2026年7月29日 美国东部时间下午5:02 / 福克斯新闻网
詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔称，对法官及其裁决进行有理有据的事实性批评是“自由社会中的合理行为”
作者：彼得·皮内多 福克斯新闻网
乔纳森·图利：左翼妖魔化最高法院以“削弱法院权威”
福克斯新闻专栏作家乔纳森·图利称，最高法院大法官住所外的有组织抗议是一场旨在“削弱法院权威”、影响司法裁决的政治运动的一部分。他批评针对法官的妖魔化言论，并援引了卡瓦诺大法官未遂刺杀事件以及2022年6月巴雷特大法官住所外出现“血腥玩偶”的抗议活动。
新功能：现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/3f136e8f-5879-4ee2-9e10-e72fd6c0c42c
收听本文
4分钟
一名特朗普政府时期国土安全部的高级官员痛斥“自由派媒体”，称其对他一系列批评激进法官的言论的反应“荒诞至极”。
国土安全部总法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔上周在X平台上发布了系列帖子《最恶劣司法者：地区法院法官版》。
在这些帖子中，珀西瓦尔指出了美国移民海关执法局（ICE）特工在执法时面临的风险，称部分法官正试图“破坏”执法行动，将警员置于“危险之中”。
共和党参议员推出博阿斯伯格法案，阻止“ rogue”法官操纵特朗普相关案件
在发布这些帖子后，珀西瓦尔表示，《芝加哥太阳时报》的一名记者联系了他，询问在“联邦法官持续面临威胁”的背景下，“这类社交媒体帖子是否会带来更多威胁”。
作为回应，珀西瓦尔在X平台上发帖怒斥该媒体，并对粉丝说道：“看看自由派媒体对我的新系列《最恶劣司法者：地区法院法官版》的反应，简直荒诞至极。”
珀西瓦尔强调，“对法官及其裁决进行有理有据的事实性批评，是自由社会中的合理行为”。他还指出，“如果法官是保守派，媒体对此毫无异议”。
值得注意的是，包括布雷特·卡瓦诺和艾米·科尼·巴雷特在内的保守派大法官一直是左翼强烈批评的目标，部分情况还伴随暴力。2022年，一名武装男子从加利福尼亚州前往卡瓦诺的住所，携带手枪、弹药、扎带、胡椒喷雾、胶带和盗窃工具，企图实施刺杀。此外，巴雷特在最近的国会听证会上作证称，她因威胁不得不穿着防弹背心。
在《最恶劣司法者：激进法官版》系列中，珀西瓦尔点名批评了伊利诺伊州、马萨诸塞州、马里兰州和加利福尼亚州庇护管辖区内的地区法官。
大法官尼尔·戈萨奇打破沉默，谈针对司法系统和最高法院的暴力威胁与泄密事件
珀西瓦尔表示，本月早些时候，克林顿任命的伊利诺伊州北区法官马修·肯内利下令全国范围内暂停终止缅甸移民的临时保护身份。
珀西瓦尔写道，肯内利下达了这项禁制令，“尽管此类决定不受司法审查，尽管最高法院已四次在临时保护身份问题上支持我们，尽管第七巡回上诉法院仅在几天前就同一问题简易驳回了他的裁决”。
“这就是司法破坏。”
珀西瓦尔写道，拜登任命的加利福尼亚州中区法官埃尔南·维拉最近“下令微观管理国土安全部针对洛杉矶境内暴力反ICE煽动者的武力使用政策”。
珀西瓦尔指出，该法官“将煽动者描述为‘抗议者’和‘法律观察员’，却将国土安全部保护人员和财产的行动描述为‘暴力行为’”。
最高法院审议特朗普政府终止海地、叙利亚移民临时保护身份的请求
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
珀西瓦尔指出：“洛杉矶的煽动者袭击国土安全部员工、向他们投掷物品、纵火，甚至试图闯入联邦设施。”
“在这种情况下，法官对武力使用的微观管理将我们的警员置于危险之中。”
订阅政治新闻通讯
针对此事，伊利诺伊州北区美国地方法院发言人肖恩·刘易斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道：“《司法行为准则》要求联邦法官不得公开评论待决案件。同时也要求他们根据法律和事实独立裁决每一起案件——不受政治压力、公众反应、党派利益或批评恐惧的影响。”
刘易斯补充道：“当有人不同意某项裁决时，通过上诉程序提出质疑才是恰当的方式。”
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系《芝加哥太阳时报》和加利福尼亚州中区美国地方法院征求评论。
彼得·皮内多是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治撰稿人。
DHS eviscerates media for ‘absolute absurdity’ over concern about ‘worst of the worst’ activist judges list
July 29, 2026 5:02pm EDT / Fox News
James Percival said legitimate fact-based critiques of judges and their rulings are ‘fair game in a free society’
By Peter Pinedo Fox News
Jonathan Turley: Left demonizes Supreme Court to ‘gut the court’
Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley claims organized protests outside Supreme Court justices’ homes are part of a political movement to ‘gut the court’ and influence judicial decisions. He criticizes the rhetoric aimed at demonizing judges, citing incidents like the attempted assassination of Justice Kavanaugh and demonstrations with ‘bloody dolls’ at Justice Barrett’s home in June 2022.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/3f136e8f-5879-4ee2-9e10-e72fd6c0c42c
Listen to this article
4 min
A high-ranking Trump Department of Homeland Security official called out the “liberal media” for what he referred to as the “absolute absurdity” of its response to his series criticizing activist judges.
James Percival, general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, posted a series on X last week, “Worst of the Worst, District Judge Edition.”
In his posts, Percival pointed to the risks that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents face while enforcing the law, saying some judges are working to “sabotage” those operations and put officers “at risk.”
GOP SENATOR UNVEILS BOASBERG ACT TO STOP ‘ROGUE’ JUDGES FROM HANDPICKING TRUMP CASES
After his posts, Percival said DHS was contacted by a Chicago Sun-Times reporter about whether “a social media post like this risk[s] additional threats” in the context of “ongoing threats to federal judges.”
In response, Percival blasted the outlet in an X post in which he told followers, “Witness the absolute absurdity of the liberal media response to my new series, Worst of the Worst, District Judges.”
ICE agents knock on the door of a residence during a multi-agency targeted enforcement operation in Chicago Jan. 26, 2025.(Bloomberg)
Percival emphasized that “legitimate fact based critiques of judges and their rulings is fair game in a free society.” He also noted that “the media has no issue with it if the judge is conservative.”
Notably, conservative judges, including Supreme Court justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, have been the target of intense criticism from the left and, in some cases, violence. In 2022, Kavanaugh was the target of an assassination plot after an armed California man traveled to his home with a pistol, ammunition, zip ties, pepper spray, duct tape and burglary tools. Further, Barrett testified in a recent congressional hearing that she has had to wear a bulletproof vest in response to threats.
In his Worst of the Worst activist judges series, Percival called out district judges in the sanctuary jurisdictions of Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland and California.
JUSTICE NEIL GORSUCH BREAKS SILENCE ON VIOLENT THREATS AGAINST JUDICIARY, SUPREME COURT LEAKS
ICE agents stand guard in front of protesters outside the federal immigration center at Delaney Hall in Newark, where ICE is housing detained immigrants, May 26, 2026, in Newark, N.J.(Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Percival said that, earlier this month, Northern District of Illinois Judge Matthew Kennelly, a Clinton appointee, ordered a nationwide pause on the termination of temporary protected status for migrants from Burma.
Percival wrote that Kennelly ordered the stay “even though these decisions are not subject to judicial review, even though we have been vindicated by the Supreme Court on TPS four times, and even though the Seventh Circuit summarily reversed him on the same issue only days before.
“This is judicial sabotage.”
Percival wrote that Central District of California Judge Hernán Vera, a Biden appointee, recently “entered an order micromanaging DHS’s use of force policy with respect to violent anti-ICE agitators in Los Angeles.”
Percival noted that the judge “described the agitators as ‘protesters’ and ‘legal observers,’ while describing DHS’s actions defending its personnel and property as ‘violent.’”
SUPREME COURT WEIGHS TRUMP EFFORT TO TERMINATE TEMPORARY PROTECTIONS FOR HAITIAN, SYRIAN MIGRANTS
Homeland Security General Counsel James Percival(DHS official portrait)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Percival noted, “Agitators in Los Angeles have assaulted DHS employees, thrown objects at them, engaged in arson, and even tried to breech [sic] a federal facility.
“Judicial micromanagement of use of force in these contexts puts our officers at risk.”
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
In response, Sean Lewis, a spokesperson for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, told Fox News Digital that “the Code of Conduct calls on federal judges not to comment publicly on pending cases. It also requires them to decide each matter independently, based on the law and the facts — not political pressure, public reaction, partisan interests or fear of criticism.”
Lewis added that “when someone disagrees with a ruling, the appropriate way to challenge it is through the appellate process.”
Fox News Digital reached out to the Chicago Sun-Times and the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for comment.
Peter Pinedo is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.
发表回复