2026年9月27日 美国东部时间早上6:00 / 福克斯新闻
案件核心为一名有四次定罪记录的多米尼加公民，在移民海关执法局拘留期间抗辩递解程序
作者：伊莱恩·马伦，福克斯新闻
前司法部官员警告“博弈手段”，移民拘留争议升级至最高法院
查德·米泽尔辩称，允许在拘留数月后举行保释听证会将助长拖延战术，增加刑事移民弃保潜逃的风险。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
法律专家警告，一场关于有犯罪记录的非公民在漫长的递解出境程序中是否有权获得保释听证会的最高法院之争，可能会成为公共安全隐患，使联邦政府更难将部分被拘留者关押在狱中。
特朗普政府正要求大法官受理吉纳洛诉哥伦比亚特区案（Genalo v. D.C.），该案涉及一名有四次犯罪记录的多米尼加公民，他在抗辩递解程序期间被移民和海关执法局拘留。
这场争议围绕第二巡回法院的一项先例展开，该先例要求在强制移民拘留变得“不合理地延长”时举行保释听证会。在该听证会上，政府必须以明确且令人信服的证据证明被拘留者有弃保潜逃风险或对社区构成危险。
携带弯刀的MS-13帮派成员被控谋杀，拜登任命法官将其释放：国土安全部
查德·米泽尔是美国优先政策研究所诉讼委员会主席，曾任代理副司法部长和司法部办公厅主任，他告诉福克斯新闻数字频道，此案的影响超出了移民法范畴。
“我们这里讨论的是刑事外侨，”米泽尔说。“这些人是被指控或已定罪的严重重罪罪犯。被指控或已定罪谋杀。被指控或已定罪对儿童实施性侵。被指控或已定罪对他人造成严重伤害。”
“所以这些都是最恶劣的罪犯，”米泽尔继续说道。“我们真的想让这些人走上街头，再次犯罪，伤害其他人吗？”
米泽尔辩称，国会曾对某些有犯罪记录的非公民实施强制拘留，以确保他们在递解程序期间被关押，但第二巡回法院的延长拘留规则可能会怂恿部分被拘留者拖延案件，争取获得保释。
司法部行动起来，剥夺17名被控隐瞒恶劣罪行的公民国籍
根据法庭记录，此次政府最新请愿书中的核心人物，法庭文件中以“D.C.”指代的男子，是一名62岁的多米尼加公民，他非法进入美国，并有四次犯罪定罪记录。
1997年，D.C.被指控多项毒品罪行，包括贩卖和持有受控物质。他未出庭受审，被陪审团定罪并缺席判处三至九年监禁，但直到2024年才开始服刑。2007年，他因向警方出示虚假身份证明被控持有伪造文书，再次未出庭应诉。
2016年，D.C.因一起家庭纠纷面临多项指控，包括二级 strangulation（扼颈）、三级袭击以及伤害17岁以下儿童的行为。他对妨碍呼吸或血液循环的刑事罪名认罪，并以认罪答辩了结了此前的伪造文书案。同年晚些时候，他承认犯有刑事藐视法庭罪。
D.C.最终于2024年4月因1998年毒品定罪的未执行逮捕令被捕。2025年9月服完州刑期后，移民海关执法局立即将其拘留，其递解程序仍在进行中。
联邦上诉法院将特朗普的移民拘留政策与日裔美国人监禁相提并论
华盛顿特区——3月17日：2025年3月17日，美国最高法院在华盛顿特区的景象。特朗普政府上周六无视联邦法官的法院命令，涉及根据1789年《敌对外侨法》将200多名据称的阿拉瓜火车帮派成员递解回萨尔瓦多的案件。（温·麦克纳梅/盖蒂图片社摄）
地区法院随后根据具有约束力的第二巡回法院先例下令为D.C.举行保释听证会，但驳回了他立即获释的单独请求。政府现在要求最高法院在第二巡回法院本身作出裁决之前受理此案——这是一种不寻常的程序，称为“判决前调卷令”。
在同一场法律斗争中的另外两名非公民的案件变得无实际意义后，政府转向了D.C.的案件。
其中一人是卡罗尔·威廉姆斯·布莱克，他被拘留了约七个月。在他获得最终递解令并永久离开美国后，他的案件变得无实际意义。布莱克曾在2000年因性侵儿童被定罪。因此，最高法院仅在6月就第二名被拘留者G.M.的案件批准了复审。
G.M.是来自多米尼加共和国的合法永久居民，2015年5月对二级袭击罪认罪，此前他被指控在2012年纽约市的一起事件中袭击并抢劫一名男子。他被判处两年监禁，2016年12月服刑19个月后提前假释出狱。移民海关执法局于2020年10月5日在G.M.家中将其逮捕，并在递解程序进行期间将其拘留了21个月，未举行保释听证会。
特朗普对罕见使用的18世纪驱逐法的斗争在最新法庭冲突中持续
最高法院原定于10月13日审理他的案件。但在8月下旬，纽约州民主党州长凯西·霍楚尔为G.M.的袭击定罪颁发了全面且无条件的赦免，而这一定罪正是其递解程序和强制拘留的依据。副司法部长约翰·佐尔同意此案已无实际意义，最高法院于9月11日驳回了此案，未就实质问题作出裁决。
随后，政府将D.C.确定为替代案件，并要求大法官们在本届任期内审理相同的宪法问题。
2025年10月24日，纽约市曼哈顿的美国移民法庭，联邦移民官员在等候听证会当事人离场以进行针对性拘留时进行磋商。（大卫·“迪”·德尔加多/路透社摄）
联邦法官的裁决限制了ICE特工在南加州无逮捕令逮捕的行动
司法危机网络（JCN）主席凯莉·塞维里诺表示，这场争议可能会影响全国许多类似的移民案件。
“这不是一个只会影响本案中被指控的多米尼加刑事外侨D.C.的问题，”塞维里诺告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“这是一个将影响全国所有刑事外侨的问题。”
塞维里诺表示，D.C.胜诉将给政府带来新的障碍，包括额外的听证会和资源投入。
“众所周知，移民案件中，不出庭参加法庭日期的情况极为普遍，”她补充道。“我认为法院不应该经常批准让人们仅凭承诺就获得保释，因为他们明明知道这些人很可能会被递解出境，却还是会弃保潜逃。”
2025年6月26日星期四，纽约市联邦广场法院内，数十名移民被美国移民和海关执法局（ICE）特工拘留，此前他们完成了法律程序。这些逮捕行动在法庭出庭后不久进行，引发了移民权利倡导者的批评，他们称法庭执法破坏了正当程序，并阻止社区成员寻求法律保护。（洛克曼·武拉尔·埃利博尔/安纳多卢通讯社 via 盖蒂图片社摄）
本案还提出了谁必须证明继续拘留是否必要的问题。第二巡回法院裁定，政府必须以明确且令人信服的证据证明被拘留者应继续被关押。
“因此，如果最高法院最终维持第二巡回法院的裁决，那就意味着政府将更难拘留这部分刑事外侨或与恐怖主义有关的外侨，”佛罗里达州立大学法学教授迈克尔·莫利告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“在某些情况下，政府将无法以更高标准或明确且令人信服的标准证明某个人很可能潜逃或构成危险。”
“这意味着这些已经处于递解程序中的刑事外侨，在递解程序缓慢通过审判程序期间，更有可能被释放到社区中，”莫利继续说道。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
最高法院尚未同意受理D.C.的案件。
伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的撰稿人，报道全国政治。
SCOTUS detention fight could unleash dangerous criminal migrants onto US streets, experts warns
September 27, 2026 6:00am EDT / Fox News
The case centers on a Dominican citizen with four convictions held in ICE detention while fighting removal proceedings
By Elaine Mallon, Fox News
Former DOJ official warns of ‘gamesmanship’ as immigration detention battle reaches Supreme Court
Chad Mizelle argues that allowing bond hearings after several months of detention would incentivize delay tactics and increase the risk that criminal migrants abscond.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
A Supreme Court battle over whether certain noncitizens with criminal records are entitled to bond hearings during lengthy deportation proceedings could become a public safety concern by making it harder for the federal government to keep some detainees behind bars, legal experts warn.
The Trump administration is asking the justices to take up Genalo v. D.C., a case involving a Dominican citizen with four criminal convictions who has been detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement while fighting removal.
The dispute centers on a Second Circuit precedent requiring a bond hearing when mandatory immigration detention becomes “unreasonably prolonged.” At that hearing, the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the detainee poses a flight risk or danger to the community.
MACHETE-WIELDING MS-13 GANGSTER WANTED FOR MURDER WALKS FREE AFTER BIDEN-APPOINTED JUDGE RELEASES HIM: DHS
Chad Mizelle, chair of litigation at the America First Policy Institute and a former acting associate attorney general and Justice Department chief of staff, told Fox News Digital the implications extend beyond immigration law.
“We are talking about criminal aliens here,” Mizelle said. “Those are individuals who have been accused of or convicted of an aggravated felony. Accused or convicted of murder. Accused or convicted of child rape. Accused or convicted of grievous harm upon another human being.”
Federal agents detain a man after attending a court hearing in immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on June 30, 2025 in New York City.((Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images))
“So these are the worst of the worst individuals,” Mizelle continued. “Do we want those individuals walking the streets, re-committing, harming other individuals?”
Mizelle argued Congress imposed mandatory detention on certain noncitizens with criminal records to keep them detained during removal proceedings, while the Second Circuit’s prolonged-detention rule could incentivize some detainees to drag out their cases long enough to seek bond.
DOJ MOVES TO STRIP CITIZENSHIP FROM 17 PEOPLE ACCUSED OF HIDING DISTURBING CRIMES
The man at the center of the administration’s latest petition, identified in court papers as D.C., is a 62-year-old Dominican citizen who illegally entered the United States and has four criminal convictions, according to court records.
In 1997, D.C. was charged with multiple drug offenses, including selling and possessing a controlled substance. He failed to appear for trial, was convicted by a jury and sentenced in absentia to three to nine years in prison, but did not serve that sentence until 2024. In 2007, he was charged with possessing a forged instrument after presenting false identification to police and again failed to appear in court.
In 2016, D.C. faced several charges stemming from a domestic dispute, including second-degree strangulation, third-degree assault and acting in a manner to injure a child under 17. He pleaded guilty to criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation and also resolved his earlier forged-instrument case with a guilty plea. Later that year, he pleaded guilty to criminal contempt.
D.C. was finally arrested on the outstanding warrant from his 1998 drug conviction in April 2024. After completing his state sentence in September 2025, ICE immediately detained him while his removal proceedings continued.
FEDERAL APPEALS COURT COMPARES TRUMP MIGRANT DETENTION POLICY TO JAPANESE AMERICAN INTERNMENT
WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 17: The U.S. Supreme Court is shown March 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration defied a federal judge’s court order this past weekend in a case related to the deportation of more than 200 alleged Tren de Aragua gang members to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act of 1789.(Win McNamee/Getty Images)
The district court subsequently ordered that D.C. receive a bond hearing under binding Second Circuit precedent but denied his separate request for immediate release. The government is now asking the Supreme Court to take the case before the Second Circuit itself rules — an unusual procedure known as certiorari before judgment.
The administration turned to D.C.’s case after two other noncitizens at the center of the same legal fight saw their cases become moot.
One, Carol Williams Black, had been detained for roughly seven months. His case became moot after he received a final order of removal and permanently left the United States. Black was convicted of sexually abusing a child in 2000. The Supreme Court therefore granted review in June only as to the second detainee, G.M.
G.M., a lawful permanent resident from the Dominican Republic, pleaded guilty to second-degree assault in May 2015 after being accused of attacking and robbing a man during a 2012 incident in New York City. He was sentenced to two years in prison and was released early on parole in December 2016 after serving 19 months. ICE arrested G.M. at his home on Oct. 5, 2020, and detained him for 21 months without a bond hearing while removal proceedings continued.
TRUMP’S FIGHT OVER RARELY USED 18TH-CENTURY DEPORTATION LAW LIVES ON IN LATEST COURT CLASH
The Supreme Court was scheduled to hear his case Oct. 13. But in late August, New York Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul granted G.M. a full and unconditional pardon for the assault conviction that had formed the basis for his deportation proceedings and mandatory detention. Solicitor General John Sauer agreed the case was moot, and the Supreme Court dismissed it Sept. 11 without ruling on the merits.
The administration then identified D.C. as its replacement vehicle and asked the justices to hear the same constitutional questions this term.
Federal immigration officers consult as they wait for respondents to depart from their hearings to conduct targeted detainments at U.S. immigration court in Manhattan, in New York City, Oct. 24, 2025.(David ‘Dee’ Delgado/Reuters)
FEDERAL JUDGE TIES ICE AGENTS’ HANDS WITH RULING ON WARRANTLESS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ARRESTS
Carrie Severino, president of Judicial Crisis Network (JCN), said the dispute is likely to affect many similar immigration cases nationwide.
“This is not a question that’s only going to affect D.C., the criminal Dominican national at issue in this case,” Severino told Fox News Digital. “This is an issue that’s going to affect criminal aliens across the country.”
A victory by D.C. would impose new hurdles on the government, including additional hearings and use of resources, Severino said.
“As we know, immigration cases, skipping out on showing up for court dates is incredibly common,” she added. “This is not something that I think the court ought to be granting on a regular basis that they’d be letting people out on bond simply on their word that they’re going to be coming back when they know that they are likely to be removed.”
Dozens of immigrants are detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents inside the Federal Plaza courthouse in New York City on Thursday, June 26, following their legal proceedings. The arrests, which took place shortly after court appearances, have sparked criticism from immigrant rights advocates, who say courthouse enforcement undermines due process and deters community members from seeking legal protection.(Lokman Vural Elibol/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The case also raises questions about who must prove whether continued detention is necessary. The Second Circuit ruled that the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that a detainee should remain in custody.
“And so, if the Supreme Court winds up affirming what the Second Circuit held, that means it’s going to be harder for the government to be able to detain this particular population of criminal aliens or terrorism-linked aliens,” Florida State University law professor Michael Morley told Fox News Digital. “There are going to be situations where the government is not able to show that a particular person is either likely to flee or poses a risk of danger and this dangerousness by a heightened or clear and convincing standard.”
“It means that these criminal aliens who are already subject to removal proceedings are more likely to be released into the community while those underlying removal proceedings continue to make their way slowly through the adjudicative process,” Morley continued.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear D.C.’s case.
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
发表回复