2026年8月14日 美国东部时间下午4:03 / 福克斯新闻
法官认定相关事件过于“零散且偶发”，无法证明哈佛在联邦部门发出通知后仍违反《第六编》
作者：伊莱恩·马伦 福克斯新闻
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章播报！
波士顿一名联邦法官驳回了政府起诉哈佛大学长期对校园内反犹主义“视而不见”的案件后，司法部正筹划下一步行动。
“我们对该裁决表示异议，正在评估后续步骤，”民权司助理部长哈米特·迪隆在一份声明中说道。
“民权司拥有广泛且活跃的反犹主义执法工作，包括全国范围内的起诉、公诉、和解与调查。”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391400458112
司法部就所谓反犹主义问题起诉哈佛
司法部对哈佛大学提起了前所未有的联邦诉讼，指控这所常春藤盟校未能保护犹太学生免受骚扰和反犹主义困扰。布兰迪斯人权中心主席肯尼思·马库斯就此次法律行动发表评论称，特朗普政府正要求哈佛为其在持续的校园抗议活动中被指故意漠视犹太学生的行为负责。
由比尔·克林顿总统任命的理查德·斯滕斯法官周四驳回了特朗普政府针对这所常春藤盟校的诉讼，认定反犹主义事件过于零散，无法证明在联邦政府提出指控后，该校仍持续违反联邦民权法。
司法部就反以色列营地期间所谓“犹太纯化”状况起诉加州大学洛杉矶分校
唐纳德·特朗普总统表示，他正寻求从哈佛大学获得10亿美元的赔偿。(盖蒂图片社)
“尽管不会轻视这些事件引发的任何担忧，但法院认定，无论单独来看还是整体而言，这些事件都过于零散且偶发，无法合理推断出哈佛至今仍存在系统性违反《第六编》的行为，”斯滕斯写道。
司法部于2026年3月20日对哈佛提起诉讼，此前全国高校校园爆发了一波反以色列抗议活动，起因是哈马斯2023年10月7日对以色列的袭击以及随后的加沙战争。
在哈佛，2023至2024学年的抗议活动包括多次占领图书馆和其他校园建筑，以及在哈佛园持续数周的营地活动。犹太学生报告称遭到骚扰、恐吓，被排除在校园空间之外。
司法部指控哈佛违反了《第六编》，因为尽管有学生向校方领导举报此类行为，哈佛仍未能保护犹太和以色列学生免受骚扰。
但斯滕斯表示，司法部仅提及了下一学年哈佛据称未能处理的三起哈佛校园内的反犹事件。
加州大学洛杉矶分校学生议会谴责与前以色列人质相关的校园活动
2023年10月14日，巴勒斯坦支持者在马萨诸塞州剑桥市的一场集会上聚集，声援加沙的巴勒斯坦人。(约瑟夫·普雷齐奥索/法新社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄)
这些事件包括：抗议者 allegedly 闯入前以色列总理纳夫塔利·本内特出席一场活动的场外 barricades，一名哈佛员工 allegedly 拆除以色列人质海报，以及60多名蒙面抗议者在威德纳图书馆外举行“躺平抗议”，并高呼“我们将纪念我们所有的殉道者”。
斯滕斯并未就哈佛在校园动荡最严重时期是否违反《第六编》作出裁决。相反，他的判决聚焦于司法部是否充分指控在政府正式通知哈佛后，该校仍持续存在违规行为。
特朗普政府于2025年6月30日向哈佛发出警告信，称该校在应对校园反犹主义问题上违反了《第六编》。
根据该法规，政府在采取执法行动前，必须通知违规接收方并尝试通过自愿方式解决问题。
司法部在“黎巴嫩抵抗”筹款活动后对蓝州大学启动反犹主义审查
2023年的一场校园抗议中，特蒂-塔姆克洛被拍到与一名哈佛商学院一年级学生对峙。(帕特·格林豪斯/《波士顿环球报》通过盖蒂图片社拍摄)
在驳回诉讼的判决中，斯滕斯表示，特朗普政府2026年6月的修正起诉书并未指出任何一起政府发出警告信后哈佛未能处理反犹主义事件的情况。
“政府为此次诉讼提供的必要通知已于2025年6月30日发出，”斯滕斯写道。“如上所述，修正起诉书缺乏任何合理的事实指控，能够证明2025年6月30日后发生了任何可被视为不合规证据的事件。”
斯滕斯还驳回了特朗普政府的一项指控，即哈佛大学拒绝配合联邦政府提出的自愿协议中的每项要求，这表明该校并未遵守《第六编》。
“哈佛拒绝遵循政府提出的每项具体要求并不足以构成违规，因为法律问题在于哈佛是否遵守了《第六编》——而非哈佛是否完全按照政府的要求行事，”斯滕斯写道。
订阅获取政治新闻通讯
此次驳回诉讼之际，特朗普政府正对加州大学提起两起诉讼，指控该校在加州大学洛杉矶分校存在针对犹太和以色列学生、教职员工的歧视行为。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系哈佛大学置评。
伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的撰稿人，报道全国政治新闻。
Judge’s Harvard antisemitism ruling sends Trump Justice Department back to drawing board
August 14, 2026 4:03pm EDT / Fox News
Judge found incidents too ‘isolated and episodic’ to show Harvard remained in violation of Title VI after federal notice
By Elaine Mallon, Fox News
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Justice Department is planning its next move after a federal judge in Boston dismissed its case accusing Harvard University of repeatedly turning a “blind eye” to antisemitism on campus.
“We disagree with the ruling and are assessing next steps,” Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Harmeet Dhillon said in a statement.
“The Civil Rights Division has an extensive and active portfolio of antisemitism enforcement, including indictments, prosecutions, settlements and investigations across the country.”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391400458112
Justice Department sues Harvard over alleged antisemitism
The Justice Department filed an unprecedented federal lawsuit against Harvard University, accusing the Ivy League institution of failing to protect Jewish students from harassment and antisemitism. Kenneth Marcus, chairman of the Brandeis Center for Human Rights, discusses the legal action, stating the Trump administration is holding Harvard accountable for its alleged deliberate indifference towards Jewish students amidst ongoing campus protests.
Judge Richard Stearns, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, dismissed the Trump administration’s lawsuit against the Ivy League school Thursday, determining the incidents of antisemitism were too isolated to establish a pattern showing that the school remained in violation of federal civil rights law after the federal government issued its complaint.
DOJ SUES UCLA OVER ALLEGED ‘JUDENREIN’ CONDITIONS DURING ANTI-ISRAEL ENCAMPMENT
President Donald Trump said he is seeking $1 billion in damages from Harvard University.(Getty Images)
“Without diminishing any concern arising from these occurrences, the court finds them, singly and collectively, to be too isolated and episodic to support a plausible inference that any institutionalized noncompliance with Title VI persists at Harvard to this day,” Stearns wrote.
The Justice Department filed its lawsuit against Harvard March 20, 2026, after a wave of anti-Israel protests that erupted on college campuses nationwide after Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel and the ensuing war in Gaza.
At Harvard, protests during the 2023-24 school year included repeated occupations of libraries and other campus buildings and a weekslong encampment in Harvard Yard. Jewish students reported being harassed, intimidated and excluded from campus spaces.
The Justice Department alleged that Harvard violated Title VI by failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students from harassment despite complaints to university leaders about the conduct.
But Stearns said the Justice Department referred to only three antisemitic incidents on Harvard’s campus during the following school year that the school had allegedly failed to address.
UCLA STUDENT COUNCIL CONDEMNS CAMPUS EVENT WITH FORMER ISRAELI HOSTAGE
Supporters of Palestine gather at Harvard University to show their support for Palestinians in Gaza at a rally in Cambridge, Mass., Oct. 14, 2023.(Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images)
Those incidents included protesters allegedly breaching barricades outside an event featuring former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, a Harvard employee allegedly removing posters of Israeli hostages and more than 60 masked protesters staging a “die-in” outside Widener Library, where they chanted, “We will honor all our martyrs.”
Stearns did not rule on whether Harvard had violated Title VI during the height of the campus unrest. Instead, his decision focused on whether the Justice Department had sufficiently alleged that violations continued after the government formally put Harvard on notice.
The Trump administration sent Harvard a warning letter June 30, 2025, saying the school had violated Title VI over its response to antisemitism on campus.
Under the statute, the government is required to notify a recipient of a violation and try to resolve it voluntarily before taking enforcement action.
DOJ SPRINGS ANTISEMITISM REVIEW ON BLUE STATE COLLEGE AFTER ‘LEBANESE RESISTANCE’ FUNDRAISER
In 2023, at a campus protest, Tettey-Tamaklo was filmed confronting a first-year Harvard Business School student.(Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
In his dismissal, Stearns said the Trump administration’s amended June 2026 complaint did not identify any incidents in which Harvard failed to address antisemitism after the government sent its warning letter.
“The Government provided the requisite notice underlying this action on June 30, 2025,” Stearns wrote. “As noted above, the Amended Complaint is devoid of any factual allegations plausibly establishing that any events that might be construed as evidence of noncompliance occurred after June 30, 2025.”
Stearns also rejected the Trump administration’s allegation that Harvard University’s failure to cooperate with every demand in the federal government’s proposed voluntary agreement showed that the school was not in compliance with Title VI.
“Harvard’s refusal to follow every specific demand from the administration wasn’t enough, because the legal question was whether Harvard was complying with Title VI — not whether Harvard was doing exactly what the administration told it to do,” Stearns wrote.
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
The dismissal comes as the Trump administration pursues two lawsuits against the University of California over alleged discrimination against Jewish and Israeli students, faculty and staff at UCLA.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox News Digital reached out to Harvard University for comment.
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
发表回复