2026-09-24T17:07:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻（CBS News）
作者：卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯（Camilo Montoya-Galvez）
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯 移民事务通讯员
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔维亚是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的移民事务通讯员，其报道在多个节目和平台播出，包括全国广播节目、CBS News 24/7、CBSNews.com以及该机构的社交媒体账号。
阅读完整简历
更新时间：2026年9月24日 / 美国东部时间下午5:12 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
周四，特朗普政府在一项紧急请求中敦促最高法院恢复将部分移民驱逐至非原籍国的政策。此前下级法院以该政策侵犯被驱逐者的正当程序权利为由，裁定这一做法违宪。
美国司法部请求最高法院暂停一名联邦法官2026年2月作出的裁决，该裁决在上周基本获得上诉法院支持，要求联邦移民官员向被驱逐者提供更多正当程序保障。法院表示，在试图将被驱逐者遣送至所谓的“第三国”且他们与该国无任何关联之前，必须向其发出通知并给予他们质疑驱逐决定的机会。
如果暂停执行该裁决，国土安全部将得以继续推行一项政策：只要接收国作出全面保证，不会迫害或酷刑对待被驱逐者，当局即可将被拘留者遣送至第三国，且无需向他们发出通知或给予质疑驱逐决定的机会。
司法部律师表示，在波士顿联邦法院作出不利裁决后，国土安全部已经取消了一架搭载70名拟被驱逐者前往三个第三国的航班，其中部分人员有犯罪记录。
在紧急上诉中，美国副检察长D.约翰·佐尔（D. John Sauer）写道，近几个月来，第三国遣返政策已帮助特朗普政府将数千名移民驱逐出境。他估计还有“数千人”符合被遣送至第三国的条件。
“其中包括一些罪大恶极的外籍罪犯——他们的祖国拒绝接收他们，”他写道。“下级法院的裁决将再次阻碍国土安全部高效遣返外籍人员——此次是一项已实施15个月的政策，而此前的法院命令已导致该政策中断。”
佐尔还表示，下级法院的判决“损害了我们的海外地位”。
“寻找愿意且有能力接收外籍人员的第三国是一项微妙的外交工作，”佐尔写道。“下级法院插手这一进程，可能破坏精心谈判达成的协议，这‘将对美国外交政策造成重大且不可挽回的损害’。”
负责马萨诸塞州及该地区其他州紧急上诉案件的大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊（Ketanji Brown Jackson）给予挑战该政策的移民律师团队至周一下午的时间作出回应。
佐尔请求杰克逊在政府考虑紧急上诉期间，为其提供临时救济。
作为针对非法移民的大范围打击行动的一部分，特朗普政府已与全球数十个国家达成协议，主要集中在非洲和拉丁美洲，这些国家同意接收并非本国公民的美国被驱逐者。
同意接收此类被驱逐者的部分非洲国家存在专制政府、武装冲突、侵犯人权现象和普遍贫困问题，例如赤道几内亚、中非共和国和南苏丹。
尽管斯威士兰和南苏丹等国接收过有暴力和严重犯罪前科的特朗普政府遣返移民，但利比里亚等其他国家接收的被驱逐移民除在美国有移民违规记录外，并无其他已知犯罪记录，这些移民来自拉丁美洲和世界其他地区。
在利比里亚，哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访了上月被遣送至这个西非国家的巴西、哥伦比亚、危地马拉、洪都拉斯和委内瑞拉籍男女移民，他们表示自己感觉无国籍。所有人都称，他们在未收到提前通知或获得质疑驱逐决定机会的情况下，被遣送至西非。
移民官员在第三国遣返行动中主要针对两类人员：一类是在美国移民法庭获得有限法律保护、禁止移民海关执法局（ICE）将其遣返回国的移民，另一类是其祖国限制或拒绝美国遣返的被拘留者。
这场关于第三国遣返的争议此前已提交至最高法院，不过是在案件的更早阶段。
去年，最高法院以分歧裁决允许特朗普政府在法律程序进行期间恢复第三国遣返行动。随后，最高法院解除了波士顿负责审理该质疑案的联邦法官下达的禁令，该禁令曾阻止政府在未给予外籍人员提出酷刑或迫害担忧的机会前将其遣返。
Trump administration urges Supreme Court to revive third-country deportation policy
2026-09-24T17:07:00-0400 / CBS News
By Camilo Montoya-Galvez
Camilo Montoya-Galvez Immigration Correspondent
Camilo Montoya-Galvez is the Immigration Correspondent at CBS News, where his reporting is featured across multiple programs and platforms, including national broadcast shows, CBS News 24/7, CBSNews.com and the organization’s social media accounts.
Read Full Bio
Updated on: September 24, 2026 / 5:12 PM EDT / CBS News
In an emergency request Thursday, the Trump administration urged the Supreme Court to revive its policy of deporting some migrants to places other than their country of origin, a practice that was struck down by a lower court on the grounds that it violates deportees’ due process rights.
The Justice Department asked the high court to pause a February 2026 order from a federal judge, largely upheld by an appellate court last week, that requires federal immigration officials to give deportees more due process. The courts said deportees need to get notice and a chance to challenge their deportation before any attempt to remove them to a so-called “third country” where they have no ties.
Such a pause would allow the Department of Homeland Security to continue a policy that empowers officials to send detainees to third nations, without providing them notice or a chance to challenge that deportation, if the receiving country has made blanket assurances that they will not persecute or torture the deportees.
Justice Department lawyers said DHS already had to cancel a flight to three third countries for 70 would-be deportees, some of whom have criminal records, in the wake of the adverse rulings from Boston-based judges.
In the emergency appeal, Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote that the third-country removal policy has allowed the Trump administration to remove “thousands” of individuals in recent months. He estimated that “thousands more” are eligible to be deported to third countries.
“These include some of the worst of the worst criminal aliens — whose home countries refuse to take them back,” he wrote. “The order below would again obstruct DHS from efficiently removing aliens — this time under a policy that has been in force for 15 months” because of earlier court orders.
Sauer also said that the lower court’s decision “undermines our standing abroad.”
“Finding third countries willing and able to accept aliens is a delicate diplomatic endeavor,” Sauer wrote. “By interjecting itself in that process, and potentially disrupting those carefully negotiated arrangements, the lower courts’ actions ‘will cause significant and irreparable harm to U.S. foreign policy.’”
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who handles emergency appeals from Massachusetts and other states in the region, gave lawyers for the immigrants challenging the policy until Monday afternoon to respond.
Sauer asked Jackson to provide the administration with temporary relief while it considers the emergency appeal.
As part of its far-reaching crackdown on illegal immigration, the Trump administration has brokered agreements with dozens of countries around the globe, mainly in Africa and Latin America, that have agreed to accept deportees from the U.S. who are not their citizens.
Some of the African nations that have agreed to such deportations include countries plagued by repressive governments, armed conflict, human rights abuses and widespread poverty, such as Equatorial Guinea, the Central African Republic and South Sudan.
While some countries, like Eswatini and South Sudan, have received deportees from the Trump administration who have violent and serious criminal histories, other nations, like Liberia, have accepted deported migrants from Latin America and other places across the world with no known criminal records, beyond immigration violations in the U.S.
In Liberia, CBS News interviewed men and women from Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras and Venezuela who were deported to the West African country last month and described feeling stateless. All of them said they were deported to West Africa without being notified in advance or given an opportunity to challenge the deportation.
Immigration officials have mainly targeted two categories of individuals in their third-country deportation campaign: immigrants who won limited legal protections in U.S. immigration courts barring ICE from deporting them to their homelands, and detainees whose home countries limit or reject U.S. deportations.
The dispute over the third-country removals has already been before the Supreme Court, though during an earlier stage in the case.
In a divided decision last year, the high court allowed the Trump administration to resume deportations to third countries while legal proceedings continued. Then, the Supreme Court lifted an order from the federal judge in Boston overseeing the challenge that had prevented the administration from removing immigrants without first giving them the chance to raise fears of torture or persecution.
发表回复