2026年8月27日 / 美国东部时间上午11:40 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿讯 —— 美联储理事丽莎·库克就特朗普政府指控她在抵押贷款文件上存在虚假陈述一事为自己辩护,在一封新信件中她表示自己“从未犯过抵押贷款欺诈罪”。
在周三写给白宫的信中,库克的律师阿贝·洛厄尔表示,试图以联邦住房金融局局长比尔·普尔特的指控为由解雇库克,将“无视事实和法律”。洛厄尔告诉白宫法律顾问戴维·沃林顿,针对库克的指控“毫无根据且不属实”。
他写道:“库克理事从未犯过抵押贷款欺诈或任何故意不当行为,不存在合法的理由将她从美联储理事会撤职。”
去年,普尔特声称库克伪造了两处房产的抵押贷款文件,特朗普首次试图将库克从美联储理事会职位上撤下。这两处房产分别位于密歇根州安阿伯和佐治亚州亚特兰大,均是库克在拜登政府时期获得美联储理事职位之前购买的。
库克提起诉讼,质疑解雇决定违反联邦法律——联邦法律规定总统只能“因正当理由”罢免美联储理事。今年6月,最高法院允许库克在下级法院审理其案件期间继续履职。最高法院以5比4的裁决表示,库克有权在被解雇前收到通知并就指控作出回应,而她并未获得这一权利。
最高法院作出裁决数周后,特朗普再次试图将库克赶下台。白宫在8月5日的一封信中告知库克,总统正考虑以抵押贷款欺诈指控为由解雇她,并列出了针对她的指控。信中设定8月26日为库克对普尔特提出的指控作出回应的最后期限。
白宫副幕僚长丹·斯卡维诺在信中称,库克签署了一份抵押贷款协议,将亚特兰大的公寓列为她的“主要”住所,尽管她同时签署了另一份抵押贷款文件,将安阿伯的住房列为同一类别。白宫还指控,库克在签署抵押贷款约14个月后将亚特兰大的房产挂牌出租,但她在2022年和2023年的财务披露中从未披露过租金收入。
“金融事务方面的基本可信度和谨慎程度,与美联储理事会成员的职责有着明确的关联,”斯卡维诺写道,“由于刑事转递中的指控反映了你在诚实、可信度和履行现任职务能力方面的问题,总统认定有理由相信这些指控构成将你从美联储理事会职位上撤职的正当理由。”
库克的回应
但洛厄尔表示,库克签署由放贷机构提供的“主要”抵押贷款协议是“完全无心的疏忽”。他说,库克还“一贯”在提交的材料中表明自己的“主要”住所位于密歇根州,并向放贷机构确认亚特兰大的房产是“第二套住房”。洛厄尔辩称,将亚特兰大的抵押贷款归类为“主要”还是“次要”是放贷机构的自由裁量权。
“库克理事在放贷机构提供的表格上犯的明显错误是无意的,而非刑事犯罪,且发生在她就职前的私人身份期间,”洛厄尔写道。
他还指出,无论是白宫的信件还是普尔特的指控,都没有声称库克在任何房产上获得了优惠利率。
针对白宫指控库克未披露亚特兰大房产的租金收入,洛厄尔告诉沃林顿,尽管库克曾短暂将该公寓挂牌出租,但最终并未出租。
洛厄尔进而指责特朗普及其内阁成员,包括财政部长斯科特·贝森特和司法部长托德·布兰奇,在他们自己的抵押贷款申报中将两处房产列为“主要”住所。
“总统显然明白,犯这样的错误并不会让一个人——无论是他自己还是他的五名内阁成员——不适合担任公职,”他写道,“试图基于这些针对库克理事就职前行为的指控将其撤职,会‘侵蚀国会旨在维护的独立性’……也远远达不到最高法院设定的标准。而选择性地这么做,会引发令人不安的疑问:特朗普总统为何专门针对库克理事。”
洛厄尔和库克的另一名律师诺姆·艾森在一份单独的声明中表示,他们准备再次诉诸法院,以挑战“任何非法解雇库克的企图”。
总统的批评者指责他试图罢免库克,以加强对美联储的控制,并警告他的行动威胁到美联储的独立性。特朗普还多次抨击前主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔未能足够快地降低利率。
华盛顿特区的联邦检察官今年早些时候向美联储发出传票,作为对鲍威尔的刑事调查的一部分,该调查与美联储多年来对其华盛顿特区总部的翻新项目有关。但在该调查成为确认鲍威尔继任者凯文·沃什的障碍后,检察官终止了这项刑事调查。
特朗普选定的沃什于今年5月接任美联储理事会新主席一职。
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-reacts-to-supreme-courts-split-rulings-on-presidential-firings/
特朗普就最高法院关于总统解雇权的分歧裁决作出回应
(时长03:27)
Fed’s Lisa Cook pushes back on Trump firing threat, says she “never committed mortgage fraud”
August 27, 2026 / 11:40 AM EDT / CBS News
Washington — Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook defended herself against allegations from the Trump administration that she made misrepresentations on mortgage documents, arguing in a new letter that she has “never committed mortgage fraud.”
In the letter to the White House dated Wednesday, Abbe Lowell, Cook’s lawyer, said that attempting to fire Cook on the basis of accusations made by Bill Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, would “ignore the facts and the law.” Lowell told White House counsel David Warrington that the claims against Cook are “unfounded and untrue.”
“Governor Cook has never committed mortgage fraud or any intentional wrongdoing, and there is no legally cognizable cause for removing her from the Federal Reserve Board,” he wrote.
Mr. Trump first tried to remove Cook from her post on the Fed’s Board of Governors last year after Pulte claimed she falsified mortgage documents related to two properties, one in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the other in Atlanta. Both properties were purchased before Cook was confirmed as a Fed governor during the Biden administration.
Cook filed a lawsuit challenging her removal as a violation of federal law, which allows the president to remove Fed governors only “for cause.” In June, the Supreme Court allowed Cook to continue serving in her role as her case proceeds in the lower courts. The high court said in its 5-4 decision that Cook was entitled to notice and the opportunity to respond to the allegations before she was terminated, which she did not receive.
Weeks after the Supreme Court handed down its decision, Mr. Trump mounted a new effort to oust Cook. The White House informed her in an Aug. 5 letter that the president was considering firing her because of the mortgage-fraud allegations and laid out the accusations against her. It set an Aug. 26 deadline for Cook to respond to the claims made by Pulte.
In the letter, White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino said that Cook signed a mortgage agreement classifying the Atlanta condominium as her “primary” residence, even though she signed a mortgage document that classified her home in Ann Arbor the same way. The White House also claimed that Cook listed the Atlanta property for rent roughly 14 months after signing the mortgage, even though she never disclosed rental income in financial disclosures for 2022 and 2023.
“There is a distinct nexus between a basic level of trustworthiness and care in financial matters and the duties of a Member of the Board of Governors,” Scavino wrote. “Because the allegations in the Criminal Referral reflect on your honesty, trustworthiness, and competence to perform the duties of the office you currently hold, the President has determined that there is reason to believe they constitute cause to remove you from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.”
Cook’s response
But Lowell said Cook’s signing of a “primary” mortgage agreement, which was provided to her by her lender, was “an entirely inadvertent oversight.” Cook also “regularly” indicated in submissions that her “primary” residence was in Michigan, and confirmed to her lender that the Atlanta property was a “2nd home,” he said. Lowell argued that it was within the lender’s discretion to classify the Atlanta mortgage as “primary” or “secondary.”
“Governor Cook’s apparent mistake on a form provided to her by her lender, which was aware of her other residences, was unintentional, not criminal, and occurred in her private capacity before she took office,” Lowell wrote.
He also noted that neither the White House’s letter nor Pulte stated that Cook received a preferential interest rate on any property.
Regarding the White House’s allegations that Cook failed to disclose rental income from her Atlanta property, Lowell told Warrington that while Cook briefly listed the condo for rent, she decided not to rent it.
Lowell went on to accuse Mr. Trump and members of his Cabinet, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Attorney General Todd Blanche, of listing two properties as “primary” residences on their own mortgage filings.
“The President clearly recognizes that making such a mistake does not render a person — not himself nor the five members of his cabinet — unfit for office,” he wrote. “Attempting to remove Governor Cook on the basis of these allegations of preoffice conduct would be ‘corrosive of the independence that Congress sought to preserve,’ … and would fall woefully short of the standard that the Supreme Court has set. And doing so selectively would raise troubling questions about why President Trump is singling out Governor Cook.”
In a separate statement, Lowell and Norm Eisen, another lawyer for Cook, said they are prepared to go back to court to challenge “any illegal attempt” to fire Cook.
Critics of the president have accused him of attempting to oust Cook in an effort to assert more control over the central bank and warned that his actions threatened the independence of the Fed. Mr. Trump also repeatedly attacked its former chairman, Jerome Powell, for failing to lower interest rates quickly enough.
Federal prosecutors in Washington, D.C., issued subpoenas to the Fed earlier this year as part of a criminal investigation into Powell related to the years-long project to renovate the central bank’s Washington, D.C., headquarters. But prosecutors ended the criminal probe after it became an obstacle to confirming Powell’s successor, Kevin Warsh.
Warsh, whom Mr. Trump selected to lead the Fed, took over as the new chair of its board in May.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-reacts-to-supreme-courts-split-rulings-on-presidential-firings/
Trump reacts to Supreme Court’s split rulings on presidential firings
(03:27)
发表回复