2026年8月31日 下午4:38 UTC / 路透社
作者:约翰·克鲁泽尔
2026年8月31日 下午4:38 UTC 更新于3小时前
- 摘要
- 下级法院裁定委员会无权享受低价广告费率
- 最高法院6月驳回联合支出上限规定
- 共和党主要委员会的资金储备远超民主党
华盛顿8月31日路透电 — 在唐纳德·特朗普所在政党力争在11月中期选举中掌控国会之际,两个共和党委员会已向美国最高法院请求保留一项联邦政策,该政策可让它们获得长期以来政治候选人享有的广播电视广告折扣费率。
美国全国共和党参议员竞选委员会和美国全国共和党国会竞选委员会在周一公开的一份文件中请求大法官们叫停下级法院的裁决,该裁决实际上阻止了它们享受联邦通信委员会(FCC)所谓的“最低单位收费”规则带来的优惠。
即刻开启您的晨间资讯:每日法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,订阅《每日案卷》通讯。点击此处注册。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
该政策要求广播公司在大选前60天内播出特定政治广告时收取折扣费率,今年的这一窗口将于本周五开启。联邦通信委员会于3月发布指南称,政党委员会在购买与候选人联合投放的广告时,有资格享受低价费率。
最高法院6月裁决支持共和党挑战者,废除了政党与候选人之间的联合支出联邦限制,此后该FCC政策的重要性显著提升。一名共和党官员向路透社表示,该裁决与委员会获得低价广告时段的资格相结合,意味着“我们的资金能比以往发挥更大作用”。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
共和党希望在11月3日的中期选举中保住对众议院和参议院的控制权。
根据联邦选举委员会8月提交的文件,三大共和党委员会——共和党全国委员会、全国共和党国会竞选委员会和全国共和党参议员竞选委员会——截至7月底的现金储备约为2.79亿美元,是民主党同行约1.36亿美元资金的两倍多,民主党委员会还背负着近1800万美元的债务。
包括佐治亚州参议员乔恩·奥索夫在内的一群民主党候选人于6月提起诉讼,试图阻止最低单位收费政策适用于政党委员会。
位于里士满的美国第四巡回上诉法院于8月25日支持民主党挑战者,裁定政党无权享受低价广告费率。该裁决促使共和党委员会向最高法院提出请求,要求在FCC广告费率政策于本周生效前叫停第四巡回上诉法院的裁决。
在法庭文件中,共和党委员会表示,它们已经“根据这些规则编制了数千万美元的广告采购预算”。它们补充道:“但由于第四巡回上诉法院的裁决,广播电台已经取消了这些费率。”
最高法院6月以6票赞成、3票反对的裁决,凭借其保守派多数席位,认定限制政党在候选人参与下用于竞选活动的支出金额违反了美国宪法第一修正案对政府剥夺言论自由的保护。
这是近几十年来取消竞选资金限制的最新一项裁决,也是最高法院在近期结束的任期内作出的多项有利于共和党人的裁决之一。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
约翰·克鲁泽尔 报道;威尔·邓汉姆 编辑
我们的标准:路透社信任原则,打开新标签页
Republican committees ask US Supreme Court to preserve access to cheaper ad rates
2026-08-31 4:38 PM UTC / Reuters
By John Kruzel
August 31, 2026 4:38 PM UTC Updated 3 hours ago
People walk in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 30, 2026. REUTERS/Cheney Orr Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
- Summary
- Lower court said committees not entitled to lower ad rates
- Supreme Court in June rejected coordinated-spending caps
- Major Republican committees’ war chest dwarfs Democrats
WASHINGTON, Aug 31 (Reuters) – Two Republican committees have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve a federal policy that would give them access to discounted television and radio advertising rates long available to political candidates, as President Donald Trump’s party seeks to keep control of Congress in the November midterm elections.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee and National Republican Congressional Committee asked the justices in a filing made public on Monday to halt a lower court’s ruling that effectively blocked them from benefiting from the Federal Communications Commission’s so-called “lowest unit charge” rule.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
That policy requires broadcasters to charge discounted rates for airing certain political advertisements within 60 days of a general election, a window that opens this year on Friday. The FCC in March published guidance saying that party committees are eligible for the cheaper rates when buying ads coordinated with candidates.
The FCC policy gained greater significance after the Supreme Court in June struck down federal restrictions on spending coordinated between parties and their candidates, siding with Republican challengers. One Republican official told Reuters that the combination of that ruling and the committees’ eligibility for cheaper airtime means, “Our dollars can go further than they could before.”
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Republicans are hoping to retain control of the House of Representatives and Senate in the November 3 midterms.
The three major Republican committees — the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee — ended July with about $279 million in cash. That was more than double the roughly $136 million held by their Democratic counterparts, which also carried nearly $18 million in debt, according to Federal Election Commission filings in August.
A group of Democratic candidates including Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia sued in June to try to block the lowest unit charge policy from applying to party committees.
The Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on August 25 sided with the Democratic challengers, ruling that political parties are not entitled to the low-cost ad rate. That ruling prompted the Republican committees to ask the Supreme Court to halt the 4th Circuit’s ruling before the FCC ad-rate policy takes effect this week.
In court papers, the Republican committees said they have already budgeted “tens of millions of dollars in ad buys under these rules.” They added, “But because of the 4th Circuit’s decision, broadcast stations are already rescinding those rates.”
The Supreme Court in a 6-3 ruling in June powered by its conservative majority decided that a cap on the amount of money parties can spend on campaigns with input from candidates violates the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment protections against government abridgment of freedom of speech.
It was the latest decision eliminating campaign funding limits in recent decades and marked one of several rulings the court issued during its recently concluded term that favored Republicans.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
发表回复