2026年8月24日 美国东部时间下午5:13 / 福克斯新闻
最高法院允许特朗普政府实施修订后的邮寄选票限制规定
作者：艾玛·巴西、莱奥·布里塞尼奥 福克斯新闻
发布时间：2026年8月24日 美国东部时间下午5:13 | 更新时间：2026年8月24日 美国东部时间下午6:31
福克斯新闻头条热点速递。点击FoxNews.com查看热门内容。
新功能：您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
周一，最高法院以6票赞成、3票反对的裁决结果，让特朗普政府取得胜利，允许其在11月中期选举前执行唐纳德·特朗普总统的“选举诚信”行政令，该政令对邮寄投票施加了限制。
最高法院解除了一项禁制令，该禁制令此前在23个质疑该政令的州阻止了其执行，而特朗普政府已于7月提起上诉。
美国邮政总局和司法部表示，他们将在裁决后立即实施修订后的邮寄选票限制规定。
最直接的影响是，该裁决为美国邮政总局根据国土安全部维护的公民名单核查邮寄选票的分发工作扫清了道路。这同时也是特朗普政府的重大政治胜利，该政府一直反对大规模使用邮寄投票，称其认为邮寄投票更容易被篡改和出现选民欺诈行为。
美国邮政总局发布新规，拒绝向未提供选民名单的州邮寄选票
2026年2月20日周五拍摄的最高法院外景。（安纳贝尔·戈登/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社）
就在最近，特朗普抨击了他所称的2026年洛杉矶市长初选投票中，辛西娅·拉曼获得的邮寄选票数量“异常之高”。
“你知道吗，他们没有投票站；一切都靠邮寄。我认为除非通过《拯救美国法案》，否则共和党人在加州赢不了，”特朗普在接受福克斯新闻采访时说道，他所指的是共和党旨在缩小邮寄投票范围并强化选民身份证要求的立法。
“他们必须废除邮寄投票制度。”
和许多观望的保守派人士一样，特朗普指出，选举夜过后，绝大多数民主党选票都投给了尼提亚·拉曼，这导致了后续的支持浪潮延迟出现。
福克斯新闻数字频道尚未核实任何与洛杉矶市长竞选相关的具体选举欺诈案件。
斯宾塞·普拉特输给民主党人，汉尔顿在最新加州选票批次统计中保持领先
斯宾塞·普拉特在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶竞选市长。（HIGHFIVE/鲍尔-格里芬/GC图片社）
即便如此，特朗普最初的行政令还是试图消除任何模糊地带。这项题为“维护和保护美国选举诚信”的行政令，指示各联邦机构编制符合资格选民的公民身份名单，并命令美国邮政总局仅向出现在这些批准名单上的选民邮寄选票。
“多项联邦法律，包括美国法典第18篇第1015条和第611条，禁止外国公民在联邦选举中登记投票或参与投票。然而各州未能充分核查选民的公民身份，近年来，司法部也未能优先分配足够资源来执行这些条款，”该行政令中写道。
该政令的批评者认为这是联邦政府干预州级选举的行为，但最高法院周一支持了特朗普政府的立场，称该行政令仅对联邦机构提出了要求。
从本质上讲，该政令并未对各州本身施加任何新的要求。
“[该政令]指示国土安全部部长采取适当行动，创建并分发州公民名单。这一条款是总统向下属发布的内部指令。它并未对各州施加任何义务，因此各州‘不会因此遭受具体损害’，而没有具体损害，就不具备起诉资格，”最高法院在裁决书中写道。
索尼娅·索托马约尔、埃琳娜·卡根和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊三位大法官持反对意见。
专家称：加州选举陷入僵局，四大压力因素拖慢计票进度
最高法院为特朗普总统在中期选举前推进限制邮寄投票的行政令扫清了道路。（iStock/福克斯新闻数字频道）
值得注意的是，最高法院明确表示，此次裁决仅针对此前阻止该政令执行的禁制令，并未涉及该政令本身的合法性。未来仍可能出现针对该政令的其他法律挑战。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
这是一则正在发展中的新闻。请随时返回查看最新进展。本文有美联社供稿。
艾玛·巴西是福克斯新闻数字频道的突发新闻撰稿人。加入福克斯新闻之前，她曾在《每日电讯报》美国夜班团队工作，涉及国际、政治、新闻、体育和文化等多个部门。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6360664094112
Trump scores Supreme Court win on mail-in voting restrictions before midterms
August 24, 2026 5:13pm EDT / Fox News
The Supreme Court allowed the Trump admin to enforce revised mail-ballot restrictions
By Emma Bussey , Leo Briceno, Fox News
Published August 24, 2026 5:13pm EDT | Updated August 24, 2026 6:31pm EDT
Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what’s clicking on FoxNews.com.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a victory on Monday, allowing it to enforce President Donald Trump’s “election integrity” executive order restricting mail-in voting ahead of the November midterms.
The high court lifted an injunction that had blocked the order in 23 states that challenged it after the administration appealed in July.
The U.S. Postal Service and Justice Department said they would immediately implement the revised mail-ballot restrictions after the ruling.
Most immediately, the ruling clears the path for the U.S. Postal Service to check its distribution of mail-in ballots against a list of citizens maintained by the Department of Homeland Security. But it’s also a significant political victory for the Trump administration as it has advocated against the widespread use of mail-in-voting, citing what it believes is a heightened vulnerability to tampering and voter fraud.
USPS PUBLISHES RULE TO BLOCK MAIL-IN BALLOTS FROM STATES THAT DON’T PROVIDE VOTER LISTS
The Supreme Court is seen on Friday, Feb. 20, 2026.(Annabelle Gordon/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Most recently, Trump slammed what he called a suspiciously high volume of mail-in-ballots cast for Cynthia Raman in the 2026 LA mayoral race primaries.
“You know, they don’t have voting booths; everything’s by mail. I don’t think a Republican can win in California unless you pass the Save America Act,” Trump told Fox News, referring to GOP legislation to narrow the scope of mail-in voting and voter-ID requirements.
“They’re going to have to get rid of mail-in voting.”
Like many onlooking conservatives, Trump pointed out that, after election night, the vast majority of Democratic votes had been for Nithya Raman, creating a delayed outpouring of support.
Fox News Digital has not reviewed any particular case of election fraud tied to the LA mayoral race.
SPENCER PRATT LOSES GROUND TO DEMOCRAT WHILE HILTON MAINTAINS LEAD IN LATEST CALIFORNIA BALLOT BATCH DROP
Spencer Pratt campaigns for mayor in Los Angeles, California.(HIGHFIVE/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)
Even so, Trump’s original executive order looked to eliminate any ambiguity. Titled “Preserving and protecting the integrity of American elections,” it directed federal agencies to compile citizenship-based lists of eligible voters and ordered the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail-in ballots only to people appearing on those approved lists.
“Several Federal laws, including 18 U.S.C. 1015 and 611, prohibit foreign nationals from registering to vote or voting in Federal elections. Yet States fail adequately to vet voters’ citizenship, and, in recent years, the Department of Justice has failed to prioritize and devote sufficient resources for enforcement of these provisions,” the executive order reads.
Where critics of the order saw a federal effort to dictate the terms of state-run elections, the court on Monday sided with the administration, stating that the way the executive order was made put requirements only on federal agencies.
In essence, the order didn’t put any new requirements on the states themselves.
“[It] directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to take appropriate action to create and distribute State Citizenship Lists. This provision is an internal directive from the President to a subordinate. It imposes no obligations on the States, so they ‘suffer no concrete harm from’ it, and without concrete harm, there is no standing,” the court wrote.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
CALIFORNIA ELECTION LIMBO FUELED BY 4 PRESSURE POINTS DRAGGING OUT VOTE COUNT, EXPERT SAYS
The Supreme Court cleared the way for President Trump to move ahead with an executive order restricting mail-in voting ahead of the midterms.(iStock/Fox News Digital)
Notably, the court stipulated that the ruling narrowly addresses the injunction that had prevented its implementation and does not speak to the lawfulness of the order itself. Further legal challenges against the order may still come down the road.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Emma Bussey is a breaking news writer for Fox News Digital. Before joining Fox, she worked at The Telegraph with the U.S. overnight team, across desks including foreign, politics, news, sport and culture.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6360664094112
发表回复