2026-09-23T10:05:38.209Z / reuters.com
华盛顿9月23日路透电 —— 包括CNN、MS NOW和政治报（Politico）在内的多家新闻机构将于周三要求联邦法官立即恢复其进入白宫的权限，此前唐纳德·特朗普总统将它们列入禁令名单，这是他迄今为止与媒体最具戏剧性的冲突之一。
这些媒体机构表示，特朗普周五在其社交媒体平台Truth Social上宣布的这项禁令，是对美国宪法第一修正案赋予它们言论自由权利的非法攻击，同时也侵犯了它们的正当程序权利。
开启您的晨间资讯：每日案卷简报（The Daily Docket）将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱。点击此处订阅。
特朗普曾表示，这三家新闻机构“在报道美国总统时，不应该能够持续编造或报道虚构与谎言”。
在听证会前夕提交的法律文件中，特朗普政府辩称，进入白宫是一项特权而非权利，因此总统有权暂停这些机构的准入权限。
特朗普指责媒体试图在11月中期选举前打击共和党，而他日益下滑的民调支持率正威胁到共和党掌控国会两院的可能性。
“这项禁令对第一修正案的直接攻击再无出其右，也最公然地违反了我们最基本的宪法原则，”这些媒体机构在周一提交的诉讼中表示。
为表示声援，美国各大电视网络周一暂停了 pooled 联合采访报道特朗普行程的工作，颠覆了允许美国民众通过电视观看总统公开行程的延续数十年的制度。
2026年9月21日，在美国华盛顿，特朗普总统将CNN、MS NOW和政治报三家主要新闻机构列入白宫禁令后，MS NOW白宫记者沃恩·希拉德（Vaughn Hillyard）在白宫外街角进行报道。路透社/凯文·拉马克（Kevin Lamarque）
由于媒体联合采访团缺席，特朗普周一在白宫为新直升机坪举行的剪彩仪式直播中发表的讲话无法被听清。
华盛顿时间下午3点30分（格林尼治标准时间19:30），由特朗普任命的美国地区法官蒂莫西·凯利（Timothy Kelly）将在听证会上审议一项请求，即在诉讼程序进行期间立即恢复这些媒体机构进入白宫的权限。
言论自由专家表示，特朗普禁止这三家新闻机构进入白宫的行为在法律层面站不住脚。他们指出，美国法院长期以来认定，一旦政府向媒体开放相关场所，便不能以报道立场友好作为媒体获得准入的条件。
在2018年一起涉及类似法律争议的案件中，凯利曾下令白宫恢复CNN记者吉姆·阿科斯塔（Jim Acosta）的记者证，该证件此前在特朗普主持的一场激烈新闻发布会后被吊销。
凯利在该案中裁定，白宫在吊销阿科斯塔的采访资格时未采用公平透明的程序，称该过程“笼罩在神秘之中”。
周一下午，特朗普在社交媒体帖子中暗示对2017年其首届任期内任命凯利进入法官席位感到后悔，并表示他已做好败诉准备。
尽管历任总统都曾与媒体发生过冲突，但特朗普对媒体的打击史无前例。他颠覆了数十年的传统，拒绝多家主要新闻机构的基本采访权限，对记者的报道进行人身攻击，并推崇那些被认为对政府态度更友好的媒体。他还对包括《纽约时报》、《华尔街日报》和BBC在内的多家新闻机构提起诉讼。
简·沃尔夫（Jan Wolfe）与杰克·奎因（Jack Queen）报道；汤姆·哈尔斯（Tom Hals）、诺琳·瓦尔德（Noeleen Walder）与埃德蒙·克拉曼（Edmund Klamann）编辑
我们的报道准则：汤姆森路透社信任原则。
News outlets will ask judge to end Trump’s White House ban at hearing
2026-09-23T10:05:38.209Z / reuters.com
WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (Reuters) – News outlets CNN, MS NOW and Politico will ask a federal judge on Wednesday to immediately restore their access to the White House after President Donald Trump banned them in one of his most dramatic clashes with the media to date.
The outlets said the ban, which Trump announced on Friday on his social media platform Truth Social, is an illegal attack on their right to free speech under the US Constitution and violates their rights to due process.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
The three news organizations, he said, “shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they’re covering the President of the United States.”
In a legal filing on the eve of the hearing, the Trump administration argued that access to the White House was a privilege, not an entitlement, and so the president had the authority to suspend the organisations’ access.
Trump has accused the media of trying to hurt Republicans ahead of the November midterm elections, as his sagging popularity threatens the party’s chances of retaining control in both houses of Congress.
“This ban could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles,” the outlets said in their lawsuit, filed on Monday.
In a show of solidarity, major US television networks on Monday suspended their pooled coverage of Trump’s movements, upending a decades-long system that allows Americans to see their president’s public movements on TV.
MS NOW White House correspondent Vaughn Hillyard reports from a street corner just outside the White House after US President Donald Trump banned three major news outlets (CNN, MS NOW and Politico) from the White House, in Washington, D.C., US, September 21, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
With the press pool absent, Trump’s remarks on Monday were inaudible during the White House’s live stream of a ribbon-cutting ceremony for its new helipad.
At a 3:30 p.m. (1930 GMT) hearing in Washington, US District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee, will consider a request to immediately reinstate the outlets’ access to the White House while the litigation unfolds.
Trump’s effort to ban the three news organizations from the White House is on shaky legal ground, according to free speech experts, who said US courts have long held that the government cannot condition press access on favorable coverage once it has opened a space to the media.
In a 2018 case that raised similar legal issues, Kelly ordered the White House to restore CNN correspondent Jim Acosta’s press pass, which had been revoked after a contentious news conference with Trump.
Kelly ruled in that case that the White House had not used fair and clear procedures to revoke Acosta’s credential, calling the process “shrouded in mystery.”
In a social media post on Monday afternoon, Trump indicated regret over appointing Kelly to the bench in 2017, during his first term, and said he was bracing for a loss.
Although past presidents have battled with the press, Trump’s campaign against the media has been unprecedented. He has upended decades of tradition by denying basic access to many major news organizations, launching personal attacks on journalists for their reporting, and elevating media outlets seen as more sympathetic to the administration. He also has filed lawsuits against multiple news outlets, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the BBC.
Reporting by Jan Wolfe and Jack Queen; Editing by Tom Hals, Noeleen Walder and Edmund Klamann
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复