美国最高法院将第三次审理密苏里州选区重划案


2026年9月23日 美国东部时间13:37 / 福克斯新闻频道

“人民而非政客”组织于周二晚间提起此次申请,此前美国第八巡回上诉法院裁定支持2025年版选区地图
作者:安德斯·哈格斯特伦,福克斯新闻

最高法院驳回共和党推动密苏里州重划选区的努力

福克斯新闻记者马克·梅雷迪思在“特别报道”栏目中解读了影响2026年中期选举竞选的关键事件,包括最高法院就密苏里州选区重划案作出裁决引发的政治余波、国会控制权之争,以及两党在11月大选前加紧造势之际推动选民关注的核心议题。

全新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/2afacb12-1d37-448e-8784-c3c07adc408c

收听本文
3分钟

美国最高法院将第三次就密苏里州选区重划案听取辩论,大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺于周二晚间再次同意介入此案。

2025年制定的极具争议的选区重划方案,如果在2026年大选前生效,将为共和党额外增加一个众议院席位。密苏里州一名联邦法官上月裁定支持2025年版地图,但两周前最高法院叫停了该裁决。

周一,位于圣路易斯的美国第八巡回上诉法院裁定支持新地图,反对该方案的组织于周二晚间紧急向最高法院提起上诉。

联邦上诉法院下令密苏里州使用曾被最高法院两次否决的国会选区地图

地图展示了密苏里州国会选区在2022年至2025年间的变化,包括堪萨斯城所在的第五选区向该州更多倾向共和党的农村地区扩张。(密苏里州行政办公室/阿曼达·马西亚斯/福克斯新闻数字频道)

卡瓦诺负责处理密苏里州的紧急申请,并指示新地图的支持者于美国东部时间周三下午2点前对上诉作出回应。

此次事态发展是这场法律拉锯战的最新进展,新地图在联邦法院、州法院、最高法院和密苏里州最高法院之间反复拉锯。

最高法院裁决后,这个红色州的选举混乱对共和党而言愈发离奇

此案缘起于密苏里州州务卿丹尼·霍斯金斯拒绝将2025年版地图提交2026年选民投票表决。取而代之的是,新地图被用于确定该州初选的国会选区。

2025年9月10日,民众聚集在杰斐逊城的密苏里州议会大厦,抗议该州国会选区地图的调整。(塔米·永布拉德/《堪萨斯城星报》/论坛新闻社 via 盖蒂图片社)

发起请愿的民主党组织“人民而非政客”向州法院提起诉讼,称根据密苏里州宪法,他们收集的30万个签名本应触发对新地图的全民公投。密苏里州最高法院支持了这一诉求,裁定2025年版地图“除非且直到2026年11月大选获得选民批准”,否则不得生效。

密苏里州最高法院在中期选举前否决共和党支持的国会选区地图;特朗普抨击这一“荒谬”裁决

霍斯金斯随后将此案上诉至最高法院,但卡瓦诺于9月4日拒绝受理其请求。

与此同时,凭借2025年版地图赢得初选的共和党候选人在联邦法院提起另一桩诉讼,辩称如果大选沿用2022年版地图,其所在选区将与初选时的地图大相径庭。他们指出,许多大选选民将面临在初选中未曾参与投票的候选人选项。

最高法院再次否决密苏里州使用特朗普支持的国会选区地图

密苏里州最高法院叫停新的选区重划方案,并下令11月就是否保留该方案举行全州投票。(美联社照片/大卫·A·利布)

第八巡回上诉法院法官斯蒂芬·R·克拉克裁定支持这些共和党候选人,并下令在今年的选举中使用2025年版地图,实质上与州最高法院的裁决相悖。

此次,“人民而非政客”组织请求美国最高法院介入,卡瓦诺同意受理。最高法院发布了一份未署名命令,暂停克拉克的裁决,直至第八巡回上诉法院就此案作出正式裁决。随后,第八巡回上诉法院加速审理此案,并裁定支持2025年版地图。

密苏里州最高法院在愈演愈烈的重划选区斗争中威胁要以藐视法庭罪处罚州务卿

“人民而非政客”组织于周二晚间提起最新的介入申请,称最高法院针对新地图的裁决仍然有效,并指出密苏里州选举官员的声明称,目前已来不及更改即将举行的选举所使用的地图。

2018年9月27日,最高法院大法官提名人布雷特·卡瓦诺在国会山的参议院确认听证会上发言。(迈克尔·雷诺兹-普尔/盖蒂图片社)

密苏里州县书记员与选举当局协会已宣布不会在11月的选举中使用2025年版地图,并在上诉文件中辩称,该州没有足够时间印制新选票。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

“选票已经印制完毕,密苏里州民众已经完成投票。还有数千人将在该命令试图生效前完成投票。官员们不应再在毫无意义的法律诉讼上浪费纳税人的钱,而应专注于组织我们的选举。”“人民而非政客”组织主任理查德·冯·格伦在一份声明中说道。

本文由美联社贡献报道。

安德斯·哈格斯特伦是福克斯新闻数字频道记者,报道全国政治及重大突发新闻事件。

Supreme Court to hear Missouri redistricting case for third time

September 23, 2026 1:37pm EDT / Fox News

People Not Politicians filed the request Tuesday night after the Eighth Circuit ruled in favor of the 2025 map

By Anders Hagstrom, Fox News

Supreme Court rejects Republican effort to redistrict Missouri

Fox News correspondent Mark Meredith has the latest on the key storylines shaping the race to the 2026 midterm elections, including the political fallout from the Supreme Court’s Missouri redistricting decision, the battle for control of Congress, and the issues driving voters as both parties intensify their push toward November on ‘Special Report.’

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/2afacb12-1d37-448e-8784-c3c07adc408c

Listen to this article

3 min

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in a Missouri redistricting case for a third time after Justice Brett Kavanaugh accepted a request to intervene in the case once again Tuesday night.

The divisive redistricting map drawn in 2025 would grant Republicans an additional seat in the House of Representatives if it is put in place ahead of the 2026 elections. A federal judge in Missouri ruled in favor of the 2025 map last month, but the Supreme Court put a stay on that ruling just two weeks ago.

Opponents of the map issued an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court late Tuesday night after the St. Louis-based Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the new map on Monday.

FEDERAL APPEALS COURT ORDERS MISSOURI TO USE CONGRESSIONAL MAP REJECTED TWICE BY SUPREME COURT

The maps show how Missouri’s congressional districts changed between 2022 and 2025, including the expansion of the Kansas City-area 5th District into more Republican-leaning rural parts of the state.(Missouri Office of Administration/Amanda Macias/Fox News Digital)

Kavanaugh handles emergency requests for the state of Missouri and directed supporters of the new map to respond to the appeal by Wednesday at 2 p.m. ET.

The development is the latest in a roller-coaster ride of legal decisions that have seen the new map fly up and down between federal and state courts, the Supreme Court and the Missouri Supreme Court.

ELECTION CHAOS IN THIS RED STATE JUST GOT EVEN STRANGER FOR REPUBLICANS AFTER SUPREME COURT RULING

The case began when Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins rejected a petition for the 2025 map to be placed on the ballot for a vote in 2026. Instead, the new map was used to determine congressional districts for the state’s primary elections.

People gather at the Missouri statehouse in Jefferson City on Sept. 10, 2025, to protest changes to the state’s congressional district maps.(Tammy Ljungblad/Kansas City Star/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

The Democratic group behind the petition, People Not Politicians, asked a state court to intervene, saying the group’s petition of 300,000 signatures should have triggered a referendum on the new map under Missouri’s constitution. The Missouri Supreme Court agreed, writing that the 2025 map cannot go into effect “unless and until approved by the voters at the November 2026 general election.”

MISSOURI HIGH COURT BLOCKS GOP-BACKED CONGRESSIONAL MAPS AHEAD OF MIDTERMS; TRUMP BLASTS ‘RIDICULOUS’ RULING

Hoskins then appealed the case to the Supreme Court, but Kavanaugh declined to hear his request on Sept. 4.

Meanwhile, Republican candidates who won primary elections based on the 2025 maps brought up a separate case in federal court, arguing that if the general election takes place under the 2022 map their districts would be very different from the primary maps. Many general election voters, they noted, would also be presented with options they had no role in voting for during the primaries.

SUPREME COURT AGAIN BLOCKS MISSOURI FROM USING TRUMP-BACKED CONGRESSIONAL MAPS

Missouri’s high court blocked the new redistricting map and ordered a statewide vote in November on whether to keep it.(AP Photo/David A. Lieb)

Eighth Circuit Judge Stephen R. Clark ruled in favor of those candidates and issued an order requiring that the 2025 maps be used in this year’s elections, effectively contradicting the state Supreme Court.

This time, People Not Politicians asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, and Kavanaugh agreed. The court issued an unsigned order blocking Clark’s order until the Eighth Circuit issued a formal ruling in the case. The Eighth Circuit then fast-tracked the case and ruled in favor of the 2025 map.

MISSOURI SUPREME COURT THREATENS SECRETARY OF STATE WITH CONTEMPT AMID INTENSIFYING REDISTRICTING BATTLE

People Not Politicians filed their latest request for an intervention on Tuesday night, arguing that the court’s ruling against the new map was still in effect, and pointing to statements from Missouri election officials saying it is too late to change what maps are used in the upcoming elections.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at his Senate confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill, Sept. 27, 2018.(Michael Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images)

The Missouri Association of County Clerks and Election Authorities already announced it will not be using the 2025 map for November, arguing in an appeal filing that the state does not have enough time to provide new ballots.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“Ballots have been printed, and Missourians have already voted. Thousands more will vote before this order seeks to take effect. Officials should stop wasting taxpayers’ money on pointless legal action and instead focus on administering our elections,” People Not Politicians director Richard von Glahn said in a statement.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Anders Hagstrom is a reporter with Fox News Digital covering national politics and major breaking news events.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2