2026-09-04T10:02:47.406Z / 路透社
Supporters gather outside the federal courthouse after a hearing in a lawsuit brought by a coalition of Democratic state attorneys general seeking to block U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order tightening rules on mail-in voting, in Boston, Massachusetts, U.S., June 2, 2026. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
9月4日(路透社)——唐纳德·特朗普总统领导的政府周四请求美国最高法院允许其执行一项新的美国邮政服务规则,收紧邮寄选票的使用规定,这让各州陷入不确定状态,不清楚是否需要在11月3日的中期选举中实施该规则。
随着美国各州邮寄选票的截止日期临近,这种不确定性变得愈发紧迫。特朗普所在的共和党目前在国会两院都仅保有微弱多数优势。北卡罗来纳州预计将于本周五寄出选票,成为首个启动邮寄选票的州。
通过《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。在此注册。
以下将详细解释这项新规则的内容、相关诉讼的进展以及未来可能出现的情况。
这项新规则有何内容?
特朗普于3月签署一项行政命令,要求各州向美国邮政服务局提供邮寄选票收件人名单,并在所有寄出和寄回的选票信封上添加唯一条形码。
该命令要求美国邮政局仅向每个州批准的邮寄选票名单上的选民递送选票。
长期以来,特朗普一直对邮寄选票的安全性表示质疑,并虚假声称自己在2020年总统选举中失利是因为普遍存在的选举欺诈行为。
而特朗普本人则经常通过邮寄方式投票。
民主党官员表示,他们的支持者将受到这些限制措施的不成比例影响,因为民主党选民比共和党选民更倾向于邮寄投票,并称这些措施可能会剥夺符合资格选民的投票权。
根据麻省理工学院选举数据与科学实验室的数据,2024年大选时有37%的民主党选民通过邮寄方式投票,而共和党选民的这一比例为24%。
法院方面发生了什么?
这项行政命令遭到了民主党官员、由民主党掌控的州以及投票权组织的法律挑战。这些诉讼称,美国邮政局无权拒绝邮寄选票,且特朗普的行政命令侵犯了美国宪法赋予各州管理选举的权力。
总部位于波士顿的美国地区法官因迪拉·塔尔瓦尼于6月25日在提起诉讼的民主党领导州中阻止了该行政命令的执行,并于8月11日扩大了禁令范围,阻止美国邮政局在全国范围内实施其新规则。
上个月,美国最高法院撤销了塔尔瓦尼6月的裁决,理由是各州在美国邮政局公布详细说明如何执行该行政命令的最终规则之前就提起了诉讼。保守派大法官以6票对3票占据多数的最高法院为各州再次提起诉讼敞开了大门。
随后各州和相关组织重新提起诉讼,辩称美国邮政局于8月22日公布最终规则意味着该案已成熟,可以进行审理。塔尔瓦尼再次阻止美国邮政局实施该规则。
周四,特朗普政府请求最高法院推翻塔尔瓦尼的最新裁决。此举不同寻常,因为美国第一巡回上诉法院尚未就司法部对塔尔瓦尼裁决的上诉作出裁定。
民主党还在华盛顿特区的联邦法院对该规则提起了单独诉讼。
各州选举官员将采取何种行动?
许多州的选举官员明确表示,目前他们无法及时全面调整系统,以在中期选举前遵守美国邮政局的这项规则。
各州用于上传名单的在线门户网站尚未启用,而且众多州的选举办公室已经完成了信封和选票的印刷。
北卡罗来纳州选举委员会执行主任萨姆·海斯周四对记者表示,该县选举官员将按计划于本周五寄出选票。海斯称,美国邮政局已经批准了该州选票信封的设计。
“我们正密切关注法院的动向。如果情况有任何变化,我们将遵守相关规定,”海斯说道。
特朗普政府作何回应?
司法部在法庭文件中表示,美国邮政局有权实施这项规则,并称关于谁有资格投票的决定权仍将由各州掌握。
司法部还驳斥了各州关于新规则会在选举临近时引发混乱和恐慌的担忧,指出美国邮政局将帮助各州选举官员遵守该规则。
根据康涅狄格州民主党参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔本周公开的一份举报人投诉,美国邮政局已在推进该在线门户网站的建设。举报人称,该系统存在设计缺陷,可能导致美国邮政局错误地拒绝向符合资格的选民邮寄选票。
在周四提交的一份法庭文件中,一名美国邮政局官员表示,该局仍在对该门户网站进行优化,并表示该网站可能将于下周对那些希望自愿使用的州开放。
路透社纽约市的卢克·科恩报道 波士顿的内特·雷蒙德和华盛顿的戴维·谢泼德森补充报道 诺琳·瓦尔德和霍华德·戈勒编辑
Will Trump’s restrictions on mail-in ballots be in place for the midterms?
2026-09-04T10:02:47.406Z / Reuters
Supporters gather outside the federal courthouse after a hearing in a lawsuit brought by a coalition of Democratic state attorneys general seeking to block U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order tightening rules on mail-in voting, in Boston, Massachusetts, U.S., June 2, 2026. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Sept 4 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to enforce a new U.S. Postal Service rule tightening the use of mail-in ballots, leaving states in limbo as to whether they will be required to implement it for the November 3 midterm elections.
The uncertainty has taken on new urgency as deadlines approach for U.S. states to send out mail ballots ahead of the midterms, with Trump’s Republicans defending narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress. North Carolina was expected to send out its ballots on Friday, the first state to do so.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Below is an explanation of what the rule does, where the court cases stand and what could come next.
WHAT DOES THE NEW RULE DO?
Trump signed an executive order in March requiring states to supply the U.S. Postal Service with lists of mail ballot recipients, and to place unique barcodes on all outbound and return ballot envelopes.
The order requires USPS to deliver ballots only to voters on each state’s approved mail-in ballot list.
Trump has long cast doubt on the security of mail-in ballots and has asserted, falsely, that his loss in the 2020 presidential election was due to widespread fraud.
Trump himself has regularly voted by mail.
Democratic Party officials say their supporters would be disproportionately affected by the restrictions because Democrats are more likely to vote by mail than Republicans, and say the measures risked disenfranchising eligible voters.
Thirty-seven percent of Democrats voted by mail in the 2024 election, compared to 24% of Republicans, according to the MIT Election Data + Science Lab.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THE COURTS?
The executive order drew legal challenges from Democratic Party officials, Democratic-led states and voting rights groups. The lawsuits said the USPS had no authority to reject mail ballots and that Trump’s executive order trampled on the individual states’ authority, granted by the U.S. Constitution, to administer elections.
Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani on June 25 blocked implementation of the executive order in the Democratic-led states that had sued, and on August 11 effectively expanded that order by preventing USPS from implementing its new rule nationwide.
The U.S. Supreme Court last month voided Talwani’s June order because the states had brought their challenge before the USPS released its finalized rule detailing how it would implement the executive order. The top court, where conservative justices hold a 6-3 majority, left the door open for the states to sue again.
The states and the groups then renewed their challenges, arguing that the issuing of a finalized USPS rule on August 22 meant the case was ripe for adjudication. Talwani again blocked the USPS from implementing the rule.
On Thursday, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to overturn Talwani’s latest order. The move was unusual, as the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had yet to rule on the Justice Department’s challenge to Talwani’s decision.
The Democratic Party has separately challenged the rule in Washington, D.C., federal court.
WHAT WILL STATES’ ELECTION OFFICIALS DO?
Many state election officials have been vocal in saying at this point they would be unable to overhaul their systems in time to comply with the USPS rule before the midterms.
An online portal that states would use to upload their lists is not yet active, and numerous state election offices already have their envelopes and ballots printed.
Sam Hayes, executive director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, told reporters on Thursday that county election officials would mail out ballots on Friday as expected. Hayes said the USPS had already approved the design of the state’s ballot envelopes.
“We’re watching to see what the courts do. If anything changes, we will be in compliance,” Hayes said.
HOW IS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION RESPONDING?
The Justice Department has said in court filings that the USPS has the authority to implement the rule, and said the decisions about who is eligible to vote would still be up to the states.
It has also dismissed states’ concerns that the new rule would cause confusion and chaos close to the election, noting that USPS would help state election officials comply with the rule.
The USPS has meanwhile moved forward with building the online portal, according to a whistleblower complaint made public by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, this week. The whistleblower said design flaws in the system could result in the USPS wrongly refusing to mail out ballots to eligible voters.
In a court filing on Thursday, a USPS official said the service was continuing to refine the portal, and said that it may be available for states that wish to use it voluntarily next week.
Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York Additional reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston and David Shepardson in Washington; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Howard Goller
发表回复