2026年9月24日 美国东部时间下午5:31 / CNN
作者：约翰·弗里茨
2小时前
发布于 2026年9月24日美国东部时间下午5:31
华盛顿特区美国最高法院，9月14日摄。
芬恩·戈麦斯/盖蒂图片社
唐纳德·特朗普总统政府周四敦促最高法院允许其在不给予移民提出人权关切机会的情况下，将移民遣送至其原籍国以外的国家。
波士顿美国第一巡回上诉法院周三晚作出裁决，实际上叫停了这项遣返行动，而司法部随后提起了紧急上诉。自一年多前最高法院在该问题上支持特朗普政府以来，此类遣返行动一直在进行。
美国司法部副部长、政府首席上诉律师D.约翰·绍尔在新提交的文件中告诉最高法院，这项裁决“给正在进行的遣返行动造成了严重的后勤问题——包括航班取消——并导致额外开支、潜在的外交纠纷，以及无法遣返危险罪犯”。
“尽管某些外国公民可能会因推迟遣返而受益，但国家不会，”绍尔写道。
最高法院去年在案件的早期阶段审查了这项政策，并在法院三名自由派大法官——索尼娅·索托马约尔、埃琳娜·卡根和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊的反对下，允许政策继续实施。
随后，最高法院在一起涉及一批被关押在吉布提军事基地数周的移民的案件中，再次支持了特朗普政府。
特朗普政府去年启动这项政策，作为其全面打击移民行动的一部分。历届美国政府面临的最大障碍之一，是试图将拒绝接收移民的本国送回，原因包括与美国关系冷淡等诸多因素。特朗普针对这一问题的解决方案是，将这些移民遣送至另一个国家，即便该移民与目的地国没有任何关联。
去年移民权益团体披露，一批原本计划送往南苏丹的移民被关押在吉布提，这项政策因此引发大量审查。这些移民包括来自古巴、越南和老挝的人员，被关押在改装后的集装箱货运船内。据估计，已有约2.5万名移民根据这项政策被遣返。
此次争议的核心是1994年经美国参议院批准的《禁止酷刑公约》，该公约通常禁止将移民遣返或引渡至有可能使其遭受酷刑的国家。该法律对于政府应如何作出此类判定、应给予涉案移民何种程序权利的规定较为模糊。
周四，司法部在紧急上诉中请求法院立即下达“行政”暂停令，以允许遣返航班继续运行。
司法部在提交给法院的文件中表示，他们已经取消了航班，并且“不得不将近150名外国公民从前往至少四个不同国家的遣返航班上撤离”。
最高法院命令反对该政策的移民权益团体于周一下午之前提交回应。
Trump urges Supreme Court to restart deportations to countries with poor human rights records
2026-09-24 5:31 PM ET / CNN
By John Fritze
2 hr ago
PUBLISHED Sep 24, 2026, 5:31 PM ET
The US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on September 14.
Finn Gomez/Getty Images
President Donald Trump’s administration urged the Supreme Court on Thursday to allow it to remove migrants to countries other than their homeland without giving them an opportunity to raise human rights concerns.
The Justice Department filed an emergency appeal after a decision from the Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals late Wednesday effectively blocked the removals, which have been taking place since the Supreme Court sided with the administration on the issue more than a year ago.
That decision has “created substantial logistical problems with ongoing removal operations – including the cancellation of flights – and led to added expense, potential diplomatic issues, and the inability to remove dangerous criminals,” US Solicitor General D. John Sauer, the administration’s top appellate attorney told the high court in the new filing.
“While certain aliens may benefit from stalling their removal, the nation does not,” Sauer wrote.
The Supreme Court reviewed the policy at an earlier stage of the case last year and allowed it to continue over the dissent of the court’s three liberal justices – Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
The justices then sided with the administration again in a case involving a specific group of migrants that had been held for several weeks on a military base in Djibouti.
The administration began the policy last year as part of its broader crackdown on immigration. One of the biggest hurdles previous administrations have faced is trying to deport migrants back to their home countries who would refuse to receive them for a host of reasons, including frosty relations with the United States. Trump’s answer to that problem was to deport those migrants to some other country, even if the migrant had no ties to the destination.
The policy drew considerable scrutiny last year after immigrant rights groups revealed that one group of migrants, initially bound for South Sudan, were being detained in Djibouti. The migrants, including some from Cuba, Vietnam and Laos, were held in a converted Conex shipping container. An estimated 25,000 migrants have been removed under the policy.
At issue is the Convention Against Torture, ratified by the Senate in 1994, that generally bars deportation or extradition to countries where there is a possibility that the migrant might be tortured. The law is vague about how an administration is supposed to make that determination and what process rights are due to the migrant at issue.
In its emergency appeal on Thursday, the administration asked for an immediate “administrative” stay that would allow the flights to continue.
The Justice Department told the court in its filing that it had cancelled flights and “has had to pull nearly 150 aliens from removal flights to at least four different countries.”
The high court ordered the immigrant rights groups fighting the administration to respond by Monday afternoon.
发表回复