密歇根初选成民主党选民对以色列态度关键考验


2026-08-04T10:06:56.862Z / 路透社

华盛顿8月4日电(路透社)——密歇根州选民将于周二前往投票站参加一场事关重大的民主党参议院初选,在美国国内围绕美国对以色列支持的激烈内部辩论背景下,这场初选可能会影响国会控制权的争夺以及民主党未来走向。

此次初选的对阵双方分别是进步派人士阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德和现任美国众议员黑利·史蒂文斯。埃尔赛义德曾担任公共卫生官员,主张终止美国对以色列无条件的军事援助,并指责以色列犯下种族灭绝罪行;史蒂文斯则属于温和派,得到亲以色列团体的支持,长期以来直言不讳地支持以色列。

点击此处注册订阅。

这场竞选是进步派与温和派围绕美国对以色列支持政策展开的最新交锋,这一议题今年已在全国范围内的初选中多次引发争议。但与自由派堡垒州的初选不同,此次是中西部关键摇摆州的全州性选举,正值11月中期选举前夕——民主党必须拿下这个参议院席位才能掌握参议院控制权。

接受路透社采访的分析师和政党策略师表示,此次初选结果可能是迄今为止最明确的信号,能反映民主党选民是否更能接受反建制派、反对以色列并抵制政坛巨额资金的主张,或是更倾向于支持以色列的温和路线。

前奥巴马政府巴以谈判特使弗兰克·洛温斯坦表示,这场初选是民主党意识形态未来的风向标,可能会影响2028年总统候选人如何处理与以色列的关系。
“这将帮助他们判断在以色列问题上需要采取多强硬的立场,”他说,“这场初选已经准备好给出一个相当明确的选择。”

路透社/益普索的民调显示,民主党人对以色列的好感度已从2018年的59%降至今年5月的22%。

但民主党策略师表示,此次初选同时也是对选民在经济问题上的普遍不满以及对政党建制派不满情绪的一次检验。

如果埃尔赛义德获胜,将凸显推动要求更换领导层的愤怒情绪,以及他呼吁将纳税人资金重新投入国内而非用于以色列在加沙的战争的主张所具有的吸引力。

如果史蒂文斯获胜,则表明尽管面临反建制派的逆风,她仍成功阐明了自己的立场,经济问题和击败共和党人的愿望压倒了对以色列政策的分歧。

“无论结果如何,民主党领导人都不应忽视助长埃尔赛义德竞选活动的对现状的愤怒情绪,也不应假设史蒂文斯获胜就能让民主党置身事外,”民主党策略师卡伦·芬尼说道。

密歇根州、弗吉尼亚州和华盛顿州的选民周二还将在民主党初选中选出美国众议院候选人,其中多场竞选可能决定民主党能否夺回众议院多数席位。其中四个选区被认为是大选胜负难料的摇摆选区。

进步派与温和派各自站队

参议院初选的获胜者将对阵前共和党众议员迈克·罗杰斯,他是以色列的直言不讳的支持者,而密歇根州在2024年总统选举中仅以微弱优势被唐纳德·特朗普拿下。

埃尔赛义德得到了两位知名进步派人士的背书,并与他们共同举办了集会:佛蒙特州参议员伯尼·桑德斯和纽约州众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹。

分析师表示,有利于埃尔赛义德的一个重要因素是,密歇根州拥有美国规模最大的阿拉伯裔社区之一,当地民众对以色列的敌意根深蒂固。

近期民调显示,埃尔赛义德的平均领先优势为8个百分点,但7月初《底特律新闻》的一项民调显示史蒂文斯领先7个百分点。

埃尔赛义德支持全民医保、废除美国移民及海关执法局、将企业资金赶出政坛等进步事业。他在接受路透社采访时表示,终止美国对以色列无条件的军事援助不仅是人权问题,也是为了帮助美国家庭。
“加沙和以色列问题关乎民众负担能力。我宁愿把钱花在国内的医疗、教育和基础设施上,而不是用于轰炸其他国家的民众。”

埃尔赛义德表示,他一直聚焦于影响密歇根选民的议题,而民主党领导人试图将这场竞选重新包装为对政党未来的全国性公投。

史蒂文斯及其盟友认为,她会是对抗罗杰斯更强有力的大选候选人,因为在这场胜负取决于微弱优势的选举中,她更有可能吸引独立选民。

史蒂文斯得到了政党建制派的支持,包括参议院民主党领袖查克·舒默和连任两届的密歇根州州长格蕾琴·惠特默。

在发给路透社的电子邮件回复中,史蒂文斯基本拒绝回答有关以色列的问题,也拒绝回应她从亲以色列团体收取的资金,其中包括来自美国以色列公共事务委员会主要超级政治行动委员会的逾3000万美元捐款。美国以色列公共事务委员会是华盛顿最具影响力的外交政策游说组织之一。
“除了密歇根州人民,没有人能影响我的投票立场,”她说道。

史蒂文斯曾批评以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡,包括在7月的一场辩论中。“内塔尼亚胡先生没有让我们更安全,也没有让我们更接近和平。他危及了美国国内和世界各地的犹太人,”她说。

蒂姆·里德报道,罗斯·科尔文与阿利斯泰尔·贝尔编辑

本社报道遵循路透社信托原则。

Michigan primary offers key test of Democratic voters’ views on Israel

2026-08-04T10:06:56.862Z / Reuters

WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) – Michigan voters head to the polls on Tuesday in a high-stakes Democratic Senate primary that could shape the battle for control of Congress and the future of the Democratic Party amid a fierce ​internal debate over U.S. support for Israel.

The contest pits Abdul El-Sayed, a progressive former public health official who wants to end unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel ​and accuses it of genocide, against U.S. Representative Haley Stevens, a moderate backed by pro-Israel groups and a longtime outspoken supporter of Israel.

Sign up here.

The race is the latest battleground between progressives and moderates over U.S. support for Israel, an issue that has played out in primaries nationwide this year. But unlike contests in liberal bastions, this is a statewide race in a critical Midwestern swing state ahead of November’s midterms — a seat Democrats must win in the ​fight for Senate control.

The outcome could offer the clearest signal yet of whether Democratic voters are more receptive to an anti-establishment message hostile to Israel and big money in politics, ​or a more moderate approach supportive of Israel, according to analysts and party strategists interviewed by Reuters.

Frank Lowenstein, a former special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian ⁠negotiations under President Barack Obama, said the primary was a bellwether for Democrats’ ideological future and could shape how their 2028 presidential candidates approach relations with Israel.

“This will help inform them about how ​tough to be on Israel,” he said. “It’s teed up to be a pretty clear choice.”

Israel’s favorability rating among Democrats fell from 59% in 2018 to 22% in May, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling.

But, the ​primary is also a test of broader voter frustrations over economic concerns and the party establishment, Democratic strategists said.

An El-Sayed win would underscore the anger fueling demand for new leadership — and the appeal of his call to reinvest taxpayer dollars at home rather than in Israel’s war in Gaza.

A Stevens win would signal she made her case despite anti-establishment headwinds, with economic concerns and the desire to beat Republicans outweighing Israel.

“Either way, Democratic leaders shouldn’t ​ignore the anger at the status quo fueling El-Sayed’s campaign or assume a Stevens win lets the party off the hook,” Democratic strategist Karen Finney said.

Voters in Michigan, Virginia and Washington State will ​also be deciding on U.S. House candidates in Democratic primaries on Tuesday, including a handful that could decide if the party retakes the lower chamber. Four of those races are considered general election toss-ups.

PROGRESSIVES AND MODERATES ​TAKE SIDES

The ⁠winner of the Senate primary will face former Republican Representative Mike Rogers, a vocal supporter of Israel in a state President Donald Trump narrowly won in 2024.

El-Sayed has been endorsed by and held rallies with two high-profile progressives: Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York.

Analysts say one significant factor in his favor is that Michigan is home to some of the country’s largest Arab-American communities, where hostility to Israel runs deep.

Recent polls show El-Sayed leading by an average of 8 percentage points, although one Detroit News survey in early July had Stevens up by 7 percentage ​points.

El-Sayed supports progressive causes like universal healthcare, abolishing ​U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and getting ⁠corporate money out of politics. He told Reuters in an interview that ending unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel was not just a human rights issue, but about helping American families.

“Gaza and Israel is an affordability issue. I would rather spend our money on healthcare and schools and infrastructure here ​at home rather than bombing other people elsewhere.”

El-Sayed said he had focused on issues affecting Michigan voters, while Democratic leaders had sought to ​recast the race as a ⁠national referendum on the party’s future.

Stevens and her allies argue that she would make a stronger general election candidate against Rogers because she is more likely to appeal to independents in a race expected to be decided at the margins.

Stevens has been backed by the party establishment, including Chuck Schumer, the top Senate Democrat, and Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan’s two-term governor.

In emailed responses to Reuters, Stevens largely declined to answer questions ​about Israel ​or the money she has taken from pro-Israel groups, including over $30 million from the main super PAC for the American ​Israel Public Affairs Committee, one of Washington’s most influential foreign-policy lobbying organizations.

“No one influences my vote other than the people of Michigan,” she said.

Stevens has been critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, including in a July debate. “Mr. Netanyahu has ​not made us safer, has not brought us closer to peace. And he’s endangered Jews here in America and around the world,” she said.

Reporting by Tim Reid, Editing by Ross Colvin and Alistair Bell

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2