2026-08-24T18:12:33.375Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/trump-economy-midterms-blame-biden
共和党针对2026年中期选举前夕持续存在的经济困境所给出的回应,如今基本只剩下一个名词、一个动词和“乔·拜登”。
但美国总统唐纳德·特朗普根本无法停止破坏这种“归咎拜登”的策略,反而给其所在政党带来了新的重大麻烦。
他接连打出多记撼动经济的组合拳,这不仅危及共和党2026年的选举前景,还将经济状况直接与他本人及其政党绑定在一起。
近日来,特朗普变本加厉地对伊朗发动全面“经济诺曼底登陆”,这场行动可能拖到选举临近收尾阶段;他宣布大幅干预牛肉市场,可能损害国内产业;如今又似乎正式打响了与加拿大的贸易战。
这三项举措似乎都让党内至少部分人士感到不安,担忧它们会对2026年选举产生影响。
而后面两项举措,还可能在一些关乎参议院关键席位选举的州给共和党制造麻烦。
伊朗相关策略的核心疑问在于:这到底是一项明智的战略,还是在军事打击未能迫使伊朗屈服后,本届政府仅剩的可选方案?
无论如何,这场战略很可能将战争及其对美国经济的国内影响(说白了就是每加仑汽油4美元的油价),推到距离美国人投票仅71天的危险窗口期内。距离选举只剩71天,而对伊朗全面施加经济压力能否见效,还需要时间才能见分晓。
早在今年2月底行动启动时,本届政府就曾预测这场战争将持续四到六周。整件事已经导致共和党内部怨声载道,越来越多人担忧长期战争会危及他们在众议院和参议院的多数席位。
加剧这种政治焦虑的,还有特朗普近期另外两项可能对关键州产生重大影响的经济举措。
首先是特朗普为缓解牛肉价格高企的问题,决定暂时暂停对进口牛肉征收关税,并允许在未来90天内免税进口最多30万吨绞碎牛肉。
这项举措遭到了美国养牛业者的一致抨击。同时,几个养牛大州的共和党参议员也提出批评,他们所在州的产业可能因此受损,而这些州恰好都存在关键的参议院席位竞争。
美国两大养牛州分别是内布拉斯加州和得克萨斯州,两州都将在2026年举行重要的参议院选举。内布拉斯加州共和党参议员皮特·里基茨将于11月迎战独立候选人丹·奥斯本,他在X平台上发文称:“用低质量牛肉充斥市场,会损害内布拉斯加州的农场主和牧场主利益。”
爱荷华州的牛肉产量位列全美前十,今年该州也将举行竞争激烈的开放式参议院席位选举。该州共和党参议员查克·格拉斯利表示,他“对牛肉市场感到担忧”,并提及了横跨爱荷华州与伊利诺伊州边界、位于伊利诺伊州乔斯林的泰森牛肉加工厂近期关闭一事。该州开放式参议院席位的共和党候选人阿什利·希金森补充道:“我也想降低物价,但这项举措并非良策。”
而最不受欢迎的新举措,或许是特朗普将对加拿大商品征收的关税上调至50%。这有可能引发与美国北部邻国的激烈贸易战,在共和党处境极为不利的时刻推高物价。
此举还可能进一步推高共和党特别希望安抚的一些州的物价——也就是那些与加拿大接壤、且与加拿大贸易往来频繁的州,这些州都存在关键的参议院席位竞争。事实上,库克政治报告评级为“势均力敌”的六个州中,有四个与加拿大接壤:阿拉斯加州、缅因州、密歇根州和俄亥俄州。
缅因州的苏珊·柯林斯是2024年特朗普输掉的州中唯一寻求连任的共和党参议员,因此也是民主党重点攻击的目标。她于周六表示,关税“将增加缅因州家庭的生活成本”,贸易谈判的反复无常正导致“缅因州企业面临更高成本、风险和不确定性”。
参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩上月在被问及可能对加拿大征收50%关税时表示,他“总体而言并不十分支持关税”,并称尚未看到相关举措的“合理依据”。
但即便抛开对特定州的影响,这些举措也危及了共和党一贯的经济叙事——将责任推给拜登。
如今已经十分明显,当被问及持续存在的通胀和糟糕的就业数据时,共和党惯用的说辞就是指责拜登政府,以及其所谓的经济政策管理不善留下的遗留影响。通胀峰值其实在拜登任期内达到了更高水平(全球范围内亦是如此,新冠大流行期间皆是如此)。
将经济弊病归咎于前总统的策略,早在去年就已出现。但随着拜登实际卸任总统的时间不断推移(如今已超过19个月),这种策略的使用频率变得更高,也更加引人注目。
但特朗普早已破坏了这一叙事:他在第二任期之初就启动了全球性关税,又在今年2月挑起了对伊朗的战争——这两项重大行动让民众很容易将经济和通胀问题直接与他本人联系起来。
更重要的是,特朗普已经认领了经济的所有权。今年年初他告诉NBC新闻,如今的经济是“特朗普经济”。美国商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克在2025年9月也曾表示,“唐纳德·特朗普执掌的经济从今年年底开始”——也就是2026年日历开启之时。
选民们似乎也认同这一点。路透社-益普索今年2月的一项民调显示,大多数美国人表示特朗普将对重大经济问题承担更多责任,而认为拜登应承担更多责任的人寥寥无几。
如今,距离中期选举仅两个多月,特朗普却在继续推行这类曾让民众得出上述结论的重大经济干预举措。
本文已补充更多背景信息后更新。
Trump can’t stop rocking the economy — and causing more political problems for the GOP
2026-08-24T18:12:33.375Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/trump-economy-midterms-blame-biden
The Republican Party’s response to questions about the continued economic pain ahead of the 2026 midterm elections is now essentially: A noun, a verb and “Joe Biden.”
But President Donald Trump can’t stop undermining this blame-Biden strategy — and giving his party major new headaches.
He’s made several economy-shaking moves that not only risk the GOP’s 2026 hopes, but also link the state of the economy directly to him and his party.
In recent days, Trump has doubled down on an all-out “economic D-Day” against Iran that could drag into the closing weeks of the election, announced a major intervention into the beef market that could harm the domestic industry and now launched what appears to be a real trade war with Canada.
All three appear to be giving at least some in his party heartburn about what they could mean for the 2026 election.
And the latter moves could cause the GOP problems in some key states with crucial Senate races.
The big question with the Iran strategy: Is it actually a good strategy or is it just the strategy that the administration has left, after military strikes failed to force Iran to capitulate?
Regardless, it’s a strategy that likely brings the war and its domestic harm to the US economy (read: $4 per gallon gasoline) dangerously close to when Americans will be voting. The election is just 71 days away, and it will take time to figure out whether all-out economic pressure on Iran will pay dividends.
And this is a war that the administration predicted would last four to six weeks when it began in late February. The whole thing has led to increased grumbling and uncertainty among Republicans about a prolonged war endangering their House and Senate majorities.
Adding to that political anxiety are two other recent economic moves by Trump, which could play significantly in some important states.
First came Trump’s decision to try to alleviate high beef prices by temporarily pausing tariffs on imported beef, and allowing up to 300,000 metric tons of ground beef to be imported tariff-free for the next 90 days.
The move has been pretty roundly lambasted by US cattle producers. It’s also been criticized by GOP senators in some top cattle-producing states, whose industries could suffer. And some of them feature key Senate races.
The two top cattle-producing states are Nebraska and Texas, which are both hosting significant Senate races in 2026. Nebraska GOP Sen. Pete Ricketts, who faces independent Dan Osborn in November, posted on X: “Flooding the market with lower quality beef compromises Nebraska farmers and ranchers.”
Iowa is in the top 10 in that category and also has a competitive open Senate race this year. There, GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley said he was “concerned for the cattle markets” and cited the recent closure of a Tyson beef plant just across the Iowa-Illinois border in Joslin, Illinois. And Rep. Ashley Hinson, the GOP candidate in the state’s open Senate race, added: “I want to lower prices but this is a bad idea.”
And perhaps the most unwelcome new Trump move is his ramped-up 50% tariffs on Canadian goods. This risks a pitched trade war with the US’ northern neighbor that could raise prices at a very bad time for the GOP.
It could also raise prices more in some states Republicans particularly want to keep happy — i.e. more key Senate races in states that border Canada and trade extensively in it. In fact, four of the six states rated as toss-ups by the Cook Political Report border Canada: Alaska, Maine, Michigan and Ohio.
Maine’s Susan Collins, the only GOP senator up for reelection in a state Trump lost in 2024 and therefore a top Democratic target, said Saturday tariffs “will increase costs for Maine families” and that the whiplash of trade negotiations is causing “higher costs, risk, and uncertainty for Maine businesses.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said last month when asked about the potential 50% Canada tariffs that he was “not a huge fan of tariffs as a general rule” and said he had not seen a “rationale” for them.
But even beyond the impact on specific states, the moves jeopardize the GOP’s broader economic message — trying to pass the buck onto Biden.
It’s become abundantly clear that the stock GOP talking point on questions about persistent inflation and poor jobs numbers is to cite the Biden administration and the lingering effects of its purported economic mismanagement. Inflation peaked even higher back during Biden’s term (and that was also the case throughout the world amid the Covid-19 pandemic).
The administration’s strategy of blaming economic ills on the former president dates back to last year. But it has become much more conspicuous both in the frequency of its usage and because of the large amount of time elapsed since Biden was actually president (now more than 19 months).
But Trump already undercut that message by launching his global tariffs early in his second term and then the Iran war back in February — two major actions that made it very simple for people to connect whatever happened with the economy and inflation specifically to him.
What’s more, Trump already accepted ownership of the economy. He told NBC News early this year that it was now the “Trump economy.” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in September 2025 that the “economy that Donald Trump owns starts at the end of this year” — i.e. when the calendar turned to 2026.
And voters seem to agree. A Reuters-Ipsos poll in February showed that majorities of Americans said Trump would be more responsible for major economic problems, while very few said Biden would be more responsible.
Now Trump is doubling down on the same types of major economic interventions that led people to those conclusions, with just more than two months until the midterms.
This story has been updated with additional context.
发表回复