2026年10月1日 美国东部时间上午10:07 / 福克斯新闻
该案在纽约州州长凯西·霍楚尔的赦免似乎破坏了特朗普政府试图解决长期拘留是否需要保释听证会的争议后，再次被提交至最高法院。
作者：伊莱恩·马伦 福克斯新闻
发布于 2026年10月1日 上午10:07 EDT | 更新于 2026年10月1日 上午11:27 EDT
前司法部官员警告“博弈手段”，移民拘留争议升至最高法院
查德·米泽尔辩称，允许在拘留数月后举行保释听证会，将助长拖延战术，并增加刑事移民弃保潜逃的风险。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章！
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-hear-challenge-trumps-mass-detention-policy
收听本文
2分钟
最高法院周四同意受理对美国移民与海关执法局（ICE）强制拘留政策的重大挑战，此前特朗普政府已要求大法官们审查此案。
该案的结果将决定某些在等待驱逐程序期间被移民拘留的非公民是否有权获得保释听证会，这一问题已经在联邦上诉法院之间产生分歧。
九家联邦上诉法院驳回了特朗普政府对1996年《非法移民改革和移民责任法》的解释。目前提交至最高法院的案件源于美国第二巡回上诉法院的一项裁决。第五和第八巡回上诉法院则持相反观点，裁定特朗普政府可以要求对某些非公民——包括非法移民和面临驱逐的合法永久居民——实施强制拘留，而无需为他们提供保释听证会。
该案的核心人物是巴西公民里卡多·阿帕雷西多·巴尔博萨·达·库尼亚，他在20多年前未经检查进入美国，2016年申请庇护，并在申请待审期间获得了工作许可。移民与海关执法局于2025年9月逮捕了他，并辩称在其驱逐案件审理期间，他应被强制拘留且无需保释听证会。
巴尔博萨·达·库尼亚挑战了政府对联邦移民法的解释，辩称对他的拘留应适用另一项条款，该条款允许移民法官举行保释听证会。地区法院支持了他的主张，第二巡回上诉法院也予以维持。
地区法院裁定，巴尔博萨·达·库尼亚有权获得保释听证会，因为对他的拘留应适用《移民和国籍法》的另一项条款。随后一名移民法官认定他不存在弃保潜逃风险或对社区构成危险，并下令以保释方式释放他。
口头辩论预计将于本庭审期晚些时候举行。
本报道正在持续更新中。
伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的撰稿人，报道全国政治新闻。
Supreme Court to scrutinize key pillar of Trump deportation machine in blockbuster case
2026-10-01 10:07am EDT / Fox News
The case returns to the Supreme Court after Gov. Kathy Hochul’s pardon appeared to derail the Trump administration’s effort to resolve whether lengthy detention requires bond hearings.
By Elaine Mallon Fox News
Published October 1, 2026 10:07am EDT | Updated October 1, 2026 11:27am EDT
Former DOJ official warns of ‘gamesmanship’ as immigration detention battle reaches Supreme Court
Chad Mizelle argues that allowing bond hearings after several months of detention would incentivize delay tactics and increase the risk that criminal migrants abscond.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-hear-challenge-trumps-mass-detention-policy
Listen to this article
2 min
The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to hear a blockbuster challenge to ICE’s mandatory detention policy after the Trump administration asked the justices to review the case.
The outcome of this case will determine whether certain noncitizens held in immigration detention while awaiting deportation are entitled to bond hearings, an issue that has divided the federal appeals courts.
Nine federal appeals courts have rejected the Trump administration’s interpretation of the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. The case now before the Supreme Court stems from a ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The 5th and 8th U.S. Circuits have taken the opposite view, ruling that the Trump administration may require the mandatory detention of certain noncitizens — including illegal immigrants and lawful permanent residents facing deportation — without offering them bond hearings.
The case before the Supreme Court centers on Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa da Cunha, a Brazilian citizen who entered the United States without inspection more than two decades ago, applied for asylum in 2016 and was granted work authorization while his application was pending. ICE arrested him in September 2025 and argued he was subject to mandatory detention without a bond hearing while his removal case proceeded.
John Sauer, then a special assistant attorney general at the Louisiana Department of Justice, speaks during a House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government hearing.(Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Barbosa da Cunha challenged the government’s interpretation of federal immigration law, arguing his detention was governed by a different provision that permits immigration judges to hold bond hearings. The district court agreed, and the 2nd U.S. Circuit affirmed.
The district court ruled Barbosa da Cunha was entitled to a bond hearing because his detention was governed by a different provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act. An immigration judge later found he did not pose a flight risk or danger to the community and ordered him released on bond.
Oral arguments are expected to be held later this term.
This story is developing and will be updated.
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
发表回复