2026年9月14日 21:27 UTC / 路透社
内特·雷蒙德 撰稿

2025年5月29日,英国伦敦美国大使馆外展示着护照和签证预约信息标识。路透社/汉娜·麦基/档案照片 购买授权,打开新标签页
- 概要
- 新规将外国学生签证有效期上限设为四年
- 法官称国土安全部采纳该政策的依据“极其薄弱”
- 法官表示若新规生效,美国大学将面临招生人数下滑
波士顿9月14日路透电 – 一名联邦法官周一叫停了唐纳德·特朗普政府的一项新规,该规则原本将限制外国学生和记者无需申请延期即可留在美国的时长。
美国波士顿地区联邦法官F.丹尼斯·赛勒做出了有利于工会和高等教育倡导团体联盟的裁决,比美国国土安全部原定的新规生效日期早一天。
《错误信息监控》简报汇总国际错误信息叙事,每期都包含“真实还是虚假?”测验。点击此处订阅。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
赛勒表示,国土安全部出台这项政策的依据“极其薄弱”。该机构曾以国家安全和防范签证项目欺诈为由为政策辩护,但法官认为,国土安全部未履行法律义务,未能回应政策变更引发的担忧,也未考虑限制更小的替代方案。
国土安全部未立即回应置评请求。
这位由共和党总统乔治·W·布什任命的法官在裁决中写道,该规则颠覆了近50年来美国向外国学生发放“停留期内有效”签证的制度。
他表示,这一制度已吸引数千万外国学生和研究人员赴美,促成了“科学、医学和技术领域的突破性研究,可观的经济增长,以及其他诸多大规模惠及各方的益处”。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
赛勒称,国土安全部7月通过的新规试图用一套大幅限制外国学生、教授和记者总人数的制度取而代之。
根据该新规,针对外国学生的F类签证和允许文化交流项目参与者赴美工作的J类签证有效期上限将设为四年,而目前有效期可达数年的记者I类签证最长仅为240天。
目前约有160万人持有F类签证,另有50万人持有J类签证。法官指出,麻省理工学院和哈佛大学等顶尖研究型大学的外国学生占比颇高,尤其是研究生阶段。
赛勒表示,若新规生效,这类大学可能损失数亿美元的收入,招生人数也将下滑。
“这对高等教育体系和美国经济造成的损害可能是灾难性的,”赛勒写道。
原告之一、高等教育与移民总统联盟负责人米里亚姆·费尔德布卢姆表示,法官的裁决认可了新规若生效将对外国学生、大学和经济造成的伤害。
“在案件审理期间,这项临时救济保住了长期以来的制度,该制度使我们的高校——以及我们国家——能够吸引、培养并留住全球人才,”费尔德布卢姆说道。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
内特·雷蒙德 波士顿报道;大卫·格雷戈里奥和罗萨尔巴·奥布莱恩 编辑
我们的报道准则:路透社诚信报道准则,打开新标签页
US judge blocks Trump limits on how long foreign students, journalists can stay
September 14, 2026 9:27 PM UTC / Reuters
By Nate Raymond
An information sign for passport and visa appointments is displayed outside the U.S. embassy in London, Britain, May 29, 2025. REUTERS/Hannah McKay/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
- Summary
- Rule would cap duration of visas for international students at four years
- Judge says DHS adopted policy on ‘exceptionally weak’ rationales
- Judge says universities would face enrollment declines if rule took effect
BOSTON, Sept 14 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Monday blocked U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing a new rule that would limit how long foreign students and journalists can remain in the U.S. without applying for extensions.
U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor in Boston ruled, opens new tab in favor of a coalition of unions and higher education advocacy groups a day before the Department of Homeland Security’s rule was set to take effect.
The Misinformation Monitor newsletter rounds up international misinformation narratives, with a “Real or Fake?” quiz in every edition. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Saylor said DHS adopted the policy based on “exceptionally weak” rationales. The agency had cited national security and the need to prevent fraud in the visa program, but the judge found it had not adhered to its legal obligations to engage with concerns about a policy change or consider less burdensome alternatives.
DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The judge, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, wrote that, opens new tab the rule upended a system through which the U.S. for nearly five decades had issued visas to foreign students for their “duration of status.”
That system, he said, has permitted tens of millions of foreign students and researchers to come to the U.S., leading to “groundbreaking research in science, medicine, and technology, substantial economic growth, and a host of other benefits, often on a vast scale.”
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Saylor said the rule DHS adopted in July seeks to replace that system with one that would substantially restrict the overall number of foreign students, professors and journalists in the country.
Under the rule, F visas for international students and J visas that allow visitors on cultural exchange programs to work in the U.S. would be capped at four years, while I visas for journalists, which currently can last years, would be up to 240 days.
About 1.6 million people currently have F visas and another 500,000 have J visas. Major research universities like Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard have large percentages of foreign students, particularly at the graduate level, the judge noted.
If the rule took effect, such universities would likely suffer hundreds of millions of dollars in costs and enrollment would decline, Saylor said.
“The damage to the higher education system and to the economy of the United States is likely to be catastrophic,” Saylor wrote.
Miriam Feldblum, the head of one of the plaintiffs, Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, said the judge’s ruling recognized the harm the rule would cause to international students, universities and the economy if it was allowed to take effect.
“While the case continues, this relief preserves the longstanding system that enables our colleges and universities — and our country — to attract, educate, and retain global talent,” Feldblum said.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by David Gregorio and Rosalba O’Brien
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
发表回复