密苏里州最高法院叫停偏袒共和党的新众议院选区地图,需交由选民表决


2026年9月3日 下午6:39 美国东部时间 / 美联社

密苏里州最高法院一致裁定,叫停该州在今年中期选举中使用偏袒共和党的新众议院选区地图,下令就是否认可该新地图举行全州范围投票。

周四的这项裁决在全国选区重划之争中,给共和党带来罕见挫折——后者正努力维持其微弱的众议院多数席位优势。这同时也是长期担任民主党众议员的伊曼纽尔·克利弗的重大胜利,他位于堪萨斯城的选区原本将被重划,变得更有利于共和党。

该裁决仍有可能被上诉至美国最高法院。

密苏里州的新选区方案已在8月的初选中使用,但州最高法院表示,该方案不得在11月的大选中使用,且永久不得使用——除非选民首先认可由共和党主导的州议会通过的新选区方案。

法院之所以暂停新选区方案的实施,是因为民众提交了请愿签名,要求发起全民公投。

法院在裁决中表示:“请愿公投合法、有效且符合时限要求,州务卿对此作出了错误结论。”包含新选区方案的立法“尚未生效,且在获得选民批准之前,也不会生效”。

因此,2020年人口普查后采用的国会选区地图——包含6个倾向共和党的选区和2个倾向民主党的选区——“将在2026年11月的大选中继续完全有效”。

密苏里州宪法并未明确规定,州议会通过的国会选区重划法案可发起全民公投。但州最高法院裁定,允许对州议会“任何法案”发起公投的宪法条款,涵盖了国会选区重划法案。

这项裁决为长达一年的围绕新选区方案的政治博弈和法律纠纷画上了句号。

在特朗普总统敦促共和党重划国会选区以谋取选举优势后,密苏里州州长迈克·基奥去年召集议员召开特别会议,大幅调整由克利弗担任议员的第5国会选区。

反对者在去年12月提交了超过30万个请愿签名,要求将该选区重划方案交由全民投票。但共和党籍州务卿丹尼·霍斯金斯一直等到8月初选当日才驳回该请愿。他声称,公投程序不适用于国会选区重划。下级法院支持了这一裁定,随后案件上诉至州最高法院,后者推翻了霍斯金斯的决定。

代表霍斯金斯和共和党委员会的律师曾辩称,距离大选已过于接近,恢复使用原有选区方案会引发混乱和失序。

克利弗在8月初选中并无对手,过去两次选举中,他在这个以堪萨斯城为核心的选区都获得了至少60%的选票。

共和党州参议员里克·布拉廷在重划后的第5国会选区初选中胜出,该选区被向东延伸超过100英里,纳入了共和党倾向的乡村地区。据美联社估算,重划后的第5选区约59%的选民是新增的。

克利弗并未在许多新增的乡村地区张贴竞选标语,他解释称是在等待密苏里州最高法院的裁决。但他曾誓言,无论裁决结果如何,都会继续竞选连任。

“无论我们身处何方,我们都会参选,而且会全力以赴,”克利弗上个月在塞达利亚的密苏里州博览会上表示,该地区已被纳入修订后的第5选区。

布拉廷是一名海军陆战队老兵,也是州议会保守派组织“密苏里自由核心小组”的创始成员,他曾质疑克利弗能否代表范围更广的选区。

“我认为他的整个竞选策略就是寄希望于法院能按他的意愿行事。我认为他并不代表密苏里州的价值观,”布拉廷在州博览会上曾如此说道。

国会选区通常每十年根据最新人口普查数据重新划定一次。但特朗普为在中期选举中获取优势而推动的行动,引发了一场不同寻常的十年中期选区重划之争,波及十多个州——仅密苏里州就引发了12起诉讼。总体而言,共和党曾希望在全国范围内额外拿下多达10个席位。

密苏里州最高法院的这项裁决是全国范围内少数几项不利于共和党选区重划计划的裁决之一。

在此次最新裁决之前,密苏里州最高法院已经驳回了三项主张:特别会议非法、十年中期重划选区不被允许,以及新选区方案不够紧凑。

“人民而非政客”组织牵头发起了此次公投请愿。

周三,数百人在州最高法院外集会,高呼“让我们投票!”来自杰斐逊城的格兰特·克里斯坦森表示,他已签名支持将该选区方案交由全民投票。

“拉选区划分和选民压制没什么两样,”克里斯坦森说,“为了让选区倾向某一方而拆分选区,这并不公平。”

Missouri’s top court blocks new House map favoring Republicans until voters can weigh in

September 3, 2026 6:39 PM EDT / AP

The Missouri Supreme Court has unanimously blocked the state from moving forward with a new House map that favors Republicans in this year’s midterm elections, ordering a statewide vote on whether to uphold or reject the new map.

The decision Thursday marks a rare setback for Republicans in the national redistricting battle, as they fight to hold onto their slim House majority. It’s also a massive win for longtime Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, whose Kansas City-area district was set to be redrawn to tilt it toward the GOP.

The ruling still could be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Missouri’s new districts were used in the August primaries. But the state Supreme Court said they cannot be used in the November general election — or ever again, unless voters first uphold the new districts passed by the Republican-led legislature.

The court placed the new districts on hold because citizens submitted petition signatures seeking a referendum.

“The referendum petition was legal, sufficient, and timely, and the secretary incorrectly concluded otherwise,” the court said in its ruling. The legislation containing the new districts “did not go into effect and will not go into effect unless and until approved by the voters.”

As a result, the congressional map adopted after the 2020 census — with six GOP-leaning and two Democratic-leaning districts —****”remains in full force and effect for the November 2026 general election.”

The Missouri Constitution does not specifically say a referendum petition can be used for a congressional redistricting law passed by the Legislature. But the state Supreme Court ruled that a constitutional provision allowing a referendum on “any act” of the legislature encompasses congressional redistricting.

The ruling capped a year of political maneuvering and legal wrangling over the new districts.

After President Trump urged Republicans to redraw congressional districts to their advantage, Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe called lawmakers into a special session last year to dramatically reconfigure the 5th Congressional District, held by Cleaver.

Opponents submitted over 300,000 petition signatures in December seeking to put the map to a vote of the people. But Republican Secretary of State Denny Hoskins waited until primary election day in August to reject the petition. He asserted that the referendum process cannot be used for congressional redistricting. A lower court agreed, resulting in an appeal to the state’s highest court, which overturned Hoskins’ decision.

Attorneys representing Hoskins and Republican Party committees had argued it was too close to the general election to revert to the prior districts without causing confusion and chaos.

Cleaver, who was unopposed in the August primary, has carried the Kansas City-based district with at least 60% of the vote in each of the past two elections.

Republican state Sen. Rick Brattin won an August primary in the reshaped 5th Congressional District, which had been stretched more than 100 miles eastward to include rural Republican areas. About 59% of the 5th District’s voters were new under the revised map, according to an Associated Press estimate.

Cleaver had not posted campaign signs in many of the new rural areas, explaining that he was waiting for the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision. But he had vowed to continue his reelection campaign regardless of the outcome.

“We’re going to run, and we’re going to run hard, no matter where we are,” Cleaver said last month at the Missouri State Fairgrounds in Sedalia, which had been added to the revised 5th District.

Brattin, a Marine veteran and founding member of the conservative Missouri Freedom Caucus in the state Legislature, had questioned whether Cleaver could represent a wider district.

“I think his whole campaign strategy was hoping that the courts would do his bidding for him. I don’t think that he represents Missouri values,” Brattin had said at the State Fair.

Congressional districts typically are redrawn at the start of each decade, based on new census data. But Mr. Trump’s quest for a midterm election advantage triggered an unusual mid-decade redistricting battle that spread to more than a dozen states — and triggered a dozen lawsuits in Missouri alone. All told, Republicans had hoped to net as many as 10 additional seats nationally.

The Missouri Supreme Court ruling was one of only a few nationally to go against Republicans’ redistricting plans.

Prior to its latest ruling, Missouri’s top court already had rejected claims that the special session was illegal, mid-decade redistricting isn’t allowed and the new districts aren’t compact enough.

The group People Not Politicians spearheaded the referendum petition.

A couple hundred people chanted “Let us vote!” while rallying Wednesday outside the state Supreme Court. Grant Christensen, of Jefferson City, said he had signed the referendum petition to put the map to a vote.

“Gerrymandering is the same as voter suppression,” Christensen said. “Cutting up districts in order to steer them to vote one way or the other is not fair.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2