2026-08-02T16:00:26.430Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/02/politics/airport-search-left-wing-activist-phone-code-fourth-amendment
在亚特兰大国际机场的一间小房间里,一名左翼活动家、美国公民称边境巡逻人员未持搜查令,无视他的抗议和聘请律师的请求,开始搜查他的电子设备、行李和日记。
据他的律师透露,参与“停止警察城”运动的萨姆·图尼克当时正从多米尼加共和国度假归来,这场运动反对佐治亚州一座于2025年4月启用的85英亩执法训练中心。当时,边境巡逻人员与联邦调查局协作,将他拦了下来。
图尼克和检察官表示,在拒绝回答问题后,执法人员开始搜查图尼克及其随身物品,并最终要求解锁他的手机。据检察官称,图尼克随后向执法人员提供了一个会擦除设备内所有内容的密码。
同年11月,图尼克被指控一项罪名:为阻止扣押而毁坏财物。他已提出无罪抗辩,并未面临其他任何犯罪指控。
专家告诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN),这起案件可能成为挑战第四修正案保护力度的一个切入点。第四修正案通常禁止在无合理依据的情况下进行搜查和扣押,但在美国边境及包括国际机场在内的入境点,这一保护正被削弱。
“并非第四修正案在边境不适用,”白领刑事辩护律师保罗·卡利告诉CNN,“区别在于,边境搜查不需要合理怀疑,而在其他地方则需要。”
图尼克的律师称,执法人员在要求解锁手机前曾告知他,怀疑他持有儿童色情内容。但据图尼克的律师透露,在上周关于压制此次搜查所获证据和证词的听证会上,海关和边境保护局(CBP)的执法人员承认,没有任何理由怀疑图尼克持有儿童性虐待材料。
“他们明确表示,不,我们没有任何理由认为这适用于萨姆,这只是我们的套路,用来让他松口的,”图尼克的律师马修·多奇告诉CNN。
海关和边境保护局表示,执法人员有权搜查任何入境美国人员的电子设备,“无论其国籍为何”。
据图尼克的律师称,尽管图尼克抗议并拒绝配合搜查,执法人员还是先搜查了他的行李和私人日记,随后才转向他的手机。
图尼克称,他还多次向执法人员出示自己随身携带的律师名片。
“因为你拒绝配合问话,这是你的权利,但我们有权搜查你的手机,看看我们在找什么,”提供给图尼克律师的事件录像中,一名执法人员这样说道。
CNN并未查看该段录像。
当图尼克第二次询问为何不允许他联系律师时,他得到的答复是:“涉及移民和海关事务时,情况完全不同。”
据图尼克的律师3月提交的法庭文件显示,有人告诉他:“我们有搜查权,不需要搜查令。”
图尼克的律师还声称,他们的当事人从未被宣读米兰达权利,也没有机会获得律师在场。
“萨姆此举的主要目的是保护隐私,而非藏匿不当行为的证据,”多奇说。
图尼克的律师在3月的法庭文件中称,此次搜查是因为他参与了反对执法训练中心的团体。
在建设期间,这座亚特兰大的训练中心曾是抗议活动的热点,有时还会与警方发生暴力冲突。当局指控数十名据称与抗议活动有关的活动分子。2023年1月,一名男子在训练中心附近向警方开枪后,被执法人员射杀57枪。
边境豁免权与妨碍调查的争议
当被问及这起案件时,海关和边境保护局告诉CNN,该局有权搜查所有出入境美国人员的电子设备,无论其国籍,“以执行针对恐怖主义、儿童剥削、毒品和人口走私、签证欺诈以及国家安全威胁的法律”。
声明补充道:“边境搜查仅会检查设备在接受检查时存储的信息。在2025财年,所有抵达的国际旅客中,仅有不到0.01%的人的电子设备被海关和边境保护局搜查过。”
然而,这一权限的限制可能会通过图尼克这类案件受到挑战。
“我们希望,‘第四修正案在边境不适用’这一通用规则能够得到修订和纠正,”多奇说,“这就是一个生动的例子,说明这条规则过于宽泛。”
“针对机场场景的第四修正案保护,必须制定更具针对性的规则,”多奇补充道。
美国公民自由联盟负责言论、隐私和技术项目的副主任内森·弗里德·韦瑟在泛谈无搜查令扣押时告诉CNN,目前有几起“正在上诉法院审理的案件,这个问题确实亟待解决”。
“几家联邦上诉法院已经实施了比政府主张的更严格的限制,”韦瑟补充道,“还有少数联邦地区法院法官干脆直接裁定,必须持有搜查令,因为这种搜查对隐私造成了极大的侵犯。”
不过,对图尼克案件拥有管辖权的第十一巡回上诉法院此前曾裁定,手机和电子设备并不比行李箱或手提包享有更多保护,尽管这些设备中存储着大量个人信息,韦瑟指出。
另外一个悬而未决的问题是,向执法人员提供擦除设备信息的密码是否构成妨碍调查。
“妨碍调查意味着我正在阻碍某项调查,但在没有任何搜查令,甚至没有合理怀疑存在犯罪活动的情况下,我到底在妨碍什么调查?”专注于公民自由问题的智库卡托研究所的法律研究员迈克·福克斯告诉CNN。
福克斯指出,目前尚不清楚如果一个人在类似的无搜查令搜查中拒绝交出手机密码,联邦执法人员会采取什么措施。
“他们不会因为他是美国公民就拒绝他入境,”他说,“但他们会不会以妨碍调查的罪名起诉他,或者扣押他的设备?”
“这是全新的、未知的领域,”福克斯补充道。
据图尼克的律师称,执法人员曾告诉图尼克,如果他不配合,他们就会扣押他的手机,并通过其他方式解锁。
负责此案的法官已设定最后期限,要求各方在10月底前提交最终的初步法庭文件。
目前尚未确定审判日期。
An airport search, a wiped phone and a potential test of Fourth Amendment protections
2026-08-02T16:00:26.430Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/02/politics/airport-search-left-wing-activist-phone-code-fourth-amendment
In a small room at the Atlanta International Airport, without a warrant and ignoring his protest and requests for his attorney, a left-wing activist and US citizen says Border Patrol officers started to search his devices, luggage and diary.
Sam Tunick, involved in the Stop Cop City movement, which opposed an 85-acre law enforcement training center in Georgia that opened in April 2025, was returning from a vacation in the Dominican Republic in January of that year when Border Patrol officers, coordinating with the FBI, pulled him aside, according to his lawyers.
After refusing to answer questions, the officers began searching Tunick and the items eventually asking for access to his phone, Tunick and the prosecutors say. According to prosecutors, Tunick then gave officers a passcode that wiped the contents of the device.
Tunick was charged that November with a single count of destroying property to prevent seizure. He has pleaded not guilty and has not been charged with any additional crimes.
Experts told CNN the case could be a toehold to challenge how Fourth Amendment protections, which generally prohibit search and seizures without probable cause, are weakened at the US border and entry points into the US, including international airports.
“It’s not that the Fourth Amendment doesn’t apply at the border,” white-collar criminal defense attorney Paul Calli told CNN. “It’s that there’s no requirement for reasonable suspicion, like there would be not at the border.”
Tunick’s lawyers say agents told him that he was suspected of possessing child pornography before they demanded access to his phone. But during a hearing last week on efforts to suppress evidence and testimony gathered during the search, CBP agents admitted there was no reason to suspect Tunick possessed child sex abuse material, according to his attorneys.
“They were unequivocal that no, we had no reason to think that was applicable to Sam, it was part of our shtick to sort of get him to open up,” Tunick’s attorney Matthew Dodge told CNN.
CBP said agents have authority to search the devices of anyone entering the US “regardless of citizenship.”
Despite Tunick’s protest and refusal to allow such a search, the officers still went through his luggage and personal journal before turning to his phone, according to his attorneys.
Tunick said he also repeatedly directed the officers to his lawyer’s business card, which he was carrying.
“Because you’re refusing to talk, which is your right, we have the authority to go through your phone to see what we’re looking for,” one of the officers said, according footage of the incident provided to Tunick’s attorneys.
CNN has not reviewed the footage.
When he asked for a second time why he was not allowed to contact his lawyer, Tunick was told that “when it comes to immigration and customs, right, it’s a whole different ballgame.”
“We have search authority, we don’t need a warrant,” Tunick was told, according to his lawyer’s March court filing.
Tunick’s attorneys also allege their client was never read his Miranda rights nor given the chance to have a lawyer present.
“Sam’s big interest here was protecting his privacy, not hiding evidence of wrongdoing,” Dodge said.
Tunick’s attorneys claimed in the March court filing the search was conducted because of his involvement in the group opposing law enforcement training facility.
As it was being constructed, the Atlanta facility was a hot spot for protests and, at times, violent clashes with police. Authorities charged dozens of activists allegedly associated with the protests. Law enforcement shot a man 57 times in January 2023 after they say he opened fire at officers near the facility.
Border exemptions and questions of obstruction
When asked about the case, CBP told CNN it has the authority to search all electronic devices for people, regardless of citizenship, coming or leaving the US, “to enforce laws addressing terrorism, child exploitation, drug- and human-smuggling, visa fraud, and national security threats.”
The statement continued: “The border search will only include an examination of information that is present on the device at the time it is presented for inspection. In Fiscal Year 2025, less than 0.01% of all arriving international travelers had their electronic devices searched by CBP.”
The limits of that authority, however, could be challenged with cases like Tunick’s.
“We are hopeful that this general rule, that the Fourth Amendment doesn’t apply at the border, (has) just got to be revised and corrected,” Dodge said. “And this is a pretty vivid example of why that rule is far too broad.”
“It has to be much more tailored rule about the Fourth Amendment at the airports,” Dodge added.
In speaking broadly about warrantless seizure, Nathan Freed Wessler, the American Civil Liberties Union’s deputy director for the foundation’s speech, privacy, and technology project told CNN there are several “cases pending in a few courts of appeals now where this question is really live.”
“A couple federal courts of appeals have imposed more stringent limitations than the government was,” Wessler added. “And there are a handful of federal district court judges who have actually gone the whole way and said a warrant is required because this is such a privacy imposition.”
The appeals court that will have jurisdiction over Tunick’s case — the 11th Circuit — however, has previously ruled that phones and electronic devices don’t have greater protections than a suitcase or handbag, despite the vast amount of personal information stored in those devices, Wessler noted.
Questions also remain over whether giving law enforcement a passcode that strips your device of information constitutes obstructing an investigation.
“Obstruction means I’m obstructing some type of investigation, and without any type of warrant or even reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, what investigation am I obstructing?” Mike Fox, a legal fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, a think-tank focused on issues of civil liberties, told CNN.
Fox noted that it’s unclear what recourse federal agents would have if a person refused to hand over their phone passcode in a similar, warrantless search.
“They’re not going to deny entry because he’s a US citizen,” he said. “But are they going to charge him with some type of obstruction or take his device?”
“This is new, uncharted territory,” Fox added.
According to his attorneys, Tunick was told by officers that if he didn’t comply, they would take his phone and access it by other means.
The judge overseeing the case issued a deadline for final preliminary court filings in late October.
No trial date has been set.
发表回复