向参议院派出“独立”声音的契机。他以此次选举的核心议题——负担能力——为桥梁,通过“让东西更便宜”的巡回竞选活动和“钱总不够花”之类的口号,争取两党选民。库珀多年的公职生涯为他赢得了温和派的信任。他给人的印象沉稳低调,在争取厌倦了特朗普式混乱的选民时,还提及自己曾与州议会共和党人合作的经历。

这种策略似乎奏效,民调显示他领先沃特利的优势明显。比策尔开展的民调印证了其他民调的结果:库珀在独立选民中支持率领先,他在农村地区的表现也远胜以往——在这个自2008年巴拉克·奥巴马以来从未选出过民主党总统候选人的州,共和党通常在农村地区优势巨大。

这种联盟格局至关重要,因为民调显示,尽管选民希望惩罚特朗普,但他们仍对民主党持怀疑态度。这也是选举专家查理·库克认为,此次中期选举并非“蓝色浪潮”,而是“红色潜流”的原因之一。

比策尔表示,库珀的从政经历让他“明白在北卡罗来纳州……温和派中间派可以决定选举走向。他知道如何既争取本党的基础选民,又吸引那些可能分裂选票的温和派中间派”。

图雷克在艾奥瓦州尝试了类似策略。他援引温和派民主党人、曾在国会任职40年的艾奥瓦州参议员汤姆·哈金的遗产——该州曾两次支持奥巴马,三次支持特朗普。他强调了严峻的负担能力危机、医疗服务匮乏、全州高发的癌症率,以及他所谓的华盛顿“腐败”。但图雷克基本避开了全国民主党和进步派宣传核心中的文化和社会议题。他支持第二修正案和严格的边境政策。

“民主党形象确实受损了,”图雷克在最近一档与乔恩·斯图尔特合作的《每周秀》节目中谈及自己作为艾奥瓦州议员的意识形态定位时说道,“有些时候,我在某些议题上与温和派共和党人的共识,比与最极端的左翼民主党人还要多。”

这种立场可能帮助图雷克抵御共和党关于民主党正滑向极左翼阵营的指控。

如果这一竞选策略在今年秋季取得成功,可能为民主党提供一份可复制的蓝图,其意义不仅限于此次中期选举。

With a new breed of candidate, Democrats are challenging in states they usually lose

2026-10-02T04:01:44.949Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/02/politics/midterms-democrats-trump-unpopularity

President Donald Trump’s flagging popularity isn’t the only problem Republicans face this fall.

A slate of strong Democratic hopefuls is putting in play Senate races long assumed to be heading for the Republican column. Stumbling GOP candidates in several pivotal contests, meanwhile, threaten to turn a tough November into an electoral collapse.

After years of struggling to connect with voters, some Democratic recruits have expanded the battlefield and are beginning to redress the failures in positioning, policy and language that helped fuel Trump’s dominance.

This is giving the party resurgent hopes of the net gain of four seats it needs to control the Senate, even as it moves into prime position to win a House majority next month.

In North Carolina, polls show two-term former Gov. Roy Cooper is popular with independents and is sufficiently competitive in rural areas to dent GOP margins.

In a more surprising turn, Iowa state legislator Josh Turek, a self-declared “common sense prairie populist,” is making a race of it in a state where the president romped home by 13 points only two years ago.

In Georgia, Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff, another candidate representing generational change, has created a distinct political persona with disdainful critiques of Trump. His swing-state success and rising national profile have stirred speculation he may be what his party is looking for in the 2028 presidential campaign.

In Texas, James Talarico is testing out a bespoke infusion of economic populism and Christian faith to conjure Democratic hopes that the ever-shimmering mirage of a statewide victory can become reality for the first time in 30 years.

In Ohio, which Trump won at a canter in 2024, former Sen. Sherrod Brown has found that his perennial message of blue-collar populism is meeting its moment as an increasingly distant president pals around with billionaires.

Each of these candidates, is, in their own ways, seeking to capture something beyond Trump’s unpopularity and a sense of national economic unease; they are also trying to reinvent the brand of a party that squandered voter trust in recent years and drove some of its core voters toward the Republican president.

A roster of strong candidates is especially important to Democrats this year because the country still views the party largely negatively. A CNN/SSRS survey in late July showed that the public favors Democrats this fall by 8 points, but congressional Democrats and Republicans are about equally unpopular and there are low hopes for what possible Democratic majorities might achieve.

Some GOP candidate choices aren’t helping

Some Democrats lucked out with problematic GOP opponents — like MAGA champion Rep. Mike Collins in Georgia and scandal-plagued Attorney General Ken Paxton in Texas, who were backed by Trump over the reservations of establishment GOP leaders. In North Carolina, Michael Whatley is well known within GOP circles as a former Republican National Committee chair, but he has toiled to match Cooper’s name recognition.

Sometimes circumstances threaten to overwhelm even candidates regarded as well suited to their races. In Iowa, GOP Rep. Ashley Hinson, a relatable former TV anchor and strong communicator, is immersed in the state’s key issues. She’d normally be a favorite to win the Senate seat soon to be vacated by Joni Ernst, but the farm state is being hammered by Trump’s tariffs and high fuel costs.

Of course, any candidate can look like a genius if they win. And losers are always second-guessed.

The most intriguing Senate race may be in Michigan, where Abdul El-Sayed is the most high-risk Democratic candidate in a critical race. If he wins, the 41-year-old epidemiologist will be a herald of a new political generation and star of the progressive movement. But if former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers prevails, left-wing Democratic base voters who rejected the more moderate Rep. Haley Stevens will be accused of throwing away a seat, and possibly the Senate.

Candidates who blend skill, discipline and relatability while crossing ideological lines are like gold dust.

But there are two even more important qualities: luck and timing.

Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins has often seemed to possess mythical survival qualities. But she’s facing her toughest reelection race yet in a dark national environment for Republicans. The clamor of the Trump era has roughed up her reputation for independence and forced choices that drag her between her base and more moderate voters — like her vote to confirm Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Now she’s being branded by her Democratic opponent as an enabler of Trump rather than a bulwark against him.

Nothing is settled a month from Election Day.

Recent Senate polls show no clear leader in Texas; a slightly better picture for Democrats in Iowa; and campaigns mostly leaning toward the party in Georgia, North Carolina and Ohio. But races often narrow late. In 2024, for instance, Brown led in the Buckeye state in late September but ended up losing his Senate seat to Bernie Moreno. And who can forget the Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll that showed Vice President Kamala Harris beating Trump a few days before he trounced her in that state by the only measure that actually matters?

But Democrats are confident because the biggest influence on a midterm election remains the fortunes of the incumbent president. Trump’s low approval numbers and Americans’ concerns about high living costs, AI and the Iran war make this an especially dicey year for GOP candidates.

“When the president’s party controls Congress, the president is the referendum, but the party and their candidates are the targets,” said Michael Bitzer, a professor of politics and history at Catawba College in North Carolina.

Yet it’s not unusual for parties to fumble while in a good position. Trump’s backing for error-prone candidates like Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania and Herschel Walker in Georgia in 2022, for example, helped Democrats cling onto the Senate despite then-President Joe Biden’s unpopularity. This is one reason why some in the party worry about the prospects of El-Sayed and the late replacement nominee Troy Jackson in Maine.

This is also a worry in the House.

Some Democrats fear that primary victories by ultra-progressive candidates may have produced nominees too radical for the electorate as the GOP warns that “communists” and “socialists” are running rampant. Most of these wins were in deeply blue states. But in California’s 22nd District, a key battleground that Trump narrowly won in 2024, Democrat Randy Villegas defeated a moderate primary rival preferred by the party’s Washington leaders. And in Maine, another progressive, Matt Dunlap, also defeated an establishment rival for the right to run in a key general election swing district.

Victories by Cooper or Turek in November could give Democrats important clues about how they widen their appeal after a period up to 2024 in which their policies on immigration, gender identity issues and inflation drove away some moderate voters.

Often, in the 21st century, the party’s cultural messaging appealed to the liberal cities and college-educated voters in the suburbs but alienated rural and working-class voters who once turned naturally to Democrats but deserted the party for Trump.

Cooper may be their answer in one Southern state.

The former governor is not running an overtly partisan Democratic campaign. He presents his candidacy as a chance for North Carolina to send an “independent” voice to the Senate. He’s using the key issue of the election — affordability — as a bridge to voters of both parties with his “Make Stuff Cost Less” tours and slogans like, “There is too much month at the end of the money.” Cooper’s earned the trust of moderates over long years in public office. He comes across as steady and understated and remembers working with Republicans in the state legislature as he courts voters who’ve tired of Trump’s chaos.

It seems to be working, with polls suggesting he holds a comfortable lead over Whatley. Bitzer, who has conducted polling that confirms findings in other surveys that Cooper leads among independents, says the former governor also does far better in rural areas where the GOP typically pads out wins in a state that hasn’t voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since Barack Obama in 2008.

This kind of coalition is important because polls show that while voters are looking to punish Trump, they are still skeptical of Democrats. This is one reason why elections expert Charlie Cook argues the midterms are seeing not a blue wave but a “red undertow.”

Bitzer said that Cooper’s experience equips him to “recognize that (in) North Carolina … that moderate middle can tip one way or the other. And he knows how to appeal both to his party’s base, but also to that moderate middle that may split their tickets.”

Turek is trying something similar in Iowa. He’s evoking the legacy of moderate Democratic Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, who served 40 years in Congress for a state that went twice for Barack Obama and three times for Trump. He’s stressing the punishing affordability crisis, poor access to healthcare, high rates of cancer in the state and what he calls Washington “corruption.” But Turek largely avoids cultural and social issues at the center of much national Democratic and progressive messaging. He supports the Second Amendment and a strong border policy.

“The Democratic brand is certainly damaged,” Turek said on a recent edition of “The Weekly Show” with Jon Stewart, describing his ideological positioning as a member of Iowa’s state legislature. “There are times where I have more agreement with my moderate Republicans on issues than with my most extreme left-wing Democrats,” he said.

That stance may help shield Turek against GOP claims that the Democratic Party is careening toward its far-left flank.

And if the message is a winner this fall, it may provide the party with a blueprint that stretches beyond the midterms.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2