2026-08-24T10:02:54.532Z / reuters.com
提要
- 沃什将于周五在堪萨斯城联储主办的杰克逊霍尔研讨会上发表主旨演讲
- 财政部的债券市场操作可能让沃什的工作、美联储的政策传递变得复杂
- 全球储蓄紧缩给美国央行带来了截然不同的局面
华盛顿,8月24日(路透社)——美国联邦储备委员会主席凯文·沃什本周在年度杰克逊霍尔会议上的首次演讲,原本自称可在短期政策讨论或 broader 原则之间二选一,如今却多了一重分量:交易员和分析师正从中寻找关于近期债券收益率飙升的指引,以及确认他不受特朗普政府干预的独立性。
沃什曾表示,他要等今年春季上任后成立的五个工作组提交建议后,再详细阐述自己的计划。
路透社每日简报新闻通讯为您提供开启一天所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅。
但市场已经得出结论:美联储的政策利率需要进一步上调。美国通胀率已持续五年多高于2%的目标,沃什的同僚们担忧,如果联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)不加息将通胀拉回目标水平,央行的公信力可能受损。
在全球范围内,前美联储主席、诺贝尔经济学奖得主本·伯南克曾称之为“全球储蓄过剩”、压低市场利率的格局,如今已演变为全球储蓄紧缩:不断攀升的政府债务、支离破碎的国际贸易和供应链、人口老龄化带来的成本,以及蓬勃发展的人工智能私人投资,都在争夺可用于投资和放贷的美元。
彼得森国际经济研究所所长亚当·波森表示:“债券市场和FOMC显然都已经‘醒悟’,要正视更高的通胀,以及即将到来的‘长期、多年度的利率上行趋势’。”
考虑到沃什在上月货币政策会议后的新闻发布会上留下了诸多悬而未决的问题,波森说,这位美联储主席应该少谈他想要推行的长期理念,多谈谈央行当下如何评估经济,以及近期全球市场动态的影响。
“他应该说:‘我已经观察了数据,正如我此前所言,我倾听了市场的信号,也听取了委员会的意见。显然,如果数据没有变化,我们有理由在未来几个月考虑加息,’”波森说道。
财政部的深远影响
沃什定于周五在怀俄明州杰克逊霍尔举行的堪萨斯城联储年度研究研讨会上发表主旨演讲。
这场研讨会汇聚了全球参会者,受到媒体高度关注,为美国央行领导人提供了一个高调发声、定调或强化政策信号的平台。例如,前美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔曾借助该场合公布新的货币政策框架,之后又在会上发表了简短却引人注目的抗通胀承诺,坚定了市场对一系列快速加息的预期。
在7月28日至29日的货币政策会议后被问及演讲计划时,沃什告诉记者他尚未确定,但表示他希望“厘清重大问题。如今会议和新闻发布会越来越多,人们很容易陷入短视的思维定式”。
但细节至关重要。那次新闻发布会未解决关键政策问题后,沃什已经面临呼吁,要求他更清晰地阐述如何评估经济面临的风险,以及美联储可能做出的应对——这些话题他一直避而不谈,因为他反感“前瞻性指引”。
自那以来,局势变得更加复杂。
美国和全球债券收益率近期飙升,以及财政部长斯科特·贝森特决定干预市场,都增加了一种可能性:沃什可能不得不应对更加激进的财政部和不断攀升的政府债务成本——理论上,除非政府融资出现问题,或财政部的融资选择开始影响短期利率,否则这些并非美联储的关切范畴。
美联储的主要政策工具是隔夜利率,如果该利率与短期政府债券利率之间出现缺口,可能会让央行的利率管理变得更加困难。
过去一个月美元对其他主要货币持续贬值,也可能加剧通胀。
“我们正处于这样一个 regime:激进的财政部政策与央行政策一样重要——无论好坏。两者的互动将是决定经济前景的关键,”曾担任纽约联储高级官员、现任Evercore ISI副主席的克里希纳·古哈上周在与其他分析师评估债券收益率上升时写道。
“沃什试图提出一个非常规观点:美联储应该退居幕后,让市场自行形成不受干预的收益率曲线……同时暗示,长期端收紧货币政策可能比短期端收紧更可取。但当投资者认为贝森特正试图管控长期端收益率时,这一观点很难成立,”古哈说道。
“渐入佳境”
与此同时,参议院银行委员会的民主党议员要求沃什提供他与总统唐纳德·特朗普沟通的细节,此前《华尔街日报》报道称两人一直在定期通电话。
尽管特朗普迄今并未批评沃什——这位总统亲自任命的美联储最高官员没有像此前要求鲍威尔那样降息——但沃什不愿谈论政策,这让人质疑他对经济的评估,以及他是否为避免激怒特朗普而隐瞒了加息观点。
在7月28日至29日货币政策会议的纪要中,沃什的一些同僚担忧,推迟加息可能需要在未来更大幅度、更高成本地上调借贷成本;另一些同僚则担忧,通胀持续高于2%的时间越长,公众越有可能对美联储实现通胀目标的承诺失去信心。
加州大学伯克利分校经济学教授、前国际货币基金组织首席经济学家莫里斯·奥布斯特费尔德表示,债券市场的表现可能反映了这些担忧。
“他显然正在渐入佳境,在一个充满争议的环境中履职,”奥布斯特费尔德说道,背景是即将举行的美国中期选举可能改变特朗普第二任期的后半段格局,以及债券市场的剧烈波动。
“市场在疑惑,美联储将采取什么措施来应对持续高于目标的通胀,”他说。“通胀压力完全有可能导致未来需要更大幅度加息,这也是你看到长期收益率出现波动的原因。”
本周的演讲“是澄清他想法的绝佳机会”,奥布斯特费尔德说道。
霍华德·施奈德报道;安·萨菲尔补充报道;丹·伯恩斯、保罗·西毛编辑
Bond market anxiety raises stakes for Warsh’s debut Jackson Hole speech
2026-08-24T10:02:54.532Z / reuters.com
Summary
- Warsh to deliver keynote address on Friday at Kansas City Fed’s Jackson Hole symposium
- Treasury’s bond market actions could complicate Warsh’s job, Fed messaging
- Global savings squeeze presents US central bank with a different landscape
WASHINGTON, Aug 24 (Reuters) – U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh’s debut speech at the annual Jackson Hole conference this week, self-advertised as a choice between discussing near-term policy or broader principles, has taken on added weight as traders and analysts look for guidance about the recent jump in bond yields and for reassurance of his independence from the Trump administration.
Warsh has said he wants to wait for recommendations from five task forces established at the start of his tenure this spring before getting too detailed about his plans.
The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
But markets have already sped towards a conclusion that the Fed’s policy interest rate needs to be higher, with U.S. inflation above the 2% target for more than five years and Warsh’s colleagues concerned that if the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee doesn’t hike rates to get inflation back to that level, the central bank’s credibility could suffer.
Globally, what former Fed Chair and Nobel Economics Prize winner Ben Bernanke deemed a “global savings glut” that kept market interest rates low has evolved into a global savings squeeze with rising government debts, fractured international trade and supply lines, the costs of population aging, and booming private investment in artificial intelligence competing to divvy up the dollars available to invest and lend.
“Both the bond market and the FOMC have clearly decided to wake up” to account for higher inflation and what promises to become “a secular, multi-year uptrend in interest rates,” said Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Given the questions Warsh left open after his post-meeting press conference last month, Posen said the Fed chief needed to dwell less on the long-term ideas he wants to pursue and more on how the central bank is evaluating the economy in the here and now along with the implications of recent global market developments.
“What he should say is ‘I have watched the data, listened to the market as I said I would, listened to the committee, and clearly there is reason to consider a hike in coming months if data does not change,’” Posen said.
TREASURY’S LONG SHADOW
Warsh is scheduled to deliver a keynote address on Friday at the Kansas City Fed’s annual research symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
The conference, with its global audience and intense media coverage, offers U.S. central bank leaders a high-profile way to set a tone or emphasize a message. Former Fed Chair Jerome Powell, for example, used the venue to unveil a new monetary policy framework, then later for a succinct, attention-grabbing pledge to fight inflation that helped cement market expectations for a series of swift rate hikes.
Asked after the July 28-29 meeting about his plans for the speech, Warsh told reporters he had not decided yet, but noted his desire to “frame the big questions. There is a tendency, especially with the proliferation of meetings and press conferences, to get caught up in the myopic.”
But the details matter. After that press conference left key policy questions unaddressed, Warsh was already facing calls to speak more clearly about how he evaluates the risks facing the economy and the Fed’s likely reaction to them, topics he has avoided because of his distaste for “forward guidance.”
Since then, the situation has become even more complicated.
The recent jump in U.S. and global bond yields and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s decision to intervene in the market have raised the possibility that Warsh will have to account for a more activist Treasury Department and rising government debt costs — in theory not the Fed’s concern unless government financing starts to stumble or Treasury’s financing choices start to influence short-term interest rates.
The Fed’s key policy tool is an overnight interest rate, and gaps between that and short-term government debt rates, if they emerge, could make the central bank’s management of rates more difficult.
The impact on the value of the dollar, which has been falling over the last month against other major currencies, could also add to inflation.
“We are in a regime where activist Treasury policy is as material — for good and for bad — as central bank policy. The interaction of the two will be key to the outlook,” Krishna Guha, a former top New York Fed official who is now vice chairman of Evercore ISI, wrote last week as he and other analysts assessed rising bond yields.
“Warsh has tried to make the unconventional case that the Fed should stand back and let the market form an unguided yield curve … while hinting long-end tightening might be preferable to short-end tightening. It is hard to make that case when investors see Bessent as trying to manage the long end,” Guha said.
‘FINDING HIS FEET’
Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee, meanwhile, have asked Warsh to provide details on his communications with President Donald Trump, a move that followed a Wall Street Journal report that the two men have been holding regular calls.
While Trump has so far withheld any criticism of Warsh, whom he chose for the top Fed job, for not cutting interest rates, as the president consistently demanded of Powell, Warsh’s reluctance to talk about policy has left open questions about both his evaluation of the economy and whether he is holding back on his view of rate hikes to avoid angering Trump.
In the minutes of the July 28-29 meeting, some of Warsh’s colleagues worried that waiting to hike rates would require steeper and costlier increases in borrowing costs later, while others worried that the longer inflation remains above 2% the more likely the public is to lose faith in the Fed’s commitment to its target.
The bond market’s behavior may be reflecting those concerns, said Maurice Obstfeld, a former International Monetary Fund chief economist who is now an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley.
“He’s clearly finding his feet and operating in a very charged environment,” given upcoming U.S. midterm elections that could alter the final half of Trump’s second term in the White House and volatile bond markets, Obstfeld said.
“Markets are wondering what’s the Fed going to do to address inflation that’s persistently above target,” he said. “There’s certainly the possibility that inflation pressures lead to the need for steeper rate increases down the road, which is why you see some of this action in longer-term yields.”
The speech this week “is a perfect opportunity to clarify his thinking,” Obstfeld said.
Reporting by Howard Schneider; Additional reporting by Ann Saphir; Editing by Dan Burns and Paul Simao
发表回复